• Site Search
  • Search Local Business Listings

MY VIEW, Congressman Spencer Bachus: My reputation important to me and you

Published: Sunday, January 08, 2012, 5:15 AM

By Spencer Bachus

Spencer Bachus.jpgU.S. Rep. Spencer Bachus. (The Birmingham News/Hal Yeager)

As your congressman, I view my character and reputation as not only my business, but yours.

A book titled "Throw Them All Out" by Peter Schweizer is premised on the allegation that while Americans were losing their life savings in the financial crisis of 2008, members of Congress were getting rich by trading on inside information. While purposely designed to inflame, it was certainly not true for my wife, Linda, and me.

Although the author asserts I was among those members who profited, like many Americans, my wife and I lost a third of the value of our mutual fund, stock and pension savings in 2008.

The author further attempts to build animosity by claiming Congress is exempt from insider-trading laws. The truth is completely the opposite, as the director of enforcement for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has stated repeatedly under oath. I have never traded on insider information.

Still, these facts did not prevent the author from launching into a long diatribe of false innuendoes concerning my financial investments. Books like this are a dime a dozen, because scandal sells, and distrust of Congress is at an all-time high.

Perhaps the clearest indication of bias is a lengthy story of how then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson received a disturbing private phone call from General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt on Sept. 8, 2008, about difficulties that GE was having financing its operations. The author theorizes with no justification that I may have been told this "inside information" and personally profited by "shorting" the company's stock.

The fundamental problem is I did not short-sell GE. I did the exact opposite and bought it on the belief it was a great company and was undervalued.

Contacted by CNBC's Kudlow Report on Nov. 17, I agreed to debate the author on this claim and other untruths. He backed out at the last minute. Challenged by host Larry Kudlow during a later interview, he admitted he was wrong about GE.

The author also alleged that I bought a fund of financial stocks in July 2008, contradicting my stated policy of not investing in companies under the jurisdiction of the Financial Services Committee which I now chair. In fact, as CNBC accurately reported, the fund consisted entirely of energy stocks. But no apology for this fabrication has been made.

Nevertheless, a "60 Minutes" report based on the false allegations in the book also insinuated that I traded financial stocks by displaying a GE logo. In truth, GE was not listed as a financial company by the SEC or New York Stock Exchange during the period I held it.

In addition, a bogus claim has been made that investors and the public were kept in the dark about an alleged "private briefing" on the deteriorating U.S. economy held by Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Sept. 18, 2008.

In reality, it was a well-publicized meeting attended by congressional leadership at the U.S. Capitol Building. The so-called "secret meeting" was widely reported by the wire services beforehand and the meeting's participants held a news conference immediately afterwards that was covered by every major media outlet. Pictures appeared on the front pages of many newspapers the next morning.

In a Wall Street Journal column labeling this a "nonscandal," Holman Jenkins wrote, "In reality, who on September 19 wasn't warning of a financial meltdown? Look at the papers from that day -- news of what Messrs. Bernanke and Paulson said was everywhere before the markets opened."

The public rightly demands that elected officials conduct themselves honorably. Financial disclosure has long been considered the best safeguard. But it may be that the only way to completely address even the perception of a conflict of interest and false allegations is for members of Congress not to trade or to place their holdings in a blind trust.

It is hurtful when loved ones, neighbors and church members read and hear falsehoods attacking your character made and repeated in the media. But negative and personal attacks intended to create controversy and fear do not succeed.

As your representative, please be assured that I will continue to strive to serve you with joy and optimism.

Spencer Bachus of Vestavia Hills represents Alabama's 6th Congressional District. Email: CongressmanBachus@mail.house.gov.

Inappropriate post? Alert us.

Sponsored Links




Comments Feed

View: Oldest first | Newest first
GoBlazers7120 January 08, 2012 at 6:16AM

He and his wife lost 1/3 of their savings during the financial crisis. How can that be "inside information?" Glad to see Bachus coming out and fighting these allegations because people were starting to wonder. He will always have my vote and I'm sorry to see him pulled through the mud like this.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
bhamliberal January 08, 2012 at 8:47AM

Did it occur to you that he lost 1/3 because he was a lousy trader? I have a background in business/finance and read what he said carefully. I found his carefully constructed alibi not very convincing. All public servants should have their investments put into a blind trust that only invests in mutual funds or ETFs.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Bobila January 08, 2012 at 10:43AM

