Comparison of Nexfin Pulse Contour Analysis and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Measurement of Cardiac Output

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Joachim Saur, University Hospital Mannheim
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01639313
First received: July 9, 2012
Last updated: NA
Last verified: July 2012
History: No changes posted

July 9, 2012
July 9, 2012
June 2011
November 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
 
 
No Changes Posted
 
 
 
 
 
Comparison of Nexfin Pulse Contour Analysis and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Measurement of Cardiac Output
Is Arterial Pulse Contour Analysis Using Nexfin a New Option in the Non-invasive Measurement of Cardiac Output? - A Pilot Study

A growing interest in monitoring cardiac output (CO) non-invasively has emerged, however its determination has been difficult using the standard approaches. The aim of the study is to evaluate the accuracy and precision of pulse contour analysis (PCA) as compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

 
Observational
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
 
Probability Sample

Hemodynamically stable patients undergoing CMR

Cardiac Diseases
 
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
39
November 2011
November 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • indication for CMR

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindication for CMR
  • claustrophobia
  • no consent obtained
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Germany
 
NCT01639313
PCA_CMR_MA
 
Joachim Saur, University Hospital Mannheim
University Hospital Mannheim
 
 
University Hospital Mannheim
July 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP