Climate deal salvaged after marathon talks in Durban

Delegates clashed over attempt to make agreement legally binding until deal was struck in pre-dawn hours

Greenpeace protest at the climate change convention in Durban
Greenpeace’s Kumi Naidoo with activists who occupied the convention centre. Photograph: Shayne Robinson/Greenpeace

Countries have agreed a deal in Durban to push for a new climate treaty, salvaging the latest round of United Nations climate talks from the brink of collapse.

The UK's cimate change secretary, Chris Huhne, hailed the deal, finally struck in the early hours of Sunday after talks had overrun by a day and a half, as a "significant step forward" that would deliver a global, overarching legal agreement to cut emissions. He said it sent a strong signal to businesses and investors about moving to a low-carbon economy.

But environmental groups said negotiators had failed to show the ambition necessary to cut emissions by levels that would limit global temperature rises to no more than 2C and avoid "dangerous" climate change.

The EU had come to the talks in Durban, South Africa, calling for a mandate to negotiate a new legally binding treaty on global warming by 2015, covering all major emitters, in return for the bloc signing up to a second period of emissions cuts under the existing Kyoto climate deal.

But talks were plunged into disarray after the EU clashed with India and China in a series of passionate exchanges over the legal status of a potential new agreement, putting more than a year of talks between 194 countries in jeopardy.

In the third consecutive all-night session, exhausted ministers had more or less agreed on a series of measures aimed at protecting forests, widening global markets and establishing by 2020 a $100bn fund to help poorer countries move to a green economy and cope with the effects of climate change. But the crucial issue at the talks was whether a new agreement on protecting the climate should have full legal force.

Connie Hedegarrd, the EU climate change commissioner, said she was prepared to offer developing countries the prize they had sought for many years – a continuation of the Kyoto protocol, the only treaty that commits rich countries to cut greenhouse gases. But the price of the offer was for all nations to agree to be "legally bound" to a new agreement by 2020. There were cheers as she said: "We need clarity. We need to commit. The EU has shown patience for many years. We are almost ready to be alone in a second commitment period [to the Kyoto protocol] We don't ask too much of the world that after this second period all countries will be legally bound."

But the Indian environment minister, Jayanthi Natarajan, responded fiercely: "Am I to write a blank cheque and sign away the livelihoods and sustainability of 1.2 billion Indians, without even knowing what the EU 'roadmap' contains? I wonder if this an agenda to shift the blame on to countries who are not responsible [for climate change]. I am told that India will be blamed. Please do not hold us hostage." As countries clashed in the early hours of the morning, scenes in the conference hall resembled a theatre, with wild applause bursting out sporadically.

China's minister Xie Zhenhua made an impassioned speech backing India and accusing developed countries. "What qualifies you to tell us what to do? We are taking action. We want to see your action," he said.

The fate of the talks were, by 2am, hanging on a knife edge, with no resolution likely for many hours. The talks had already overrun by 36 hours.

A deal was reached after the South African president of the talks urged the EU and India to go "into a huddle" in the middle of the conference hall in the early hours of this morning, in a bid to work out language both sides were happy with.

A compromise, suggested by the Brazilian delegation, saw the EU and Indians agree to a road map which commits countries to negotiating a protocol, another legal instrument or an "agreed outcome with legal force".

The treaty will be negotiated by 2015 and coming into force from 2020.
The deal also paves the way for action to address the "emissions gap" between the voluntary emissions cuts countries have already pledged and the reductions experts say are needed to effectively tackle climate change.

Earlier Venezuela's ambassador, Claudia Salerno, had stood on a chair and banged her nameplate as she accused the UN chair of the session of ignoring the views of some developing countries. Referring to the money promised by rich countries to help developing countries to adapt to climate change, she said: "This agreement will kill off everyone. It is a farce. It is immoral to ask developing countries to sell ourselves for $100bn."

The row over the legal status of a new agreement has dogged climate talks for over a decade. Rich countries have wanted rapidly emerging economies such as like China – the world's largest emitter – and India to be equally legally bound as developed countries, though taking on softer targets on emission curbs.

However, developing countries argue that they were not responsible for the bulk of climate change emissions in the atmosphere and argue that they have pledged to rein in their emissions more than the developed countries.

Despite the broad backing of more than 120 countries, including major developing economies such as Brazil, plus the US and Japan, the EU had found it hard to push through its ambitious "roadmap", which would establish a new over-arching agreement that would commit all countries to emission cuts.

China, India and some developing countries had raised a series of objections throughout the talks about the dates that the new treaty would become operational, and argued that the Kyoto protocol would effectively be killed off before a replacement could be put in its place. With Japan, Canada and Russia saying that they were unwilling to sign up to a second period, the EU had become almost alone among developed countries in committing to continue the protocol in some form.

Several countries said they feared the deal on offer would suit the US most because it had always insisted that all other countries should cut emissions and has resisted a legally-binding agreement.

Several developing countries spoke out strongly in favour of the EU proposals, including Brazil and Colombia, rejecting calls to downgrade the legal status of any agreement.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments

27 comments, displaying oldest first

  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
  • madmonty

    10 December 2011 8:08PM

    No international agreement will be reached, never has never will be. Temperatures will continue to rise, perma frost will melt, kick starting a massive bacterial breakdown of the frozen peat, huge release of methane, temperatures will rise again, to reach 5C above toadays norm, Oceans will warm to melt frozen methane of sea beds and we will then have a mass extinction event and goodbye human race....what we deserve quite frankly....

