Greenspan defends legacy, jabs Hill
Tags:
Text Size
- -
- +
- reset
- Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan continued to sidestep attempts to force him to admit to specific mistakes at Wednesday's hearing. AP Photo
POLITICO 44
Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Federal Reserve, continued his crusade to defend his legacy, saying he was right 70 percent of the time during his 21 years in public service.
Greenspan told a panel investigating the collapse of financial markets that banks should be required to hold more capital and traders more collateral — the "only" steps that would help soften the blow of a future crisis.
Policies that the Fed put in place were not enough to "stop the surge of subprime lending," he said, but things are better than they would've been without the board's guidance.
Greenspan has consistently sidestepped the panel's attempts to force him to admit to specific mistakes. He called retrospection about what-ifs a "futile activity."
The crux of Greenspan's argument was that in addition to higher capital and collateral requirements, stricter "enforcement against misrepresentation and fraud” is necessary so that losses are restricted to investors who “seek abnormal returns.”
Greenspan also took pointed shots at Congress, saying that there was "remarkable" pressure on the Fed to enhance lending. He said there was "a lot of amnesia" emerging from Capitol Hill among lawmakers calling for stricter regulation. There was "fairly broad consensus" that increased home ownership was a positive trend.
The committee is beginning three days of hearings on securitization and regulation of subprime lending. On Wednesday, it will hear from former Citigroup risk executives. Robert Rubin, the former chairman of Citigroup and Clinton administration treasury secretary, will testify Thursday, as will the comptroller of the currency.
Greenspan, in his prepared remarks, continued to say that the impact of regulation on financial markets is limited. But, he said, the rules in place did fail to regulate a market leading, many believe, to a meltdown of the economy.
“Even with the breakdown of private risk management and the collapse of private counterparty credit surveillance, the financial system would have held together had the second bulwark against our crisis — our regulatory system — functioned effectively,” Greenspan said in prepared remarks. “But under crisis pressure, it, too, failed.”
But Brooksley Born, a panel member and former chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, questioned whether the Fed, under Greenspan, failed in part because of his negative view on regulation.
“The notion that somehow that my views on regulation were predominant and effective as influencing the Congress is something you may have perceived. It didn’t look that way from my point of view,” Greenspan replied, in his most defensive answer of the morning.
“I ran my office as required by law and there are an awful lot of laws I would not have constructed in the way they were constructed, I enforced them nonetheless,” Greenspan said.
Greenspan also took a shot at the idea of "too big to fail" — the notion that some financial institutions cannot be allowed to collapse because of the damage it would cause to the broader economy. He told the committee in prepared remarks that the doctrine "can not be allowed to stand" because it encourages banks to take on too much risk.
The 84-year-old Greenspan did offer a sliver of criticism of the Fed, saying that the structure of the New York Fed "has to be thought through."
At about 11:45, as panel chairman Phil Angelides was announcing that he was wrapping up the segment with Greenspan, the power in cavernous Rayburn hearing room went off. The lights shut down and Greenspan remained sitting at the witness table.
With the curtains open, and light pouring through the floor-to-ceiling windows behind the panel, the chairman asked the question many wanted to ask. Angelides asked Greenspan if he thought there was a failure of regulation in the financial system.
With the microphones off, little was audible from the former chairman, and Angelides said that Greenspan gave a "lights out" performance.
Readers' Comments (48)
Which official(and his mentor) ultimately decides the lending rate charged to banks? Hopefully, the Japanese practice of hara kari will become part of the leadership culture in America.