"I have never traded on insider information " Bachus says. Sounds a bit like I never had sex with that woman.
Rep Bachus,if your reputation and character are such prized possessions,what is stopping you from suing Peter Schweizer ? Aggressively fight these allegations or step down.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
tiger43 January 08, 2012 at 12:39PM

How do you know that may not be a possibility? Just because it hasn't been done yet doesn't mean he may not do it.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
BrianO'Alabaster January 08, 2012 at 11:25AM

The record of your trades sure looks like a duck.
Your obfsucation and factless denials sure sound like a duck.
Your weak attempt to tie the voters to your reputation sure walks like a duck.
Now man up, take personal responsibility for your actions, and tell the truth. Assuming you still remember how to do that.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
crapshoot January 08, 2012 at 1:08PM

Spencer Bachus is LYING again - He is thinking that you are stupid enough to believe it.
He is hoping that you are disconnected enough not to know the truth.
He is as corrupt as they come. If you vote him in again - Shame ON YOU!
There are newspaper stories that quote Bachus Support Obama, Supporting More Gun Control and voting for TARP that gave BILLIONS to the very banks that give him campaign donations.
Go ahead and believe his lies - get screwed again for another 2 years - hope you like it

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
tiger43 January 08, 2012 at 11:06PM

Crap.....support Obama?? LOL....the sad part about your post is that you are legally allowed to walk amoung society! Oh, and that you are allowed to vote. That has to be the funniest thing I have ever heard.....he does not support Obama!

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
crapshoot January 08, 2012 at 1:47PM

Spencer Bachus is a puppet, a tool of the big banks.
Do not believe a word that he says.
TARP has his fingerprints all over it.
Bailout Bachus must be defeated - now - this year.
We someone please run against him

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
truthandpeace January 09, 2012 at 2:55AM

“Although the author asserts I was among those members who profited, like many Americans, my wife and I lost a third of the value of our mutual fund, stock and pension savings in 2008.”

That wasn’t the subject of the “60 Minutes” Program, it was about you Profiting from Stocks you allegedly purchased with “INSIDER INFORMATION” and had nothing to do with your pension Plan, mutual funds and any other stocks, other than those you allegedly purchased with “INSIDER INFORMATION, you are only seeking to divert the attention from what the REAL ISSUE is in this case, aren’t you Congressman Bachus?

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
truthandpeace January 09, 2012 at 3:06AM

“The public rightly demands that elected officials conduct themselves honorably. Financial disclosure has long been considered the best safeguard. But it may be that the only way to completely address even the perception of a conflict of interest and false allegations is for members of Congress not to trade or to place their holdings in a blind trust.”

Presidents of the United States and members of Congress of the United States at one time placed their Holdings in a Blind Trust, until Ronald Reagan became President of the United States of America, didn’t they Congressman Bachus?

Those Honorable Politicians who seek to protect their Reputation have placed their Holdings in Blind Trust, but there are few Politicians, and from what you posted above, you haven’t been one of those Honorable politicians who chose to place your Holdings in a Blind Trust, have you been, Congressman Bachus?

BTW, Preachers and Moralist have for years, defined a person’s Character as what a person is in the dark alone, while their reputation is what others say about them, so you are the only person who can control your Character, and your actions, define what others think and say about you, isn’t that the TRUTH, Congressman Bachus?

You have had the option to place your “holdings” in a Blind Trust as many Politicians before you have done, but you didn’t choose that option, did you Congressman Bachus?

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
au55 January 09, 2012 at 4:57AM

Bachus can lie with the best of them!!!

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
bhamliberal January 09, 2012 at 7:46AM

I know a very smart guy with no ties to big money who inquired about running against Bachus. He was told by the Dem Party folks it would take $1M minimum. He walked away. Take the money out of politics and maybe us regular folks might have a chance.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Truconserv January 09, 2012 at 10:37AM

Hard to believe you Spencer when you promised term limits over 20 years ago. Your actions have spoke louder than your words!

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Truconserv January 09, 2012 at 10:38AM

Sorry--should have been "spoken"

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new

Most Active Users

What's this?
Users with the most al.com comments in the last 7 days
Pommostaclenes Pommostaclenes
BCSNC BCSNC
Victory80 Victory80
tidepriden09 tidepriden09
Hagar the horrible 2012 Hagar the horrible 2012

Users We Love


Popular Tags

What's this?