Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Intervention for Stroke Caregivers (TASK II)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of the revised Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK II) compared with an Information, Support, and Referral (ISR) intervention in family caregivers of stroke survivors. We will also test if TASK II intervention effects on primary outcomes (depressive symptoms, caregiving-related negative life changes, unhealthy days) are mediated through effects on secondary outcomes (task difficulty, optimism, threat appraisal). Comparative costs and outcomes for the TASK II and ISR interventions will also be explored.
Condition | Intervention | Phase |
---|---|---|
Stroke Family Caregivers |
Behavioral: Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK II) Behavioral: Information, Support, and Referral (ISR) |
Phase 3 |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
Official Title: | Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Intervention for Stroke Caregivers |
- Depressive symptoms: Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9) [ Time Frame: Change in depressive symptoms from baseline to 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Among caregivers who screen positive for depressive symptoms at baseline, those randomized to the TASK II intervention will have a greater reduction in depressive symptoms compared to those randomized to the ISR group from baseline to 8 weeks, after controlling for selected covariates. Long-term, sustained efficacy will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year.
- Caregiving-related negative life changes: Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS) [ Time Frame: Change in caregiving-related negative life changes from baseline to 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Caregivers randomized to the TASK II group will have a greater reduction in caregiving-related negative life changes compared with those randomized to the ISR group from baseline to 8 weeks, after controlling for selected covariates. Long-term, sustained efficacy will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year.
- Unhealthy days: Unhealthy Days (UD) [ Time Frame: Change in unhealthy days from baseline to 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Caregivers randomized to the TASK II group will have a greater reduction in unhealthy days compared with those randomized to the ISR group from baseline to 8 weeks, after controlling for selected covariates. Long-term, sustained efficacy will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year.
- Task difficulty: Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale Difficulty Subscale (OCBS) [ Time Frame: Change in task difficulty from baseline to 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Caregivers randomized to the TASK II group will have a greater reduction in task difficulty compared with those randomized to the ISR group from baseline to 8 weeks, after controlling for selected covariates. Long-term, sustained efficacy will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year.
- Optimism: Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R) [ Time Frame: Change in optimism from baseline to 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Caregivers randomized to the TASK II group will have a greater increase in optimism compared with those randomized to the ISR group from baseline to 8 weeks, after controlling for selected covariates. Long-term, sustained efficacy will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year.
- Threat appraisal: Appraisal of Caregiving Threat Subscale (ACS) [ Time Frame: Change in threat appraisal from baseline to 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Caregivers randomized to the TASK II group will have a greater reduction in threat appraisal compared with those randomized to the ISR group from baseline to 8 weeks, after controlling for selected covariates. Long-term, sustained efficacy will be assessed at 12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year.
Estimated Enrollment: | 220 |
Study Start Date: | May 2010 |
Estimated Study Completion Date: | February 2015 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date: | August 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Arms | Assigned Interventions |
---|---|
Experimental: Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK II)
The TASK II group will fill out a checklist about their needs and concerns, and will receive written tip sheets by mail that address the needs and concerns that they feel are most important. A nurse will call by telephone (lasting about 30 minutes or less) once a week for a total of 8 weeks, with another call at 12 weeks, to provide more information, answer questions, and to discuss more written tip sheets based on the caregiver's needs and concerns.
|
Behavioral: Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK II) |
Active Comparator: Information, Support, and Referral (ISR)
The ISR group will receive existing educational materials about stroke and caregiving developed by the American Stroke Association and weekly telephone calls by a nurse (lasting about 30 minutes or less) for a total of 8 weeks, with another call at 12 weeks.
|
Behavioral: Information, Support, and Referral (ISR) |
Detailed Description:
Stroke is the number one cause of disability in the United States, and over 4 million stroke survivors are alive today. Many stroke survivors need the help of a family caregiver. A family caregiver is a family member or close friend who helps the stroke survivor once they go home. Many caregivers need information and support during the first few months after the stroke survivor is discharged home. One group of caregivers will receive the TASK II intervention and another group of caregivers will receive existing educational materials about stroke and caregiving through an information, support, and referral (ISR) process. Both groups of caregivers will receive written materials about stroke and caregiving by mail and weekly telephone calls by a nurse for a total of 8 weeks, with an additional call at 12 weeks. A research assistant will also call by telephone at the beginning of the study, and at 8, 12, and 24 weeks after the beginning of the study, with a follow-up call at 1 year to interview both groups of caregivers about their caregiving activities and about their own health and well-being. If shown to be efficacious, our next goal will be to translate the TASK II intervention into practice settings to meet current recommendations and guidelines that emphasize follow up care for stroke survivors and their family caregivers.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years and older |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary caregiver (unpaid family member or significant other) of a stroke survivor
- No more than 8 weeks after survivor discharged home
- Plans to be providing care for 1 year or longer
- Access to a telephone
- Willingness to participate in 9 calls from a nurse and 5 data collection interviews at designated study time points
Exclusion Criteria:
- Caregiver or survivor age < 21 years
- Caregiver denies that survivor has had a stroke
- Caregiver does not consider him or herself a caregiver, stating that the survivor is not impaired or is the same as before the stroke
- Caregiver has low task difficulty (OCBS task difficulty score < 16)
- Caregiver communication difficulties (e.g., hearing loss)
- Caregiver not fluent in the English language
- Caregiver 6-item MMSE score less than 4
- Survivor residing in a nursing home or long-term care facility
- Survivor or caregiver has a terminal illness (e.g., cancer, end of life condition with decreased life expectancy, renal failure requiring dialysis)
- Survivor or caregiver history of hospitalization for alcohol or drug abuse
- Survivor or caregiver history of severe mental illness (e.g., Alzheimer's, dementia, suicidal tendencies, severe untreated depression or manic depressive disorder, schizophrenia)
- Survivor or caregiver pregnancy
- Survivor or caregiver is a prisoner or on house arrest
Contact: Tamilyn Bakas, PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN | 317-274-4695 | tbakas@iupui.edu |
Contact: Nenette M. Jessup, MPH, CCRP | 317-274-7549 | ramercad@iupui.edu |
United States, Indiana | |
Indiana University School of Nursing | Recruiting |
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202 | |
Contact: Tamilyn Bakas, PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN 317-274-4695 tbakas@iupui.edu | |
Contact: Nenette M. Jessup, MPH, CCRP 317-274-7549 ramercad@iupui.edu | |
Principal Investigator: Tamilyn Bakas, PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN | |
Sub-Investigator: Barbara Habermann, PhD, RN | |
Sub-Investigator: Susan M. McLennon, PhD, RN | |
Sub-Investigator: Gwendolyn Morrison, PhD | |
Sub-Investigator: Michael T. Weaver, PhD, RN, FAAN |
Publications:
Responsible Party: | Indiana University |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01275495 History of Changes |
Other Study ID Numbers: | 1003-63, R01NR010388 |
Study First Received: | January 10, 2011 |
Last Updated: | March 28, 2012 |
Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Indiana University:
Stroke Family Caregivers Cerebrovascular Accident Carers Care Givers Depression |
Life change events Family health Quality of life Cost Intervention studies Clinical trial |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Stroke Cerebral Infarction Cerebrovascular Disorders Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases |
Nervous System Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Brain Infarction Brain Ischemia |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on October 18, 2012