Skip Navigation
PrintDownload PDFGet Adobe ReaderDownload to WordDownload as HTMLDownload as XMLCitation Manager
Save to Favorites
Guideline Summary
Guideline Title
Diagnosis and treatment of forefoot disorders. Section 5. Trauma.
Bibliographic Source(s)
Clinical Practice Guideline Forefoot Disorders Panel, Thomas JL, Blitch EL IV, Chaney DM, Dinucci KA, Eickmeier K, Rubin LG, Stapp MD, Vanore JV. Diagnosis and treatment of forefoot disorders. Section 5. Trauma. J Foot Ankle Surg 2009 Mar-Apr;48(2):264-72. [61 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy
Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

Jump ToGuideline ClassificationRelated Content

Scope

Disease/Condition(s)

Trauma in the forefoot

  • Fracture
  • Dislocation
  • Soft tissue injuries
Guideline Category
Diagnosis
Evaluation
Management
Treatment
Clinical Specialty
Emergency Medicine
Family Practice
Orthopedic Surgery
Podiatry
Radiology
Intended Users
Nurses
Physicians
Podiatrists
Guideline Objective(s)

To provide recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of trauma to the forefoot

Target Population

Patients with forefoot trauma

Interventions and Practices Considered

Diagnosis/Evaluation

  1. Comprehensive history and physical examination, including review of symptoms such as pain, disability, swelling, discoloration, loss of joint motion
  2. Radiographic evaluation including anterior-posterior, lateral, and oblique views
  3. Additional diagnostic tests such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), technetium bone scan, computed tomography (CT), or ultrasound, if indicated

Management/Treatment

  1. Management of fracture and dislocation including immobilization, avoiding weightbearing, closed or open reduction techniques, internal fixation
  2. Management of soft tissue injury (e.g., drainage, irrigation and suturing, open repair of the tendon, surgical decompression)
  3. Assurance of updated tetanus prophylaxis
Major Outcomes Considered

Not stated

Methodology

Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
Searches of Electronic Databases
Description of Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence

A search of medical literature was performed using the EndNote, Medline/PubMed, National Library of Medicine, and Science Direct databases from 1950 to 2008. The terms used were trauma foot, fracture foot, metatarsal fracture.

Number of Source Documents

Not stated

Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Not Given)
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence

Not applicable

Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Review
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence

Not stated

Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Expert Consensus
Description of Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations

Not stated

Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations

Not applicable

Cost Analysis

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

Method of Guideline Validation
External Peer Review
Internal Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation

Not stated

Recommendations

Major Recommendations

The recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of trauma are presented in the form of an algorithm with accompanying annotations. An algorithm is provided for Trauma. Annotations follow.

Trauma (Pathway 6)

Trauma in the forefoot can range from simple, nondisplaced fractures to limb-threatening injuries. Proper evaluation and diagnosis is critical to determine the extent of injury and appropriate treatment.

Significant History (Pathway 6, Node 1)

Trauma to the toes, lesser metatarsals, and their respective joints involves various mechanisms and injury type. These include a history of both direct and indirect trauma. Patients may exhibit symptoms acutely at the time of trauma or at a later onset. Symptoms include pain, swelling, discoloration, loss of joint motion, and difficulty standing and/or walking. An accurate history of the inciting traumatic event should be elicited.

Significant Findings (Pathway 6, Node 2)

Clinical examination of the traumatized forefoot may show pain upon palpation and motion of affected joints. The patient may have decreased range of motion, with or without tendon dysfunction. Deformity may or may not be present. The patient may experience pain with or without weightbearing. Soft tissue damage must be evaluated and any neurovascular compromise recognized. Edema is common and often does not allow a shoe to be worn. Ecchymosis and/or erythema may be present, depending on the injury type.

Radiographic Findings (Pathway 5, Node 3)

Radiographs are indicated in most cases of trauma to the forefoot to rule out fracture and/or joint dislocation. Anterior-posterior, lateral, and oblique views may be obtained with the patient in either a weightbearing or nonweightbearing position. In some cases, stress views under anesthesia may be required to identify the injuries.

Positive Diagnosis for Fracture or Dislocation (Pathway 6, Node 4)

Fractures should be evaluated and treated appropriately. Special attention should be directed to restoring articular congruity and segmental alignment, paying particular attention to maintaining alignment in the sagittal plane. Nondisplaced fractures of the forefoot may require only appropriate immobilization (see Figure 1 in the original guideline document), whereas displaced fractures may require closed or open reduction techniques (see Figures 2 and 3 in the original guideline document). Of special note are fractures of the proximal diaphyseal area of the fifth metatarsal (Jones fracture) (see Figure 4 in the original guideline document). Although many fractures of this type may be treated with immobilization and avoidance of weightbearing, internal fixation may be indicated in some patient populations (e.g., high-caliber athletes). Significant intra-articular injury of the interphalangeal or metatarsophalangeal joint may require subsequent arthroplasty.

Dislocations of the interphalangeal joints of the lesser toes probably are somewhat more common than dislocations of the metatarsophalangeal joint. Traumatic dislocations most often occur in the dorsal direction or in the transverse plane. Acute treatment focuses on reduction of the joint dislocation, which usually can be accomplished in a closed fashion (see Figure 5 in the original guideline document). In some cases, soft tissue interposition may require open reduction. Late repair and balancing of capsuloligamentous tissues rarely is necessary.

