Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Nerve Grafting Followed by Standard Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction in Treating Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00080808
First received: April 7, 2004
Last updated: July 27, 2012
Last verified: July 2012

April 7, 2004
July 27, 2012
August 2001
July 2006   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Potency rate at 2 years after surgery [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Potency rate at 2 years after surgery
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00080808 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
  • Time to first spontaneous erection
  • Quality of nocturnal erection as objectively measured by the Rigiscan
 
 
 
Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Nerve Grafting Followed by Standard Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction in Treating Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
A Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating the Importance of Early Erectile Dysfunction Rehabilitation and Unilateral Autologous Sural Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

RATIONALE: Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with nerve grafting followed by standard therapies for erectile dysfunction may be effective in helping patients with prostate cancer improve sexual satisfaction and quality of life. It is not yet known whether erectile dysfunction therapy and nerve-sparing prostatectomy are more effective with or without nerve grafting.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying nerve grafting and standard therapy to see how well they work compared to standard therapy alone in treating erectile dysfunction in patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare the efficacy of erectile dysfunction rehabilitation and unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral autologous interposition sural nerve grafting in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
  • Compare potency rates in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare erection quality in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare time to return of spontaneous erectile activity in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the feasibility of these regimens in these patients.
  • Compare quality of life and sexual satisfaction in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare changes in penile erectile length and circumference in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the relative morbidity of patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with unilateral autologous interposition sural nerve grafting.

Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, patients undergo erectile dysfunction rehabilitation comprising any of the following: oral sildenafil (as occasion requires), use of vacuum erection device over 10 minutes once daily, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly, or MUSE (suppository in urethra for erections) therapy. Erectile dysfunction rehabilitation may continue for up to 2 years or until return of adequate spontaneous erectile activity.

  • Arm II: Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (without sural nerve grafting) and erectile dysfunction rehabilitation as in arm I.

In both arms, treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life and sexual history are assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks postoperatively, at 4, 8, 12, and 16 months, and then every 4 months for 2 years or until return of spontaneous erectile activity.

Patients are followed every 4 months for 2 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 200 patients (120 for arm I and 80 for arm II) will be accrued for this study.

Interventional
Phase 2
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Prostate Cancer
  • Drug: Alprostadil (E1)
    Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly
    Other Names:
    • Prostaglandin E1
    • PGE1
  • Drug: Papaverine
    Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly
    Other Names:
    • Paverine Injection
    • Papaverine Hydrochloride Injection
  • Drug: Phentolamine mesylate
    Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly
  • Drug: Sildenafil citrate
    Oral sildenafil as needed
    Other Name: Viagra
  • Procedure: conventional surgery
    Unilateral cavernous nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Other Name: prostatectomy
  • Active Comparator: Arm I
    Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with unilateral autologous interposition sural nerve grafting.
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Alprostadil (E1)
    • Drug: Papaverine
    • Drug: Phentolamine mesylate
    • Drug: Sildenafil citrate
    • Procedure: conventional surgery
  • Active Comparator: Arm II (No sural nerve grafting)
    Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (without sural nerve grafting) and erectile dysfunction rehabilitation as in arm I.
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Alprostadil (E1)
    • Drug: Papaverine
    • Drug: Phentolamine mesylate
    • Drug: Sildenafil citrate
    • Procedure: conventional surgery
Davis JW, Chang DW, Chevray P, Wang R, Shen Y, Wen S, Pettaway CA, Pisters LL, Swanson DA, Madsen LT, Huber N, Troncoso P, Babaian RJ, Wood CG. Randomized phase II trial evaluation of erectile function after attempted unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral sural nerve grafting for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1135-43. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
111
July 2009
July 2006   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient must be a candidate for a unilateral nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. a) Gleason score 7 or less in the cores on the side to be spared
  2. Patient must have no discernable preoperative erectile dysfunction, defined as the ability to have successful penetration on at least 75% of attempts.
  3. Patient must be </= 65 years of age at the time of study enrollment.
  4. Patient must have no peripheral neuropathy precluding procurement of a sural nerve graft
  5. Patient must have no significant psychiatric illness or demonstrable vasculogenic source of impotence.
  6. No prior history of pelvic irradiation or androgen deprivation therapy (LHRH agonists or anti-androgens)

Exclusion Criteria:

Male
up to 65 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00080808
ID01-304, P50CA090270, P30CA016672, MDA-ID-01304, CDR0000355366
No
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Study Chair: Christopher G. Wood, MD M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
July 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP