Continuous Versus Interrupted Abdominal Wall Closure After Emergency Midline Laparotomy (CONTINT)
Recruitment status was Recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Patients undergoing primary midline laparotomy for an emergency surgical intervention with a suspected septic focus in the abdominal cavity.
Condition | Intervention | Phase |
---|---|---|
Laparotomy Hernia |
Procedure: Interrupted sutures Procedure: Continuous sutures |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
Official Title: | Continuous Versus Interrupted Abdominal Wall Closure After Emergency Midline Laparotomy: CONTINT - A Randomized Controlled Study |
- Incisional hernia or burst abdomen within 12 months [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Quality of Life [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Estimated Enrollment: | 80 |
Study Start Date: | November 2007 |
Estimated Study Completion Date: | April 2012 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date: | April 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Arms | Assigned Interventions |
---|---|
Active Comparator: A
Interrupted closure with Vicryl equivalent sutures (USP 2, 45 cm)
|
Procedure: Interrupted sutures
Interrupted sutures for abdominal fascia closure with Vicryl equivalent sutures (USP 2, 45 cm)
|
Experimental: B
Continuous closure with PDS II equivalent sutures (USP 1, 150 cm loops)
|
Procedure: Continuous sutures
Continuous sutures for abdominal fascia closure with PDS II equivalent USP 1, 150 cm loops
|
Detailed Description:
More than 700.000 open abdominal surgeries (laparotomies) are performed each year in Germany (2). A major surgical complication after laparotomy is abdominal fascia dehiscence which might appear either as early (burst abdomen with evisceration) or as late complication (incisional hernia). These patients usually undergo surgery for secondary fascial closure associated with markedly increased morbidity (3) including high recurrence rates (up to 45%) (4). The applied surgical strategy of abdominal wall closure (i.e. the combination of suture technique and material) is of high relevance for prevention of fascia dehiscence and, moreover, constitutes the main factor directly controllable by the surgeon. While several randomized controlled trials (RCT) (3; 5-8) as well as meta-analyses (9-12) exist that address the issue of optimal fascia closure in elective laparotomies, there is no RCT dealing exclusively with the emergency setting. As a result abdominal fascia closure is performed according to the surgeon's individual preference rather than according to evidence-based data. Therefore, the present RCT is designed to compare the most established strategies (continuous slowly absorbable sutures and interrupted rapidly absorbable sutures) for abdominal wall closure in order to determine differences between both strategies after midline incisions.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Preoperative Inclusion criteria:
- Age equal or greater than 18 years
- Expected survival time more than 12 months
- Patients undergoing primary and emergency midline laparotomy (patients with prior laparoscopy (not colon resections) or minor abdominal operation (e.g. appendectomy, cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, sectio) may be included into the trial)
- Suspected septic abdominal focus (e.g. perforated stomach ulcer, perforated diverticulitis)
- Informed consent
Intraoperative inclusion criteria before closure:
- Successful source control
- Abdominal lavage
Exclusion Criteria:
Preoperative exclusion criteria:
- Participation in another intervention-trial with interference of intervention and outcome of this study
Intraoperative exclusion criteria before closure:
- Planned re-laparotomy
Contact: Nuh N Rahbari, MD | +49 6221 56 39448 | nuh.rahbari@med.uni-heidelberg.de |
Contact: Sabine - Voß, MD | +49 6221 56 6986 | sabine.voss@med.uni-heidelberg.de |
Germany | |
Department of Surgery | Recruiting |
Heidelberg, Germany, 69120 | |
Contact: Nuh N Rahbari, MD + 49 6221 56 39448 nuh.rahbari@med.uni-heidelberg.de | |
Contact: SDGC Heidelberg +49 6221 56 6986 sdgc@med.uni-heidelberg.de |
Study Director: | Nuh N Rahbari, MD | Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg |
Principal Investigator: | Markus W Büchler, MD | Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg |
No publications provided
Responsible Party: | University of Heidelberg, Germany, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00544583 History of Changes |
Other Study ID Numbers: | S206/2007 |
Study First Received: | October 15, 2007 |
Last Updated: | January 26, 2010 |
Health Authority: | Germany: Ethics Commission |
Keywords provided by University of Heidelberg:
Abdominal wall |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Emergencies Hernia Disease Attributes Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on October 17, 2012