• Site Search
  • Search Local Business Listings

Northern Beltline route details released by Alabama Department of Transportation prior to hearings

Published: Thursday, September 22, 2011, 5:30 AM

Screen shot 2011-09-19 at 9.48.19 PM.pngView full size(Alabama Department of Transportation)

A newly released document by the Alabama Department of Transportation provides the most detailed mapping of where the proposed Northern Beltline around Birmingham would go.

It also contains a timeline stretching out more than 20 years for the construction of the 52-mile beltline, which would follow an east-west arc from Interstate 59 near Argo to I-20/59 south of Birmingham.

The document, posted on the department's website at dot.alabama.gov Monday evening in advance of public hearings being held next week in Gardendale and Bessemer, includes segment-by-segment satellite images with overlays of the six-lane interstate and its interchanges with other roads. The Federal Highway Administration estimates that the project will cost $4.7 billion over the course of 25 years.

An initial environmental impact study conducted on the project in 1997 estimated that 279 houses and 16 businesses would have to be relocated to make way for the road. Because of growth in the corridor and refinements to the design, that relocation number has jumped to a total of 520 relocations -- 485 residences and 35 businesses.

ALDOT has finished buying land for one 3.4-mile segment of the beltline, connecting Alabama 79 and Alabama 75 near Pinson.

According to the schedule, construction on that segment could start next year. By 2013, ALDOT expects to start buying land for segments from Alabama 79 west to Interstate 65. The beltline would intersect with I-65 just north of Gardendale.

ALDOT doesn't schedule any land buying in the other direction --from Alabama 75 to I-59 -- until 2025. And land acquisition on the western leg -- from U.S. 78 to the junction of I-459 and I-20/59 -- isn't scheduled to start until 2031.

Proponents of the project hope Alabama's congressional representatives can secure extra federal money that would speed the project along.

The newly released document indicates that ALDOT has been working with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service this year over endangered species protection. The streams in the segment from Alabama 79 to Alabama 75 were surveyed for the presence of watercress darters, rush darters and vermilion darters, endangered fish known to be present in nearby streams. None were found, and according to ALDOT the habitat in the area was unsuitable for watercress darters and rush darters and was marginal for vermilion darters. "Based on the survey, the presence of any of the target species in the study area appears highly unlikely," ALDOT reports.

The document released this week was just a summary of a larger ongoing re-evaluation of the entire Northern Beltline project. According to ALDOT spokesman Tony Harris, the full re-evaluation document will be made public when it is completed. ALDOT is also working on an assessment of the indirect and cumulative impacts of the roadway and an updated environmental impact study for the western half of the project.


Join the conversation by clicking to comment or email Spencer at tspencer@bhamnews.com.


Related topics: ALDOT, Northern Beltline

Sponsored Links



More stories in Breaking News from The Birmingham News

Previous story
Birmingham to host first in series of national AIDS strategy meetings
Next story
Metro Birmingham forecast: Rainy day possible

Comments Feed

View: Oldest first | Newest first
tcarl September 22, 2011 at 5:51AM

Unlikely in the current budget crush-crunch-crash that more money will be found this year for a faster construction schedule for the Northern.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
eee222 September 22, 2011 at 6:22AM

"Proponents of the project hope Alabama's congressional representatives can secure extra federal money that would speed the project along." Are you kidding me? If anyone hasn't noticed "Grandad" is broke.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
bamahoops100 September 22, 2011 at 6:33AM

I thought road construction was paid for from federal and state gas tax? As long as we continue to buy gas, they will not go broke. I guess there is to muck to do on the "southern beltline" to worry about the northern beltline. I predict none us will live long enough to witness completion.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
SandLord1 September 22, 2011 at 7:45AM

I agree, don't expect to live long enough to see completion. Surprising that only a small segment of land has been acquired; land prices go UP, not down.

I remember news headlines when Fob James instituted a TEMPORARY hike on fuel taxes "to pay for roads...". Temporary in this state means FOREVER.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
truthseeker September 22, 2011 at 8:20AM

An initial environmental impact study conducted on the project in 1997 estimated that 279 houses and 16 businesses would have to be relocated to make way for the road. Because of growth in the corridor and refinements to the design, that relocation number has jumped to a total of 520 relocations -- 485 residences and 35 businesses.


This little excerpt from the ALDOT study fails to mention that the 1997 US EPA letter not recommended the route is still nowhere in the EIS documents. And if residents and businesses have doubleed since that time, more reason that alternative routes should be studies. Also the study fails to mention that I-59 in Trussville/Argo will be flooded with traffic because you have to go 9 miles to access the NB. TOTAL WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
tumbleweed September 22, 2011 at 8:23AM

Proponents of the project hope Alabama's congressional representatives can secure extra federal money that would speed the project along.

So what are ALABAMA politicians going to do, ask the federal government to print some more money. Get real, we are in a trillion dollar deficit. I think the public should tell the BBA and its politicians to put their efforts to something that makes sense.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
mouser2 September 22, 2011 at 3:54PM

It should have been built when I-459 was built. Imagine the growth that would have taken place!

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
BhamIsOk September 27, 2011 at 11:34PM

I believe it was George Wallace who said: "no one ever got elected by building a road but plenty have been elected by promising to build a road". That's all this is: a promise. It will never happen. Birmingham metro is on life support now. Building a road around the outside would only serve to quarantine the dying areas from the healthy growth areas. That will never happen. Pipe dream.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new

Most Active Users

What's this?
Users with the most al.com comments in the last 7 days
Pommostaclenes Pommostaclenes
BCSNC BCSNC
Victory80 Victory80
Hagar the horrible 2012 Hagar the horrible 2012
papatony papatony

Users We Love


Popular Tags

What's this?