Comments about
our
website?
Contact the
Pacific Web Master
Questions? Need
more
information? Contact
Public Information
| |
Answers to Questions About Offshore Oil and Gas |
|
|
Q.
What is the Minerals Management Service (MMS)?
A. The MMS is the Federal agency
responsible for managing the mineral resources (such as oil and
natural gas) in Federal waters offshore the United States and for
collecting and disbursing the
revenues from the production of these resources. In managing the
offshore oil and gas resources, the MMS conducts environmental
studies, issues leases, and regulates operations conducted on the
Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). The regulatory responsibilities
include issuing permits for oil and gas exploration, development,
and production and inspecting operations during all of these
activities. The MMS manages the offshore mineral resources in
concert with other Federal, State, and local agencies and in
consultation with the public.
|
|
Q. What is the OCS?
A. Under United States law, the term
Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) refers to all submerged lands lying
seaward of State offshore lands. Generally referred to as "Federal
waters,” the OCS encompasses the seabed and subsoil in which natural
resources of vital importance to the Nation are found: nearly 17
percent of our oil reserves, 25 percent of our natural gas reserves,
and resources of commercially important minerals including
manganese, gold, phosphorite, and construction aggregates. In 1945,
because of the potential value of such minerals, President Truman
proclaimed that the Federal Government had jurisdiction over all
offshore resources, from the coastline seaward, and a 1947 Supreme
Court case essentially upheld the Truman Proclamation and the claims
of the Federal Government.
However, in 1953,
Congress passed and President Eisenhower signed the Submerged Lands
Act which established natural resource jurisdiction seaward out to 3
geographical miles for practically all coastal States, including
California. The seabed and subsoil resources landward of this offshore
State/Federal boundary are managed by the State. Offshore mineral
resources in the 3-mile band of
California State waters (or
Tidelands, as it is referred to in the State) are managed by the
California State Lands Commission and the California Division of
Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources. In the cases of Texas and the
Gulf of Mexico
coast of Florida, because those States had established larger
offshore submerged land areas before achieving statehood, State
waters extend to 3 marine leagues (about 9 miles).
A few months after
enactment of the Submerged Lands Act, the Outer Continental Shelf
Lands Act (OCSLA) was passed and signed into law. The OCS law
provides the Secretary of the Interior, on behalf of the Federal
Government, with authority to manage the mineral resources,
including oil and gas, on the OCS and defines the OCS as all
submerged lands lying seaward of the State/Federal boundary. The
seaward extent of the OCS was not made clear by the OCSLA. However,
it is limited by international law which extends the OCS to 200
nautical miles seaward from the coastline but does not take into
consideration the State/Federal boundary. In effect, therefore,
under the OCSLA and international law, the Federal OCS begins at the
State submerged lands line and extends seaward at least another 197
nautical miles. This overall 200 mile legal definition of a coastal
Nation's OCS is referred to as its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).
However, the OCS
may extend beyond 200 miles if the outer limits of the coastal
margin, as measured by certain geological concepts, go past that
boundary. Depending on factors such as sediment thickness and water
depth, the geologic continental margin can extend for hundreds of
miles from shore. There are about a dozen nations, including the
United States, which have continental shelves that extend beyond 200
miles. In the
U.S., broad geological margins extend beyond 200 miles north of
Alaska, on the
Atlantic coast, and in the Gulf of Mexico. In the Pacific, however,
the continental margin is narrow and thus the U.S. claims natural
resource jurisdiction only to the seaward extent of its west coast
EEZ, 200 nautical miles from California, Washington, and Oregon.
|
|
Q.
Why drill offshore?
A. Efforts to develop and expand
the use of viable alternatives continue. However, regardless of the
extent of these efforts, natural gas and oil will remain the primary
sources of reliable energy well into the next century.
California is a major consumer of
petroleum products and ranks among the top five oil consumers,
worldwide. (Others include: the United States as a whole, the
Commonwealth of Independent States [former Soviet Union], Japan, and
Germany.) Sixty percent of California's energy use is based on oil
and another 30 percent on natural gas. California produces about 45
percent of the oil it consumes (20 percent of which is produced
offshore), and onshore production is declining.
Natural gas is a clean source of
energy, and the gas produced offshore
Ventura and Santa Barbara
Counties is used locally to heat homes and offices. The OCS
platforms off California have produced over three times as much gas
as used by the residential users in
Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San
Luis Obispo Counties.
Given California's increasing
population and continued thirst for energy, new sources of natural
gas and oil will be required. Californians will need to decide how
this will be accomplished through local offshore production, by
increased tanker traffic for the importation of oil, or through
massive state wide conservation efforts.
|
|
Q.
