Docket No. 9341
In the Matter of Intel Corporation, a corporation.

File No.: 061 0247

November 2, 2010

August 10, 2010

August 4, 2010

July 21, 2010

June 21, 2010

  • Order Withdrawing Matter From Adjudication For The Purpose Of Considering A Proposed Consent Agreement
  • Joint Motion to Withdraw Matter from Adjudication [Redacted Public Version]

June 11, 2010

June 9, 2010

June 4, 2010

  • Administrative Law Judge’s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-parties Hewlett-Packard Company and David Donatelli for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Ad Testificandum

June 3, 2010

June 2, 2010

June 1, 2010

May 28, 2010

May 27, 2010

  • Motion of Intel Corporation Under Rule 3.36 for Leave to Take a Deposition of the Bureau of Labor Statistics Under Rule 3.33(c)(1)
  • Memorandum in Opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company’s Motion to Quash Intel’s Subpoena Ad Testificandum Issued to Joseph Beyers
  • Memorandum in Opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company’s Motion for Reconsideration and/or Modification of This Court’s May 19, 2010 Order

May 25, 2010

May 20, 2010

  • Complaint Counsel's Second Set of Requests for Admission (24-62)
  • Memorandum in Opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion to Quash Intel's Subpoenas Ad Testificandum Issued to Jeff Groudan, Louis Kim and Joseph Lee (Redacted Public Version)

May 19, 2010

May 17, 2010

May 14, 2010

May 13, 2010

May 11, 2010

  • Administrative Law Judge’s Order Granting Second Unopposed Motion of Non-party Lenovo Group Limited for Extension of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum

May 10, 2010

May 7, 2010

  • Administrative Law Judge’s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party Nvidia Corporation for Extension of Time to File Motion to Quash or Limit Subpoenas Ad Testificandum

May 6, 2010

May 5, 2010

May 4, 2010

  • Administrative Law Judge’s Order Granting Fourth Unopposed Motion of Non-party Hewlett-Packard Company for Extension of Time To Move to Limit or Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum

May 3, 2010

April 30, 2010

April 29, 2010

April 27, 2010

April 26, 2010

April 23, 2010

April 22, 2010

April 21, 2010

April 20, 2010

April 19, 2010

  • Administrative Law Judge’s Order Granting Unopposed Motions of Non-party Hewlett-Packard Company for Extensions of Time to Move to Limit or Quash Subpoenas Duces Tecum

April 16, 2010

April 15, 2010

April 14, 2010

April 12, 2010

  • Memorandum in Opposition to Complaint Counsel's Motion to Admit European Commission Decision

April 8, 2010

April 6, 2010

  • Notice of Appearance filed by Nancy Turnblacer, Nur-ul Haq, Theodore Zang, Jr., and Trang Tran, Counsel Supporting the Complaint

April 1, 2010

March 31, 2010

March 30, 2010

March 29, 2010

March 26, 2010

March 25, 2010

March 24, 2010

March 23, 2010

March 19, 2010

March 18, 2010

March 17, 2010

March 15, 2010

March 12, 2010

March 11, 2010

March 10, 2010

  • First Proposed Modification to the Order Regarding Respondent's Production of Documents and Electronically Stored Information in Response to Complaint Counsel's First Set of Requests for Production - Public

March 9, 2010

  • Administrative Law Judge’s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party Oracle Corporation for Extension of Time to File Motion to Quash or Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum
  • Administrative Law Judge’s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-parties Acer America Corporation and Gateway, Inc. for an Extension of Time to Move to Quash of Limit Subpoenas Duces Tecum

March 5, 2010

  • Notice of Appearance Filed by James L. Hunt, Esq., of Bingham McCutchen LLP, Counsel for the Respondents
  • Notice of Appearance Filed by Roy T. Englert, Jr. of Robbins Russell Englert Orseck Untereiner & Sauber LLP, Counsel for the Respondents
  • Notice of Appearance Filed by Joseph G. Krauss, Counsel for Oracle Corporation - Public

March 4, 2010

  • Administrative Law Judge’s Order Granting Unopposed Motion of Non-party Oracle Corporation for Extension of Time to File Motion to Quash or to Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum

March 3, 2010

  • Notice of Withdrawal of Non-parties Acer, Inc.'s, Acer America Corporation's, and Gateway, Inc.'s Joint Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum or in the Alternative to Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum (Federal Trade Commission Rule 3.34(c), 16 C.F.R. § 3.34©)) - Public
  • Non-parties Acer America Corporation's and Gateway, Inc.’s Joint Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Move to Quash or Limit the Federal Trade Commission's Subpoena Duces Tecum to Non-parties Acer America Corporation and Gateway, Inc. - Public

March 2, 2010

March 1, 2010

February 17, 2010

February 8, 2010

February 2, 2010

  • Administrative Law Judge’s Order Regarding Respondent's Production of Documents and Electronically Stored Information in Response to Complaint Counsel's First Set of Requests for Production

January 29, 2010

January 26, 2010

January 19, 2010

  • Opinion and Order of the Commission Denying Motion For Disqualification [Redacted Public Version]
    Attachment A:  Statement of Commissioner Rosch On Respondent's Motion For Disqualification [Redacted Public Version]

January 14, 2010

January 11, 2010

January 6, 2010

January 5, 2010

  • Notice of Appearance Filed by Robert E. Cooper; Daniel Floyd; Michael L. Denger and Joseph Kattan of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Counsel for the Respondent
  • Notice of Appearance Filed by Darren B. Bernhard, Counsel for the Respondent - Public

December 31, 2009

December 29, 2009

December 16, 2009

December 15, 2009


Last Modified: Thursday, August 11, 2011