Skip To Content
The Dasis Report (Drug and Alcohol Information System)
December 17, 2004

Heroin-Changes In How It Is Used: 1992-2002

In Brief
  • Between 1992 and 2002, inhalation increased as the route of administration from 20 to 33 percent of primary heroin admissions, while injection decreased from 77 to 62 percent
  • Admissions younger than 30 years of age decreased from 45 to 22 percent of primary heroin inhalation admissions, and increased from 21 to 31 percent of primary heroin injection admissions
  • The proportion of heroin inhalation admissions with no prior treatment episodes decreased from 40 to 26 percent, while the proportion with five or more prior treatment episodes increased from 7 to 14 percent

Data on substance abuse treatment admissions from the Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS), 1992 to 2002, provide a way to monitor changes in the way heroin has been used over the past 10 years. As suggested in an earlier report,1 these data support the conclusion that heroin inhalation was a new and growing problem among young adults in the early 1990s.


Heroin Treatment Admissions
Annual admissions for substance abuse treatment in publicly-funded facilities grew from 1.6 million to 1.9 million between 1992 and 2002. During this period, primary2 heroin admissions increased from 11 to 15 percent of all admissions.

Between 1992 and 2002, inhalation and injection accounted for at least 94 percent of annual primary heroin admissions. This report explores trends in primary heroin admissions reporting these two routes of administration during this time period.

Historically, most TEDS admissions treated for primary heroin addiction have injected the drug; in 2002, 62 percent of heroin admissions were injectors (Table 1). However, this estimate reflects a decline from 77 percent in 1992. On the other hand, inhalation of heroin increased; in 2002, 33 percent of heroin admissions inhaled the drug, an increase from 20 percent in 1992.

Table 1. Heroin Admissions, by Route of Administration: 1992-2002
  1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Heroin Admissions
(in Thousands)
168 193 212 221 217 235 247 257 273 278 284
Route of Administration Percent
  Injection   77   73   73   69   70   66   65   65   62   61   62
  Inhalations   20   23   23   27   26   29   30   30   32   33   33
  Smoking     1     2     2     2     2     3     3     3     3     3     2
  Other     2     2     2     2     2     2     2     2     3     3     3
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Source: 2002 SAMHSA Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS).



Demographics
The racial/ethnic composition of heroin injection and inhalation admissions changed between 1992 and 2002. The proportion of Whites increased among both heroin inhalation and injection admissions-from 22 to 28 percent for inhalation, and from 48 to 58 percent for injection admissions (Figure 1). Over the same time period, the percentage of heroin injection admissions who were Black declined from 21 to 14 percent, while that of heroin inhalation admissions who were Black remained roughly the same (46 percent in 1992 and 45 percent in 2002).

Figure 1. Heroin Admissions, by Race/Ethnicity and Route of Administration: 1992 and 2002
Figure 1. Heroin Admissions, by Race/Ethnicity and Route of Administration: 1992 and 2002
Source: 2002 SAMHSA Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS).

While heroin admissions for inhalation increased overall, the share of heroin admissions younger than 30 decreased among inhalation admissions but increased among injection admissions. In 1992, 45 percent of heroin inhalation admissions were younger than 30 years of age, decreasing to 22 percent by 2002 (Figure 2). By contrast, only 21 percent of heroin injection admissions were younger than 30 in 1992, but the proportion increased to 31 percent by 2002.

Figure 2. Heroin Admissions, by Age Group and Route of Administration: 1992 and 2002
Figure 2. Heroin Admissions, by Age Group and Route of Administration: 1992 and 2002
Source: 2002 SAMHSA Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS).



Services
From 1992 to 2002, the proportion of heroin admissions-whether inhaled or injected-receiving ambulatory services dropped, while the proportion receiving detoxification services increased.3 Admissions receiving ambulatory services decreased from 65 percent of primary heroin inhalation admissions in 1992 to 53 percent in 2002, while those receiving detoxification services increased from 24 to 34 percent. Similarly, admissions receiving ambulatory services decreased from 76 percent of primary heroin injection admissions in 1992 to 53 percent in 2002, and those receiving detoxification services increased from 16 to 35 percent.


Prior Treatment
The proportion of heroin injectors entering treatment for the first time was relatively steady from 1992 to 2002, varying between 18 and 20 percent. However, there was a decline in the proportion of inhalers entering treatment for the first time. While 40 percent of heroin inhalation admissions had no prior treatment episodes in 1992, only 26 percent had no prior treatment episodes in 2002. By contrast, admissions with five or more prior admissions rose from 7 percent of heroin inhalation admissions in 1992 to 14 percent in 2002.


Methadone Treatment
The planned use of methadone as part of treatment declined for both heroin injection and inhalation admissions from 1992 to 2002 (Figure 3). While heroin inhalers were consistently less likely than heroin injectors to have methadone included as part of their treatment plan, this difference narrowed in recent years. Nearly two in three heroin injection admissions (65 percent) included planned use of methadone in 1992 compared with about half of heroin inhalation admissions (49 percent). In 2002, however, methadone use was planned for only 39 percent of heroin injectors and 32 percent of heroin inhalers.

Figure 3. Planned Use of Methadone, by Route of Heroin Administration: 1992-2002
Figure 3. Planned Use of Methadone, by Route of Heroin Administration: 1992-2002
Source: 2002 SAMHSA Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS).


End Notes
1 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. The DASIS report: Heroin - changes in how it is used. Rockville, MD. July 20, 2001.
2 The primary substance of abuse is the main substance reported at the time of admission.
3 Service settings are of three types: ambulatory, residential/rehabilitative, and detoxification. Ambulatory settings include intensive outpatient, non-intensive outpatient, and ambulatory detoxification. Residential/rehabilitative settings include hospital (other than detoxification), short-term (30 days or fewer), and long-term (more than 30 days). Detoxification includes 24-hour hospital inpatient and 24-hour free-standing residential.

The Drug and Alcohol Services Information System (DASIS) is an integrated data system maintained by the Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). One component of DASIS is the Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS). TEDS is a compilation of data on the demographic characteristics and substance abuse problems of those admitted for substance abuse treatment. The information comes primarily from facilities that receive some public funding. Information on treatment admissions is routinely collected by State administrative systems and then submitted to SAMHSA in a standard format. TEDS records represent admissions rather than individuals, as a person may be admitted to treatment more than once. State admission data are reported to TEDS by the Single State Agencies (SSAs) for substance abuse treatment. There are significant differences among State data collection systems. Sources of State variation include completeness of reporting, facilities reporting TEDS data, clients included, and treatment resources available. See the annual TEDS reports for details. Approximately 1.9 million records are included in TEDS each year.

The DASIS Report is prepared by the Office of Applied Studies, SAMHSA; Synectics for Management Decisions, Inc., Arlington, Virginia; and by RTI International in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute).

Information and data for this issue are based on data reported to TEDS through March 1, 2004.

Access the latest TEDS reports at:
http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/dasis.htm

Access the latest TEDS public use files at:
http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/SAMHDA.htm

Other substance abuse reports are available at:
http://www.oas.samhsa.gov

The DASIS Report is published periodically by the Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA. Additional copies of this report or other reports from the Office of Applied Studies are available on-line: http://www.oas.samhsa.gov. Citation of the source is appreciated. For questions about this report please e-mail: shortreports@samhsa.hhs.gov

This page was last updated on May 16, 2008 .