How much oil is spilled or "leaked" from OCS natural gas and oil
operations?
A. In 1969, a Federal platform
offshore Santa Barbara experienced a blowout in one of its wells; an
estimated 80,000 barrels (3,360,000 gallons) or oil was released
into the ocean. The result of this incident was at least twofold:
(1) the environmental conscience of the Nation was raised and the
National Environmental Policy Act and other environmental
legislation was passed and (2) requirements for safety devices
imposed by the Federal Government forever changed offshore
operations. There has not been a spill of this size from OCS
operations since the Santa Barbara spill.
OCS operations are carefully
conducted and regulated to ensure safe and environmentally sound
operations. Since the tragic oil spill in Santa Barbara in 1969,
about 833 barrels of oil have been spilled as a result of OCS
natural gas and oil operations offshore California. This spillage
represents the cumulative loss from cups or a barrel at any given
time, but for a 150 barrel spill from a pipeline in State waters
carrying exclusively OCS production to shore. The California
nearshore and coastal areas are replete with natural seeps. It is
estimated that over 1,000 barrels of oil each week are released into
the environment from these seeps. (From the Coal Oil Point seeps
alone, almost 200 barrels a day may be entering the ocean.) There
is some evidence that commercial production of the reservoirs
offshore has reduced the amount of oil that would naturally seep
into the marine environment by reducing pressure in the reservoirs.
|
|
Q.
Who makes sure that the oil companies operate safely and do not
pollute?
A. The companies are held
responsible for safety to the environment and employees.
Nevertheless, every day of the year, MMS inspectors are offshore
scrutinizing drilling and production operations to ensure that the
operations are being conducted safely and that the environment is
protected. The MMS inspectors conduct unannounced inspections on
each facility on a routine basis and inspect each facility offshore
California at least once a week. Furthermore, there is an extensive
annual inspection of each facility sometimes lasting 2-3 weeks,
depending on the complexity of the facility.
Any violation found is reported
and resolution pursued to ensure that corrective action is taken.
The MMS has broad powers of enforcement and can require extreme
measures, such as facility shutdowns and civil penalties, if
warranted. Any violation which does or could result in loss of life
or environmental damage is considered serious and is reviewed for
civil penalty assessment.
|
|
Q.
Why not move the platforms further offshore where they cannot be
seen?
A. The platforms have to be
located where the oil is. Oil occurs and accumulates where there are
thick sedimentary rocks. Off California, this occurs in the nearshore
basins. In recent years, the extended-reach well technology has
improved markedly, resulting in the ability to use fewer platforms
for the recovery of resources. In the Santa Barbara Channel,
for example, ExxonMobil is using this technology to produce oil from
4 1/2 miles away from the wellhead on Platform Hondo.
ExxonMobil is now producing the Sacate field using extended-reach
well technology, obviating the need for an additional platform.
As this technology improves, additional production from existing
facilities becomes more promising.
|
|
Q.
Where does tar on the beach come from?
A. Oil, tar, and gas seeps are
common along the California coast. These seeps are part of the
natural environment, and geological and archeological evidence shows
that seepage has occurred throughout California for thousands of
years. Scientists have found that seepage from one of the largest
seeps known offshore Coal Oil Point ranged from 150-170 barrels per
day. At least 2,000 active oil and gas seeps have been mapped in
waters offshore California.
|
|
Q.
What is a geophysical/seismic survey?
A. Geophysical/seismic surveying
is a method of mapping below the seafloor using sound waves. The
sound waves, typically made with bursts of compressed air, are reflected back from rock layers below the seafloor and are recorded. Geophysicists use these data to look for
potential oil and gas resources.
One of the concerns expressed in
the past when seismic surveys are proposed are the effects on marine
mammals. While there are only limited
data available to evaluate the effects from this noise on marine
mammals, seismic surveys cover thousands of survey miles yearly
throughout the world oceans, with no reported effects on marine
mammal numbers or distribution in the surveyed areas. The National
Marine Fisheries and other marine mammal researchers continue to
study this issue. In the interim, to reduce the chance of impacts on
marine mammals, proper precautions are being taken. For example, the
survey companies take several precautionary measures in their
operations to provide additional assurance that the animals will
not be harmed. One such measure is shutting down the survey
operation when marine mammals are in the vicinity.
|
|
Q.
What is drilling mud? Is it toxic?
A. Drilling mud is literally a
mud which is pumped down the hole when a well is drilled. The mud
serves several important functions including providing a way to
remove displaced rock fragments (called drill cuttings) from the
hole and keeping the equipment in the hole cool while drilling.
