Market competition has only marginal effect on hospital performance for heart failure
Wide variations exist in the care
and treatment of patients
hospitalized for heart failure. As a
way to improve care quality
outcomes, The Joint Commission
requires hospitals to submit data
on their performance for the
treatment of these patients. This
information is reported publicly,
making market competition a
potential driver for better care.
However, a new study found only a
marginal effect of market
competition on hospital
performance for treating heart
failure.
The researchers obtained heart
failure performance data from The
Joint Commission's Web site
called Quality Check. Quality
indicators used for the study were
published from 2003 to 2006 and
consisted of heart failure drugs
used, left ventricular function
assessment, smoking-cessation
counseling, and hospital discharge
instructions.
Average hospital-level
performance over time improved
significantly on all of the heart
failure quality indicators. Overall,
hospitals in the least competitive
markets performed slightly better
(2.9 percent) than those in the
most competitive markets for left
ventricular function assessment.
Among hospital referral regions,
the least competitive markets
performed about 5.1 percent worse
for smoking-cessation counseling
compared to the most competitive
markets. The researchers suggest
several reasons why market
competition did not have a
stronger influence on the heart
failure quality indicators. First,
hospitals may be engaging more in
competitive pricing and other nonprice
avenues. Second, patients
may not be using The Joint
Commission public data enough to
guide their health care
decisionmaking. Finally, hospitals
across all markets increased their
compliance with the heart failure
indicators over time. The study
was supported in part by the
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality (HS17944).
See "Effect of market competition
on hospital performance for heart
failure," by Jared Lane K. Maeda,
Ph.D., M.P.H., and Anthony T. Lo
Sasso, Ph.D., in the December
2011 American Journal of
Managed Care 17(12), pp. 816-822.
— KB
Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Article