I find it difficult to believe Greenspan can defend anything that he did. Alan Greenspan broke U.S. law when he went to work for the German bank, Deutschebank immediately after leaving his position. He further broke U.S. law by going to work for PIMCO, the largest bond firm in the world, that used to be a U.S. bond company until the giant German insurer Allianz took them over, a move that Greenspan never did anything to prevent. Greenspan never did anything that was not detrimental to the U.S. or beneficial to Japan and Germany economically. He follows the pattern set by his predecessor Paul Volcker, who also should have been criminally charged for breaking U.S. law by going to work for a private Japanese equity firm - Fuji-Wolfensohn along with former World Bank head, Wolfensohn, that paid him millions of dollars to "represent Japanese companies in the U.S." Volcker was obviously representing Japanese and German companies in the U.S. while he was allowing Japan and Germany to massively undervalue their currencies vis a vis the U.S. dollar to attack the U.S. economically. Just as Greenspan must have been representing Japan and Germany and hurting the U.S. by working to allow a massive buildup of debt in the US and the continued massive acquistions of US treasuries by countries such as Japan instead of raising interest rates and issuing more dollars to cover the U.S. debt.
This monster is so guilty that he derserves a trail ASAP. He and Andrea should leave town or be jailed soon. Along with the other republican and blue dog deems that screwed this counrty for generations to come.
he remonds me Maximillian Shell in Man in the Glass Booth.
Greenspan warned of "irrational exhuberance" in the dot-com economy but continued to keep interest rates low, which makes credit cheap which encouraged borrowing for start up businesses that went nowhere. So yes Mr. Greenspan you do share some of the blame.
Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and the liberals have not been held accountable for the destruction of th American economy their engineered. It's about time they were.
He's right. He's to blame, and Congress is to blame, and Bush is to blame, and Obama will finish the legacy of corruption, with a national bankruptcy. UNLESS, ..... the voters are expeditious in removing the special interest criminals, both lib dem and rino republican.
"Greenspan also took pointed shots at Congress, saying that there was "remarkable" pressure on the Fed to enhance lending. He said there was "a lot of amnesia" emerging from Capitol Hill among lawmakers calling for stricter regulation. There was "fairly broad consensus" that increased home ownership was a positive trend."
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/s...
Of course, this would have fallen on the deaf ears of Rep. Barney Frank.
Can't this guy just go away? Doesn't he realize that he looks worse and worse everytime he opens his mouth?
Can't this guy just go away? Doesn't he realize that he looks worse and worse everytime he opens his mouth?
Greenspan IGNORED what was coming.
He knew and if he had done his job we would NOT be in the mess we are today.
Greenspan knew about the Fannie and Freddie fiasco yet Barney Frank and Chris Dodd ran with their finest "charity".
All under the NINJA loans.
HUD also has blame to take as they funded ACORN with housing.
Americans will NOT be happy when the news about Fannie and Freddi comes out.
Obama and Holder have claimed that Fannie and Freddie is NOT under the Freedom of Information Act.
That alone is the biggest RED flag.
Fannie and Freddie's finances are NOT on Americans books.
WHY?
Dodd is NOT to be trusted in his play about the financial REFORM.
Anyone who believes him is dumber than a rock.
Investigate this travesty perpetrated on the taxpayers,.....THEN ....and only then listen to Dodds next scheme.
Also, Chris Cox and all Bush US Attorneys did nothing, NOTHING about bank fraud. Lying no doc loans were never checked. Shame on the Bush administration as well. They were part of the problem!
Thanks for the laugh. It never ceases to amaze me that even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, some dems just continue to parrot the lib's talking points regarding the meltdown of the mortgage industry. I assume that since the main focus of this story is the disasterous results of the mortgage crisis, you are blaming the republicans and blue-dog dems for the screw-up. The dems like to say that it was republicans who enacted deregulation legislation that allowed banks to get involved with shady housing loans. The dems like to forget that on November 12, 1999, Bill Clinton repealed the Glass Steagall Act, which for 55 years had prevented banks from getting into the so-called "investment banking" business ". The mortgage crisis may have never happened if Clinton had not repealed the law that prevented banks from getting in the risky investment banking business.
