Adjustable Continence Therapy (ACT) Device for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Uromedica
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00113555
First received: June 8, 2005
Last updated: June 10, 2011
Last verified: May 2011

June 8, 2005
June 10, 2011
December 2001
July 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Pad weight [ Time Frame: 2009 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
If pad weight test done for 24hr period over 18month,demonstrates a reduction of 50% or more the result is considered a success of the device.
  • Efficacy: Determine whether use of the ACT device results in a mean reduction from baseline in Stamey score of greater than or equal to one grade at twelve months post implant.
  • Safety: Characterize the frequency of complications that occur among subjects implanted with the ACT system at the time of the procedure and continuing through the 12-month follow-up.
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00113555 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
  • Assess the clinical utility of the ACT device in improving patient's quality of life.
  • Characterize the safety of the ACT device by quantifying the risk of anticipated and unanticipated adverse events.
  • Evaluate the technical feasibility of the delivery system to position the prosthetic at the bladder neck.
  • To assess the ability to adjust the amount of urethral coaptation and bladder neck support post-operatively.
 
 
 
Adjustable Continence Therapy (ACT) Device for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
Clinical Investigation of an Adjustable Continence Therapy (ACT) Periurethral Prosthetic System for Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence With or Without Hypermobility

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive surgical procedure in up to 160 implanted female patients in which two adjustable balloons (one on each side of the urethra) are implanted to treat urinary stress incontinence.

The results will be analyzed to demonstrate the effects of the device as well as its associated risks. Therapeutic success will be based on whether the patients demonstrate at least a one-grade (mean) reduction in the Stamey score at 12 months.

This is a multi-center, prospective, non randomized clinical trial comparing baseline data to the 12 month data. Urodynamic testing, pad weights and a direct visual stress test will be used to determine success along with the Stamey score.

Interventional
Phase 2
Phase 3
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Urinary Incontinence
Device: ACT (Adjustable Continence Therapy)
surgically implanted device
Experimental: Experimental
Open Label Study
Intervention: Device: ACT (Adjustable Continence Therapy)
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
221
November 2010
July 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women
  • 18 years or older
  • Diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence with or without urethral hypermobility
  • Willing to sign informed consent
  • Candidates for surgical intervention for stress incontinence
  • Negative urinalysis or urine culture within 2 weeks of implantation
  • Normal cystourethroscopy
  • Failed at least 6 months of previous treatments for stress urinary incontinence (e.g., exercise regimen, electrical stimulation, surgical procedures, etc.)
  • May have failed suspension or sling procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Life expectancy of less than one year
  • Insulin dependant diabetic
  • Auto-immune disease
  • Undergoing radiation therapy
  • Active urinary tract infection
  • Detrusor instability refractory to meds
  • Reduced bladder compliance
  • Significant bladder residual >100mls
  • Bladder cancer
  • Unsuccessfully treated bladder stones
  • Current urethral stricture preventing the passage of a 24 FR endoscope
  • Neurogenic bladder
  • Uncorrected rectocele, cystocele, urethrocele, enterocele or pelvic prolapse of Grade 3 or higher
  • Prior pelvic radiotherapy
  • Artificial urinary sphincter implanted
Female
18 Years and older
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States,   Canada
 
NCT00113555
URM01-01-01
No
Sabitha R Shriram ,Sr.Clinical Research Specialist, Uromedica Inc.
Uromedica
 
Study Director: Tim Cook Uromedica, Inc.
Uromedica
May 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP