FOR YOUR INFORMATION............................AUGUST 1, 1991 FTC STAFF SAYS CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE PROVIDERS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO "BUNDLE" SERVICE WITH EQUIPMENT Federal Trade Commission staff said today that consumers most likely would benefit from a regulatory change to allow cellular telephone service providers to "bundle" both service and telephone equipment into a package and offer it for less than the price of service and equipment sold separately. Currently, Federal Communications Commission rules prohibit providers of cellular service from bundling service and telephone equipment. An FCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking requested com- ments on whether to lift this ban on bundling by the cellular service providers it licenses, and staff of the FTC's Bureau of Economics has sent comments to the FCC in support of such a change. Because competitive harm from bundling is unlikely if no market power exists, the lack of market power is used as a first screen to separate beneficial or harmless bundling from poten- tially harmful bundling, the staff said. The FTC staff was unable to conclude that cellular service is produced in a com- petitively-structured market and adopted the assumption that competition from other communications services would be insuf- ficient to constrain cellular carriers from exercising market power. Consequently, the FTC staff could not exclude the possibility that bundling may be used for anticompetitive purposes. The theoretical potential that bundling can be used for anticompetitive purposes, however, does not imply bundling should be prohibited on a per se basis, staff said. A per se prohibi- tion of bundling would be appropriate only if the existence of a net anticompetitive effect is probable, and the costs of a case- by-case evaluation exceed the benefits from allowing bundling in limited circumstances, staff continued. Therefore, the FTC staff reviewed the possible pro-competitive and anticompetitive effects - more - Cellular Bundling--08/01/91) of bundling, including the use of bundling to pursue transaction- cost and promotional efficiencies, to monopolize the cellular equipment market, to price discriminate, and to evade rate-of- return regulation. In sum, staff said, the economic analysis showed that lifting the ban is unlikely to present an anticompetitive danger. If, in individual instances, bundling were to lead to anticom- petitive behavior, the activities could be reviewed under the antitrust laws, staff concluded. The comments represent the views of the staff of the FTC's Bureau of Economics. They are not necessarily the views of the Commission or any individual Commissioner. Copies of the FTC staff comments are available from the FTC's Public Reference Branch, Room 130, 6th Street and Penn- sylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580; 202-326-2222; TTY 202-326-2502. # # # MEDIA CONTACT: Bonnie Jansen, Office of Public Affairs 202-326-2161 STAFF CONTACT: Bruce Kobayashi, Bureau of Economics 202-326-3363 (cellular)