The Bush administration and congress tried to rein in Fannie Mae for years, but they were blocked in their efforts by people like Barney Frank, Chris "Countrywide" Dodd, Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi, the congressional black caucus and many other democrats that no one would ever describe as being a blue-dog. Those democrats assured us that Fannie Mae was in great shape. Well they lied.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
There is no "DEFENSE" for what Mr. Greenspan did. He worked with both Bushes, the Clintons, Congress, and Wall Street to rob Americans of their wealth and assets. All that money is now in private off-shore bank accounts in the names of those corrupt perpetrators and all their criminal friends.
docbraden.blogspot.com
I remember when Greenspan warned of "irrational exuberance" in the markets. He was right about that, but, I think he was a bit lax on regulation. I want a full investigation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Greenspan should be Madoff's cell-mate. As Michael Burry wrote in a NY Times op-ed Sunday, "I saw the Crisis Coming Why Didn't the Fed?", Greenspan told Americans in 2004 they would be missing out not to take advantage of the adjustable-rate mortgages. Subprime borrowers did exactly that as Greenspan "trumpeted the expansion of the subprime mortgage market" in 2005. Not only did Greenspan fail to warn us of impending disaster, he encouraged it.
Frank doesn't
Frank blames Greenspan and anyone else he can find as long as its NOT himself.
But his fingerprints are all over this fiasco.
Time after time, Frank insisted that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were in good shape.
Six years ago, when the Bush administration proposed much tighter regulation of the two companies, Frank was adamant that "these two entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not facing any kind of financial crisis".
When the White House warned of "systemic risk for our financial system' unless the mortgage giants were curbed, Frank complained that the administration was more concerned about financial safety than about housing.
Now that the bubble has burst and the "systemic risk" is apparent to all, Frank blithely declares, "The private sector got us into this mess."
Wall Street and private lenders have plenty to answer for, but it was Washington and the political class that derailed this train.
If Frank is looking for a someone to blame, he can find him in the nearest mirror.
Dodd was his partner in crime on the Senate side with Chuck Schumer and Maxine Waters in the mix.
Greenspan neglected his role in the "regulations" that were already in place.
NOW they want more.
More so they can ignore them also?
Congress has a lot to answer for and I hope America has awakened to the fact that WE need to replace every incumbent but really! The guy sets the FED rate at 1%, the Glass-Steagall Act is repealed and he expects Monet Grabbing Invstment banks (Citigroup, Goldman-Sachs, etc.)not to jump into the housing market?
http://www.fool.com/investi...
Who's the bigger fool, him or us for electing these sh**heads who will not audit the FED?
Rep Ron Paul has been trying to get this legislation through Congress for 30 years, finally gets the bill out of the house and now the Senate isthrowing it in the can.
http://www.ronpaul.com/on-t...
Don't Re-Elect Incumbent Politicians (DRIP)!
Greenspan said the selling of the soaring number of subprime mortgages in securities to investors was the trigger for the financial crisis.
He blamed affordable housing mandates set by federal officials on the government sponsored housing enterprises,
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,
and their subsequent large--scale purchase of securities backed by subprime mortgages, for the housing bubble that later burst, sending financial markets reeling.
Did Greenspan turn his head sideways while Barney Frank and Chris Dodd did this to our economy?
YES!
I ran across this brilliant piece of political philosophy. How times change!
"The purpose of the...Party is to establish and maintain a peaceful world and
build at home a dynamic prosperity in which every citizen fairly shares. We shall ever
build anew, that our children and their children, without distinction because of race,
creed or color, may know the blessings of our free land.
"We believe that basic to governmental integrity are unimpeachable ethical
standards and irreproachable personal conduct by all people in government. We shall
continue our insistence on honesty as an indispensable requirement of public service.
We shall continue to root out corruption whenever and wherever it appears.
"We are proud of and shall continue our far-reaching and sound advances in
matters of basic human needs—expansion of social security—broadened coverage in
unemployment insurance —improved housing—and better health protection for all our
people. We are determined that our government remain warmly responsive to the
urgent social and economic problems of our people."
Excerpts from the Republican Party Platform of 1956
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu...
Greenspan helped create this mess. He can point his finger all he wants but a lot of this was his fault in my opinion.