Improving Bowel Preparation for the Colon Capsule

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified August 2012 by Queen's University
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Lawrence Hookey, Queen's University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01655095
First received: July 30, 2012
Last updated: August 1, 2012
Last verified: August 2012

July 30, 2012
August 1, 2012
July 2012
June 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Assessment of the Quality of the Bowel Preparation using a previously defined scale. [ Time Frame: Assessed at the time of review of the colon capsule images (from ingestion of capsule until the capsule is passed or the battery runs out--max 10 hrs) and at the time of colonoscopy on the same day (using a previously defined scale as described) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Cleansing Scale:

    • Poor: Mucosa obscured by opaque debris or turbid fluid
    • Fair: Portion of the mucosa obscured by turbid fluid and/or debris preventing visualization of polyps >5mm in size
    • Good: Fluid was clear and small pieces of debris not obscuring polyps >5mm
    • Excellent: Fluid was clear and either free of debris or only small pieces

    Bubble effect scale:

    • Significant: Bubbles interfere with the examination, >10% surface area obscured by bubbles.
    • Insignificant: No bubbles or bubbles that do not interfere with the examination, <10% of surface area obscured by bubbles.
  • Number of individuals who have a complete colon capsule study (ie. pass the colon capsule prior to colonoscopy) [ Time Frame: Assessed during the time of colon capsule image review ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Assessment of the Quality of the Bowel Preparation using a previously defined scale. [ Time Frame: Assessed during the time of colon capsule study review (within 1 month of the procedure) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Cleansing Scale:

    • Poor: Mucosa obscured by opaque debris or turbid fluid
    • Fair: Portion of the mucosa obscured by turbid fluid and/or debris preventing visualization of polyps >5mm in size
    • Good: Fluid was clear and small pieces of debris not obscuring polyps >5mm
    • Excellent: Fluid was clear and either free of debris or only small pieces

    Bubble effect scale:

    • Significant: Bubbles interfere with the examination, >10% surface area obscured by bubbles.
    • Insignificant: No bubbles or bubbles that do not interfere with the examination, <10% of surface area obscured by bubbles.
  • Number of individuals who have a complete colon capsule study (ie. pass the colon capsule prior to colonoscopy) [ Time Frame: Assessed during the time of colon capsule study review (within 1 month of the procedure) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01655095 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Assessment of patient tolerance of the bowel preparations. [ Time Frame: Assessed at the time of colon capsule ingestion (will cover time period from beginning of bowel preparation, as previously described, to ingestion of the colon capsule) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Survey questionnaire to be completed by participants at the time of the colon capsule endoscopy assessing the tolerability of the preparation and side effects.
  • Gastric emptying and small and large bowel transit time [ Time Frame: Assessed at the time the colon capsule images are reviewed (will be monitored from time of capsule ingestion until capsule is expelled or battery runs out--max 10 hours) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Determining the amount of time was required for the capsule to transit through the stomach, small bowel and large bowel for the two different preparations based on the images collected during the study.
  • Comparison of accurate identification of mucosal changes (ie. inflammation) and polyp detection with colonoscopy. [ Time Frame: Determined at the time of review of the colon capsule images (assessed from time of capsule ingestion until capsule is expelled or battery runs out--max. 10 hours) and assessed during the colonoscopy the same day. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Abnormalities identified at the time the colon capsule images are reviewed will be compared to the abnormalities identified during the time of colonoscopy documented in the colonoscopy report.
  • Assessment of patient tolerance of the bowel preparations. [ Time Frame: Assessed at the time of colon capsule ingestion (will cover time period from ingestion of bowel preparation to ingestion of the colon capsule) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Survey questionnaire to be completed by participants at the time of the colon capsule endoscopy assessing the tolerability of the preparation and side effects.
  • Gastric emptying and small and large bowel transit time [ Time Frame: Assessed at the time the colon capsule images are reviewed (within 1 month of the procedure). ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Determining the amount of time was required for the capsule to transit through the stomach, small bowel and large bowel for the two different preparations based on the images collected during the study.
  • Comparison of accurate identification of mucosal changes (ie. inflammation) and polyp detection with colonoscopy. [ Time Frame: Determined at the time of review of the colon capsule images (within 1 month of the procedure) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Abnormalities identified at the time the colon capsule images are reviewed will be compared to the abnormalities identified during the time of colonoscopy documented in the colonoscopy report.
 
