Clinical Comparison of RPDs Retained by Conical and Galvanoformed Double Crowns.

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified July 2005 by University of Heidelberg.
Recruitment status was  Active, not recruiting
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
University of Heidelberg
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00176215
First received: September 13, 2005
Last updated: NA
Last verified: July 2005
History: No changes posted

September 13, 2005
September 13, 2005
May 2003
 
 
 
No Changes Posted
 
 
 
 
 
Clinical Comparison of RPDs Retained by Conical and Galvanoformed Double Crowns.
 

The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to investigate the clinical performance and complication rate of RPDs (Removable partial dentures) retained on conventional conical double crowns in comparison to galvanoformed telscopic double crowns. Additionally the OHIP (Oral Health related Qualitiy of Life)and the abrasion of the teeth were investigated.

 
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Denture, Partial, Removable
  • Dental Prosthesis Retention
  • Oral Health
  • Tooth Abrasion
Procedure: survival failure of more than 20 %
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
 
 
 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for RPDs retained by double crowns; 2 to 6 Abutment teeth;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • limited contractual capability and absence of consent of the patient
Both
18 Years and older
 
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Germany
 
NCT00176215
CG-FL-1
 
 
University of Heidelberg
 
Study Chair: Christiane Grossmann, DDS University of Heidelberg
Principal Investigator: Franziska Lehmann, DDS University of Heidelberg
University of Heidelberg
July 2005

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP