Comparison of Airtraq Versus MacIntosh Intubation Via Nasal Approach
The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified February 2009 by Kliniken Essen-Mitte.
Recruitment status was Recruiting
Recruitment status was Recruiting
Sponsor:
Kliniken Essen-Mitte
Information provided by:
Kliniken Essen-Mitte
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00847184
First received: February 11, 2009
Last updated: February 18, 2009
Last verified: February 2009
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Detailed Description:
Time, success rate, and number of optimising maneuvers for tracheal intubation via the nasal approach are not different when Aitraq technique is used compared to a standard MacIntosh blade.
Condition | Intervention |
---|---|
Tracheal Intubation |
Device: Intubation Device: Airtraq |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
Official Title: | Comparison of Airtraq vs. MacIntosh Intubation Via Nasal Approach |
Further study details as provided by Kliniken Essen-Mitte:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Time for intubation [ Time Frame: 10 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Success rate for intubation [ Time Frame: 10 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Estimated Enrollment: | 200 |
Study Start Date: | February 2009 |
Estimated Study Completion Date: | November 2009 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date: | November 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Arms | Assigned Interventions |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 1. Airtraq
Intubation with the use of the Airtraq technique
|
Device: Airtraq
Intubation with the use of the Airtraq technique
Other Name: Aitraq, Prodol Meditec S.A., Vizcaya, Spain
|
Active Comparator: 2. MacIntosh
Intubation using the standard MacIntosh blade
|
Device: Intubation
Intubation using the standard MacIntosh blade
|
Detailed Description:
One hundred adult patients with an expected easy intubation and 100 patients with an expected difficult intubation are enrolled. Intubations are performed by two experienced fully boarded anesthesiologists. The design of the study is prospective and randomised.
Eligibility
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Scheduled for nasal intubation
- Adult
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age under 18 years
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00847184
Locations
Germany | |
Prof. Dr. Harald Groeben | Recruiting |
Essen, Germany, 45136 | |
Contact: Harald Groeben, M.D. ##49 201 174 31109 h.groeben@kliniken-essen-mitte.de | |
Principal Investigator: Harald Groeben, M.D. |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Kliniken Essen-Mitte
Investigators
Principal Investigator: | Harald Groeben, M.D. | Kliniken Essen-Mitte |
More Information
Publications:
Keywords provided by Kliniken Essen-Mitte:
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 26, 2012
Publications:
Responsible Party: | Prof. Dr. Harald Groeben, Kliniken Essen-Mitte |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00847184 History of Changes |
Other Study ID Numbers: | Airtraqnasal2009 |
Study First Received: | February 11, 2009 |
Last Updated: | February 18, 2009 |
Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices |
Keywords provided by Kliniken Essen-Mitte:
nasal intubation Aitraq difficult intubation |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 26, 2012