  • Strummered

    10 December 2011 8:18PM

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards. Replies may also be deleted. For more detail see our FAQs.

  • Cheque

    10 December 2011 8:25PM

    People should use public transport to reduce co2 ....

  • Guimard

    10 December 2011 8:28PM

    Strummered it will be hard to find them amongst the thousands of NGO lobbyists .
    madmonty or none of that will happen, which is bad news for the climate alarmists but good news for everyone else.

  • Contributor
    teaandchocolate

    10 December 2011 8:51PM

    Time is running out.

    It will run out soon. Then it will be too late. Then we will drown, starve, die of thirst, boil, and perish in the many wars for land and resources, and the small number of bewildered survivors will wonder why the people at these summits were such callous money grabbing idiots.

    But it will be too late.

  • scrobhatu

    10 December 2011 8:58PM

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards. Replies may also be deleted. For more detail see our FAQs.

  • bitwize

    10 December 2011 9:02PM

    Observe: the imbeciles who consigned humanity to the evolutionary dustbin for the sake of a few bucks.
    Hopefully the cockroaches will do a better job when they rise to global ascendency

  • euangray

    10 December 2011 9:04PM

    Then it will be too late. Then we will drown, starve, die of thirst, boil, and perish in the many wars for land and resources, and the small number of bewildered survivors will wonder why the people at these summits were such callous money grabbing idiots.

    Or alternatively none of that will happen and it will become glaringly obvious soon enough that AGW, just like overpopulation, mass starvation and resource depletion before it, was just another environmentalist scare - and just another one with the same cause (liberal western industrial capitalism) and the same cure (a more socialist, restricted and primitivist world order).

    But fear not, I'm sure you'll think of another basis for hysteria and publicity.

  • VocalLength

    10 December 2011 9:05PM

    "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

    Albert Einstein

  • drprl

    10 December 2011 9:19PM

    Pity they can't do a papal conclave - wall them up until they have come to an agreement .

  • Pitthewelder

    10 December 2011 9:26PM

    drprl,

    Pity they can't do a papal conclave - wall them up until they have come to an agreement .

    They are politicians - just wall them up !

  • willardmubvumbi

    10 December 2011 9:50PM

    If these meetings does not bring any solution, what's the problem of conducting them?

  • Durbanian

    10 December 2011 9:52PM

    No, the ones in the meetings are the politicians the ones outside are the ones paying the politicians to prevaricate - fossil fueled lobbyists.

    The US envoy won't sign, because the democratically elected President Obama does not want him to sign, and the democratically elected Senate wouldn't sign it if he did.

    Its the taxpayer who is paying the politicians to prevaricate. Its the taxpayers who buy the plane tickets and pay the negotiators.

    Of course the Chinese didn't sign either. Is China full of fossil fuel lobbyists?

  • Bodecs

    10 December 2011 9:52PM

    They are all hypocrites. Flying from all corners of the world to talk about cuts in climate emissions? The first thing to cut is the emissions generated and released as a result of all these jet travels.

  • EzekielBenOr

    10 December 2011 9:55PM

    If Durban fails we can expect a huge spike in applications to immigrate to Canada as per James Lovelock's wise advice... Baffin Island alone could accomodate double the UK population. My money is on it...

  • Lacrobat

    10 December 2011 9:58PM

    Ha ha another warmist jolly descends into farce

  • Durbanian

    10 December 2011 9:59PM

    Baffin Island alone could accomodate double the UK population. My money is on it...

    So how are house prices on Baffin Island these days if you do indeed have your money in it?

  • EzekielBenOr

    10 December 2011 10:06PM

    Last time I checked a comfy prefab with all the mod cons and a bay view in Iqaluit (capital of Nunavut), South Baffin, would cost you around £150 000. Get in before the permafrost starts to melt and drive up demand and you'll make a killing!

  • Greenimp

    10 December 2011 10:06PM

    Obama is compromised in everything he does,it tends to suggest that American politics needs fundamental reform. Lobbyists are ruining UK politics too,with the likes of non-scientist Lord Lawson having influence despite his limited brain cell count (he was another fool like Gordon Brown in ruining the UK economy ,hardly a recommendation ). The recession must make people realise that they cannot go on wasting the world's resources and pumping out carbon thereby poisoning the Earth and the futures of their own descendents. Were Westerners ever so greedy in human history as they have become in the credit booms of the Eighties (US) and the Nineties and Noughties ? The politicians of most Western countries are in the pay of the lobbyists,and the UK has an alcohol crisis because all 3 parties receive a lot of donations from big businesses pushing their alcohol brands.

Comments on this page are now closed.

Bestsellers from the Guardian shop

Guardian Bookshop

This week's bestsellers

  1. 1.  London's Lost Rivers

    by Paul Talling £9.99

  2. 2.  Atlantic

    by Simon Winchester £9.99

  3. 3.  Teach Yourself Volcanoes, Earthquakes and Tsunamis

    by David Rothery £10.99

  4. 4.  Cloudspotter's Guide

    by Gavin Pretor-Pinney £9.99

  5. 5.  Cloud Collector's Handbook

    by Gavin Pretor-Pinney £10.00