- Home
- » Systemwide
- » Laws & Policies
- » Infant Safe Haven Laws
Infant Safe Haven Laws: Summary of State Laws
Series: State Statutes |
Author(s):
Child Welfare Information Gateway
|
Year Published: 2010 |
Current Through May 2010
This brief introduction summarizes how States address this topic in statute. To access the statutes for a specific State or territory, visit the State Statutes Search.
Many State legislatures have enacted legislation to address infant abandonment and infanticide in response to a reported increase in the abandonment of infants. Beginning in Texas in 1999, "Baby Moses laws" or infant safe haven laws have been enacted as an incentive for mothers in crisis to safely relinquish their babies to designated locations where the babies are protected and provided with medical care until a permanent home is found. Safe haven laws generally allow the parent, or an agent of the parent, to remain anonymous and to be shielded from prosecution for abandonment or neglect in exchange for surrendering the baby to a safe haven.
To date, approximately 49 States and Puerto Rico have enacted safe haven legislation.1 The focus of these laws is protecting newborns. In approximately 13 States, infants who are 72 hours old or younger may be relinquished to a designated safe haven.2 Approximately 16 States and Puerto Rico accept infants up to 1 month old.3 Other States specify varying age limits in their statutes.4
Who May Leave a Baby at a Safe Haven
In most States with safe haven laws, either parent may surrender his or her baby to a safe haven. In four States, only the mother may relinquish her infant.5 Idaho specifies that only a custodial parent may surrender an infant. In approximately 11 States, an agent of the parent (someone who has the parent's approval) may take a baby to a safe haven for a parent.6 In California and Kansas, if the person relinquishing the infant is someone other than a parent, he or she must have legal custody of the child. Seven States do not specify the person who may relinquish an infant.7
Safe Haven Providers
The purpose of safe haven laws is to ensure that relinquished infants are left with persons who can provide the immediate care needed for their safety and well-being. To that end, approximately 12 States require parents to relinquish their infants to a hospital or health-care facility.8 Other States designate additional entities as safe haven providers, including emergency medical services, police stations, and fire stations. In seven States, emergency medical technicians, including personnel responding to 9-1-1 calls, may accept an infant.9 In addition, four States and Puerto Rico allow churches to act as safe havens, but the relinquishing parent must first determine that church personnel are present at the time the infant is left.10 Generally, anyone on staff at these institutions can receive an infant; however, many States require that staff receiving an infant be trained in emergency medical care.
Responsibilities of Safe Haven Providers
The safe haven provider is required to accept emergency protective custody of the infant and to provide any immediate medical care that the infant may require. In 12 States, when the safe haven receiving the baby is not a hospital, the baby must be transferred to a hospital as soon as possible.11 The provider is also required to notify the local child welfare department that an infant has been relinquished.
In 25 States, the provider is required to ask the parent for family and medical history information.12 In 17 States, the provider is required to attempt to give the parent or parents information about the legal repercussions of leaving the infant and information about referral services.13 In four States, a copy of the infant's numbered identification bracelet may be offered to the parent as an aid to linking the parent to the child if reunification is sought at a later date.14
Immunity From Liability for Providers
Safe haven providers are given protection from liability for anything that might happen to the infant while in their care, unless there is evidence of major negligence on the part of the provider.
Protections for the Parents
In approximately 12 States, anonymity for the parent or agent of the parent is expressly guaranteed in statute.15 In 24 States and Puerto Rico, the safe haven provider cannot compel the parent or agent of the parent to provide identifying information.16 In addition, 13 States provide an assurance of confidentiality for any information that is voluntarily provided by the parent.17
In addition to the guarantee of anonymity, most States provide protection from criminal liability for parents who safely relinquish their infants. Approximately 33 States and Puerto Rico do not prosecute a parent for child abandonment when a baby is relinquished to a safe haven.18 In 16 States, safe relinquishment of the infant is an affirmative defense in any prosecution of the parent or his/her agent for any crime against the child, such as abandonment, neglect, or child endangerment.19
The privileges of anonymity and immunity will be forfeited in most States if there is evidence of child abuse or neglect.
Consequences of Relinquishment
Once the safe haven provider has notified the local child welfare department that an infant has been relinquished, the department assumes custody of the infant as an abandoned child. The department has responsibility for placing the infant, usually in a preadoptive home, and for petitioning the court for termination of the birth parent's parental rights. Before the baby is placed in a preadoptive home, 13 States require the department to request the local law enforcement agency to determine whether the baby has been reported as a missing child.20 In addition, five States require the department to check the putative father registry before a termination of parental rights petition can be filed.21
Approximately 20 States have procedures in place for a parent to reclaim the infant, usually within a specified time period and before any petition to terminate parental rights has been granted.22 Five States also have provisions for a nonrelinquishing father to petition for custody of the child.23 In 16 States and Puerto Rico, the act of surrendering an infant to a safe haven is presumed to be a relinquishment of parental rights to the child, and no further parental consent is required for the child's adoption.24
To see how your State addresses this issue, visit the State Statutes Search.
To find information on all of the States and territories, view the complete printable PDF, Infant Safe Haven Laws: Summary of State Laws. (PDF - 447 KB)
1 The word approximately is used to stress the fact that the States frequently amend their laws. This information is current only through May 2010. Nebraska, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands currently do not address the issue of abandoned newborns in legislation. back
2 Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Tennessee, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin. back
3 Arkansas, Connecticut, Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont, and West Virginia. back
4 Other limits include 5 days (New York), 7 days (Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, North Carolina, and Oklahoma), 10 days (Maryland), 14 days (Delaware, Iowa, Virginia, and Wyoming), 21 days (Alaska), 45 days (Indiana and Kansas), 60 days (South Dakota and Texas), 90 days (New Mexico), and 1 year (Missouri and North Dakota). back
5 Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, and Tennessee. Maryland and Minnesota do allow the mother to approve another person to deliver the infant on her behalf. back
6 Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, New Jersey, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Utah, and Wyoming. back
7 Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, New Mexico, South Carolina, and Vermont. back
8 Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Iowa, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virginia, and West Virginia. back
9 Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Virginia. back
10 Arizona, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Vermont. back
11 Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Wyoming. back
12 Alaska, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. back
13 Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Washington, and Wisconsin. back
14 California, Connecticut, Delaware, and North Dakota. back
15 Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. back
16 Alaska, Arizona, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. back
17 California, Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. back
18 Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin. back
19 In a State with an affirmative defense provision, a parent or agent of the parent can be charged and prosecuted, but the act of leaving the baby safely at a safe haven can be a defense to such charges. The States with an affirmative defense provision include Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Indiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming. back
20 California, Delaware, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Montana, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming. back
21 Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Utah, and Wyoming. back
22 California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. back
23 Hawaii, Missouri, Montana, South Dakota, and Tennessee. back
24 Alaska, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin. back
This publication is a product of the State Statutes Series prepared by Child Welfare Information Gateway. While every attempt has been made to be as complete as possible, additional information on these topics may be in other sections of a State's code as well as agency regulations, case law, and informal practices and procedures.
This material may be freely reproduced and distributed. However, when doing so, please credit Child Welfare Information Gateway.