Because mud is typically disposed of into the ocean, the components
(ingredients) of the mud are carefully monitored and their effects
studied.
Drilling mud is not poisonous,
but it is referred to as "toxic." Mud is made up primarily of clay,
barium sulfate, and water, with water making up about 90% of the
mixture. Because the materials used to make the mud are taken from
onshore sites, they can contain minerals and impurities that are not
commonly found on the ocean floor where it is disposed. Additives
that once were added to mud and found to have been harmful, such as
chromium, have been banned. Animals and plants in the water column
adjacent to a drilling operation may be adversely affected by the
increased turbidity of the water caused by the mud.
Extensive studies have been
conducted to monitor the potential impacts to the environment from
discharge of drilling muds. To date, these studies have found that
effects are short-lived and confined to a localized area around the
platform. Studies to determine subtle, long-term effects caused by
drilling muds have been inconclusive; effects of muds cannot be
distinguished from other changes in the environment.
|
|
Q.
What are the potential impacts to the sea otter from oil?
A. Sea otters are the marine
mammals most vulnerable to oiling. The sea otters in California were
given "threatened species" status due to their proximity to marine
terminals in northern California and their risk from spills. A small
amount of fur oiling or ingestion of oil can result in mortality. A
permanent site has been established at University of
California at Santa Cruz to clean and
rehabilitate sea otters should they be oiled in a spill from any
source. The MMS has funded a number of studies to refine clean-up
techniques. The studies results were shared with those responding to
the Valdez tanker accident and were used as the basis of response to
the oiled animals. A handbook on the emergency care and
rehabilitation of oiled sea otters has been published as a result of
MMS-funded studies.
|
|
Q.
Where do whales migrate offshore?
A. Most of the major whale
species migrate between their feeding grounds, which lie as far
north as the Bering Sea, and their breeding areas offshore
Mexico and Central America. On their
migrations, whales pass along the California coast at varying
distances from shore. Gray whales migrate closest to shore and
generally pass through the Santa Barbara Channel during their
migration. While oil and natural gas activities have been raised as
a concern both in terms of potential noise and oil impacts, studies
to date indicate that oil activities do not appear to adversely
affect the whale populations or their migration. The activities of
whales continue to be monitored so that impacts can be detected and
avoided.
|
|
Q.
How much do OCS facilities contribute to air pollution?
A. The OCS oil and gas platforms
offshore California contribute approximately 3% of the total
emissions in the tri-county area (Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San
Luis Obispo Counties). The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 transferred control of OCS air
quality from the MMS to the EPA, which delegated regulatory
authority to local air agencies. Rigorous controls to minimize
emissions from Pacific OCS platform operations have been instituted
by the local air agencies. On all the platforms, Fugitive Emission
Inspection and Maintenance programs to eliminate hydrocarbon
emissions resulting from leaking valve and flanges on the facilities
are in place. The platforms also have permanent control technologies
in place for all non-standby combustion equipment rated at 50 hp or
greater to minimize nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from those
operations. The platforms are inspected on a regular basis to ensure
compliance with applicable requirements. In addition,
electrification of the newer platforms in the Pacific Region
substantially reduces the potential for NOx emissions from platform
operations.
The platforms off California are
among the cleanest in the world. Concerns, however, remain regarding
the emissions from support vessels servicing the platforms such as
crew and supply boats. These emissions are considered by the
counties in their permitting activities as the platform's total
potential to emit. In this way, the local air agencies expect to
further minimize air quality impacts from those sources.
|
|
Q.
How do OCS activities affect commercial fishing?
A. OCS activities can interfere
with commercial fishing in two ways, both of which have financial
ramifications for the fishermen: (1) by precluding traditional
fishing grounds with exploratory drilling vessels or with platforms
and (2) through loss of income either through gear loss on
underwater obstructions or lack of access to an area. Potential
economic losses are mitigated through direct compensation to
fishermen, in most cases, and through enhancement programs.
(Enhancement programs are measures undertaken to build up the
fishery of concern or to enable the fishermen to operate more
profitably. These out-of-kind enhancement programs might include
more storage for gear, etc.) The MMS works with the fishermen to
define and address the potential concerns early in any permitting
process. Furthermore, a fisheries liaison office has been
established in Santa Barbara to provide fishermen an avenue to
effectively resolve conflicts with the offshore oil and gas
industry.
|
|
MMS
Accessibility |
MMS
Quality of Information |
MMS Privacy Policy |
MMS Freedom of Information |
MMS Disclaimer |
Web Master:
Nollie
Gildow-Owens
Page content last updated 5/10/2010
Page last published 5/10/2010 |
|
|