Facing opposition to his health care reform proposals, President Barack Obama has decided to reach out to a key demographic: morons."

-- From the "news" story, "In Move to Appease Critics, Obama Promises to Extend Health Care Coverage to Morons."

Borowitz Report

Page last updated: 8:35 a.m., August 20, 2009
42% say U.S. winning in Afghan.  |   2 health-care bills?   |   435K clunkers exchanged

8 a.m. ET: If yesterday's health-care narrative was all about message, today's is focused on legislative tactics, not about selling a reform bill but the mechanics of getting one passed.

The Wall Street Journal writes, "The White House and Senate Democratic leaders, seeing little chance of bipartisan support for their health-care overhaul, are considering a strategy shift that would break the legislation into two parts and pass the most expensive provisions solely with Democratic votes." Under that scenario, Democrats would move a big chunk of their bill under reconciliation, which would only require 51 votes to pass. The Journal pegs the chance of that happening at an oddly specific 60 percent. But are leaders really that serious about this idea, or is it another threat designed to increase pressure on Republicans and moderate Democrats? The Washington Post reports leaders "have not, however, stepped up preparations to draft a Democratic bill or to use ... reconciliation" to get a measure through. Politico notes President Obama "would face a minefield of obstacles under the reconciliation process because opponents could strike anything from the bill that the Senate parliamentarian deems not directly related the budget."

Perhaps instead of two bills, Democrats just need to move a smaller bill. Chuck Grassley told the Post that after seeing so much anger at town-hall meetings, he believes "lawmakers should consider drastically scaling back the scope of the effort." Kaiser Health News says that many experts agree with Grassley that "Democrats will have to scale back the cost and scope of the legislation to get something through Congress this year." Obama, meanwhile, said Wednesday that passing health-care reform was "“a core ethical and moral obligation.” He will attempt to reach two different audiences on health care today, reaching out to conservatives through Michael Smerconish's radio show before preaching to the choir a bit at an Organizing for America rally.

Continue Reading »
The AfPak Crystal Ball Foreign Policy | Experts offer candidate primer and predictions on Afghanistan elections.
Co-ops a viable alternative? Los Angeles Times | The latest debate over health-care reform.
Tarantino Stalks History and Hitler Time | A dissection of Inglourious Basterds.
White House tries to regain message control Politico | Obama turns to grassroots for help.

The White House has been in a defensive flight forward fit ever since Lyndon LaRouche and LaRouchePAC exposed his Nazi health reform."

-- the LaRouchePAC on its role in health-care reform protests.

Washington Independent

C.I.A. Sought Blackwater’s Help in Plan to Kill Jihadists New York Times | Did they overbill for the work?
New Rx for Health Plan: Split Bill Wall Street Journal | Hard for Dems to use reconciliation and still get the reforms they want.
Kennedy, Looking Ahead, Urges That Senate Seat Be Filled Quickly Boston Globe | Not clear whether Democrats could get away with allowing appointment now, after changing law when Romney was governor.
'Cash for Clunkers' Won't Be Running Much Longer, Government Says Los Angeles Times | Will Michigan delegation push to extend program again?
Don't Sweat It New Republic | Obama looked like he was in trouble last August, too. Remember how that turned out.
Recent images (click to enlarge):
See All Photos »
Public Opinion in U.S. Turns Against the War Jennifer Agiesta and Jon Cohen
Senator Calls for Narrower Measure Lori Montgomery and Perry Bacon Jr.
Iraq Carnage Shows Sectarian War Goes On Ernesto Londoño and Greg Jaffe

» More: The Fix | 44 | Post Politics

© 2009 The Washington Post Company