Diagnosis and treatment of any concomitant soft tissue injury (e.g., soft tissue wound, tendon injury, compartment syndrome) are carried out appropriately. If clinical improvement is not seen within the expected timeframe, further diagnostic imaging such as technetium bone scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), or ultrasound may be indicated to evaluate for non-union or unrecognized osseous or soft tissue injury.

Negative Diagnosis for Fracture or Dislocation (Pathway 6, Node 5)

Trauma to the forefoot is always associated with a degree of soft tissue injury. This may include a variety of soft tissue conditions.

Puncture wounds of the foot are not uncommon and may or may not be associated with a retained foreign body. Appropriate wound care must be performed acutely, along with assurance of updated tetanus prophylaxis. When seen subacutely, puncture wounds may present with signs and symptoms of infection, necessitating more aggressive incision and drainage as well as indicated laboratory testing. Further diagnostic imaging such as MRI and ultrasound may be indicated to identify a suspected retained foreign body not revealed on radiographic studies.

Nail and nail bed injuries range from simple subungual hematoma to open fracture with tissue loss. Approximately one fourth of injuries with subungual hematomas also have fractures of the distal phalanx. Nailbed lacerations frequently are associated with subungual hematomas. Simple nail bed lacerations can be irrigated and sutured with absorbable sutures. A nail bed laceration associated with a fracture of the distal phalanx is technically an open fracture and should be treated accordingly. Degloving injuries involving the nail and distal phalanx can be treated with resection of bone to a proximal level, which allows for adequate soft tissue coverage.

Tendon disruption occurs most commonly with laceration and rarely with closed injury (see Figure 6 in the original guideline document). The majority of cases of extensor hallucis longus (especially proximal to the hood apparatus) and flexor hallucis longus disruption are treated with open repair of the tendon. The literature is less clear regarding the treatment of extensor digitorum longus and flexor digitorum longus disruption.

The attention and care given to the soft tissue envelope is an integral part of the evaluation and management of any forefoot injury. High-energy and crush injuries should raise the level of suspicion for compartment syndrome. Clinical signs include digital weakness or paralysis, gross edema, tense compartments, paresthesias, mottled skin, and unrelieved pain. Compartment pressures of the foot above 30 mm Hg to 35 mm Hg are diagnostic for compartment syndrome. Surgical decompression is indicated if compartment syndrome is suspected from clinical findings and/or compartment pressures.

Lacerations, abrasions, and degloving injuries also may involve the forefoot. Evaluation for associated neurovascular compromise, tendon injury, and other injuries must be performed.

Clinical Algorithm(s)

An algorithm is provided in the original guideline document for trauma.

Evidence Supporting the Recommendations

Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations

The type of supporting evidence is not specifically stated for each recommendation.

This clinical practice guideline is based upon consensus of current clinical practice and review of the clinical literature.

Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations

Potential Benefits

Appropriate evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of forefoot trauma

Potential Harms

Not stated

Implementation of the Guideline

Description of Implementation Strategy

An implementation strategy was not provided.

Implementation Tools
Clinical Algorithm
Foreign Language Translations
Patient Resources
For information about availability, see the Availability of Companion Documents and Patient Resources fields below.

Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Healthcare Quality Report Categories

IOM Care Need
Getting Better
IOM Domain
Effectiveness

Identifying Information and Availability

Bibliographic Source(s)
Clinical Practice Guideline Forefoot Disorders Panel, Thomas JL, Blitch EL IV, Chaney DM, Dinucci KA, Eickmeier K, Rubin LG, Stapp MD, Vanore JV. Diagnosis and treatment of forefoot disorders. Section 5. Trauma. J Foot Ankle Surg 2009 Mar-Apr;48(2):264-72. [61 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy
Adaptation

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

Date Released
2009 Mar-Apr
Guideline Developer(s)
American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons - Medical Specialty Society
Source(s) of Funding

American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons

Guideline Committee

Clinical Practice Guideline Forefoot Disorders Panel

Composition of Group That Authored the Guideline

Clinical Practice Guideline Forefoot Disorders Panel: James L. Thomas, DPM, (Chair), Jacksonville, FL; Edwin L. Blitch, IV, DPM, Charleston, SC; D. Martin Chaney, DPM, San Antonio, TX; Kris A. Dinucci, DPM, Scottsdale, AZ; Kimberly Eickmeier, DPM, Champaign, IL; Laurence G. Rubin, DPM, Mechanicsville, VA; Mickey D. Stapp, DPM, Augusta, GA; and John V. Vanore, DPM, Gadsden, AL

Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest

Not stated

Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

Guideline Availability

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons Web site External Web Site Policy.

Availability of Companion Documents

None available

Patient Resources

The following is available:

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC Status

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on March 12, 2010. The information was verified by the guideline developer on April 14, 2010.

Copyright Statement

Please contact the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS) for permission to reproduce.

Disclaimer

NGC Disclaimer

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

Read full disclaimer...