 
 
Improving Bowel Preparation for the Colon Capsule
Improving Bowel Preparation for the Colon Capsule: Picosalax and Prucalopride vs. PEG and Prucalopride

Colon capsule endoscopy is a technology that has been developed as a noninvasive method of examining the large bowel. The biggest limitation to its use has been finding a bowel preparation that will both clean the colon adequately for good visualization of the mucosa and also help propel the capsule through the colon. Most studies have been conducted in Europe using bowel preparation medications that are not approved for use in North America.

The purpose of this study is to compare a combination of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and prucalopride to Picosalax and prucalopride to determine which regime will give a better colon cleanse for the colon capsule. Both PEG and Picosalax are bowel preparations that are used routinely for colonoscopy in Canada. Prucalopride is a new medication recently approved for use in Canada which improves intestinal motility and should help with colon capsule transit.

Patients who are being referred for colonoscopy will be enrolled in the study and randomized to one of the bowel preparation regimes. They will undergo a split-dose bowel preparation with either PEG or Picosalax, which is routine for colonoscopy. As part of the standard bowel preparation, patients randomized to the Picosalax group will take dulcolax three nights before the test and then again two nights before the test. The evening before the test patients will take either PEG 2L or one sachet of Picosalax. The following morning they will take another dose of either PEG 2L or one sachet of Picosalax. They will then ingest the colon capsule and a dose of Prucalopride that morning. After 7 hours they will return to the endoscopy unit where they will undergo a colonoscopy, which is the standard of care for examination of the colon.

The images from the colon capsule will be reviewed and the quality of bowel preparation will be graded using a previously validated scale. It is hypothesized that the Picosalax and prucalopride regime will give a better cleanse for the colon than PEG and prucalopride as there will be less turbid fluid in the colon and allow for a better view of the mucosa. Polyp detection and abnormalities of the mucosa detected with the colon capsule will also be compared to polyps and abnormalities detected at the time of colonoscopy.

 
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Quality of Bowel Preparation for the Colon Capsule
  • Colon Capsule Completion Rates
  • Colon Capsule Polyp Detection
  • Drug: PEG
    PEG 2L at 1800hrs the night before the test and 2L at 0500hrs the morning of the test.
  • Drug: Prucalopride
    Prucalopride 2mg will be administered at 0800hrs on the day of the test, at the same time the colon capsule is administered. Two hours later the position of the colon capsule will be assess with a Realtime Viewer. If the capsule has not reached the cecum a second dose of Prucalopride 2mg will be administered at that time.
  • Drug: Picosalax
    One sachet at 1800hrs the night before the test One sachet at 0500hrs the day of the test
  • Drug: Bisacodyl
    Bisacodyl 10mg in the evening three nights before the procedure and 10mg again two nights before the procedure.
  • Procedure: Colon capsule
    The colon capsule will be ingested at 0800hrs the day of the test. Seven hours will be allowed for the capsule to clear the bowel. The images will be reviewed by two endoscopists with experience reading video capsule endoscopy.
  • Procedure: Colonoscopy
    At 1500hrs on the day of the test all individuals will return to the endoscopy unit for a colonoscopy.
  • Experimental: PEG and Prucalopride
    Interventions:
    • Drug: PEG
    • Drug: Prucalopride
    • Procedure: Colon capsule
    • Procedure: Colonoscopy
  • Experimental: Picosalax and Prucalopride
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Prucalopride
    • Drug: Picosalax
    • Drug: Bisacodyl
    • Procedure: Colon capsule
    • Procedure: Colonoscopy
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
20
June 2013
June 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female patients between the ages of 18 and 75
  • Patients being referred for colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptoms of dysphagia
  • Bowel obstruction or ileus
  • Known stricture or fistula
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Previous small or large bowel surgery
  • Severe gastroparesis or motility disorder
  • Renal impairment (GFR<55 within 3 months of study)
  • Congestive heart failure (NYHA III or IV)
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Cirrhosis or severe hepatic dysfunction (ascites or INR>2)
  • History of serious arrhythmia
  • Pregnancy
Both
18 Years to 75 Years
Yes
Contact: Lawrence Hookey (613) 544-3400 ext 2288 hookeyl@hdh.kari.net
Contact: Darlene Brady 613-544-3400 ext 2445 bradyd@hdh.kari.net
Canada
 
NCT01655095
DMED-1478-12
Yes
Lawrence Hookey, Queen's University
Queen's University
Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit
Principal Investigator: Lawrence Hookey Queens University
Study Director: Darlene Brady Queens University
Queen's University
August 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP