Testimony
Before the Subcommittee
on Technology and Procurement Policy, Committee on Government
Reform
United
States House of Representatives
Bioterrorism
Preparedness:
CDC Efforts to Improve Public Health Information at Federal,
State, and Local Levels
Statement of
Edward
L. Baker, M.D., M.P.H.
Director,
Public Health Practice Program Office Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention
Department
of Health and Human Services
For Release on
Delivery
Expected
at 10:00 am
on
Friday, December 14, 2001
Good morning Mr. Chairman
and Members of the Subcommittee. I am Dr. Edward L. Baker,
Director of the Public Health Practice Program Office
at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
With me today is Dr. Kevin Yeskey, Acting Director of
the Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Program, National
Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC. Thank you for the
invitation to discuss CDC's public health response to
the threat of bioterrorism, specifically our role in building
a strong public health infrastructure to improve public
health information at the local, state, and Federal levels.
As has been highlighted
recently, increased vigilance and preparedness for unexplained
illnesses and injuries are an essential part of the public
health effort to protect our citizens against bioterrorism
and other health threats. The terrorist events on and
since September 11th have been defining moments
for all of us - and they have greatly sharpened the Nation's
focus on public health. Even before the September 11th
attack on the United States, CDC was making substantial
progress to define, develop, and implement nationwide
a set of public health capacities required at all levels-local,
state, and Federal-to prepare for and respond to deliberate
attacks on the health of our citizens. Since September
11th we have worked very closely with our public
health partners to accelerate our efforts, share critical
lessons learned, and identify seven high priority areas
for immediate strengthening. We are committed to increasing
our efforts ever further in the coming months to ensure
that every health department is fully
prepared and every community better protected against
such threats.
Public Health Leadership
The Department of Health
and Human Services' (DHHS) antiterrorism efforts are focused
on five key strategies: (1) improving the nation's public
health surveillance and electronic communications systems
to quickly detect and identify the biological or chemical
agents that have been released; to track and map the spread
of disease; and to report and disseminate information
as rapidly as possible; (2) strengthening the capacities
for medical and public health response at both the state
and local level; (3) expanding the stockpile of pharmaceuticals
for use when needed; (4) regulating the
shipment of hazardous biological agents or toxins; and
(5) expanding research on disease agents that might be
released, including rapid
methods for identifying biological and chemical agents,
and improved treatments and vaccines.
As the nation's disease
prevention and control agency, it is CDC's responsibility,
on behalf of DHHS, to provide national leadership in the
public health and medical communities in a concerted effort
to detect, diagnose, respond to, and prevent illness and
injury, whether occurring naturally or as a result of
a deliberate act. This task is an integral part of CDC's
overall mission to monitor and protect the health of the
U.S. population and has been described in detail in such
reports as CDC's 1998 plan, Preventing Emerging Infectious
Diseases: A Strategy for the 21st Century. This plan,
developed with input from state and local health departments,
disease experts, and partner organizations such as the
American Society for Microbiology, the Association of
Public Health Laboratories, the Council of State and Territorial
Epidemiologists, and the Infectious Disease Society of
America, emphasizes the need to be prepared for the unexpected
- whether it is a naturally occurring influenza pandemic
or the deliberate release of smallpox by a terrorist.
Fundamental to this plan-and
to all preparedness efforts-is a strong national public
health infrastructure. Like our military system, our public
health system must be at a constant state of "battle readiness,"
with a skilled professional workforce, robust information
and communication systems, and a strong network of local,
state, and Federal agencies and laboratories, effectively
linked and working together.
Recognizing the importance
of the nation's public health infrastructure as our first
line of defense, Congress requested in FY2000 that CDC
assess the current state of the infrastructure and make
recommendations on possible actions that could be taken
to strengthen key components. In response, in March 2001,
CDC released the report Public Health's Infrastructure:
A Status Report, developed in collaboration with
national and international public health associations
and officials at the local, state, and Federal levels.
This report outlined 10 key recommendations for improving
the public health infrastructure, building on the goals
previously identified in Healthy People 2010.
As the Committee requested, I will describe CDC's approach
and strategies for achieving these goals with our public
health partners, with a special emphasis on improved information
and communication systems.
One of the anchors of our
defense against bioterrorism continues to be accurate
information regarding how to recognize a potential threat
and knowledge of appropriate actions. CDC serves as a
trusted source of scientific information on emerging infectious
diseases and other public health threats and works with
our private and public partners to communicate disease
prevention information to state and local health departments,
health professionals, and the public. Since September
11th, CDC has issued more than 175 updates
on the response to the terrorist attacks and the anthrax
investigations through a variety of communication channels,
reaching an estimated 7 million health professionals and
the public.
This level of communication
and collaboration with our public health partners has
been crucial to the investigation and response to these
events, but improvements can still be made to the nation's
information and communication systems, as called for in
the Infrastructure Report. To maximize the effectiveness
of the public health response, key communications recommendations
must include:
1) All health departments
should have continuous, high-speed access to
the Internet and standard protocols for data exchange.
Integral to this recommendation is the ability to detect
cases and track and map disease occurrence in order to
manage the public health response to an outbreak;
2) All health departments
should have immediate, online access to current health
information, such as public health interventions and treatment
guidelines;
3) All health departments
should have the capacity to send and receive sensitive
health information via secure electronic systems and to
broadcast emergency health alerts among hospitals, medical
centers, and other community partners.
These recommendations are
being achieved by a State and Federal partnership through
three major initiatives, which form the core of a comprehensive,
nationwide health information system. These three initiatives
are the Health Alert Network (HAN), the National Electronic
Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS), and the Epidemic
Information Exchange, or Epi-X. As the events
of September 11th highlighted so dramatically,
these three initiatives are critical to our nation's emergency
response now-and for the future-and must be fully implemented
as quickly as possible by States with Federal assistance.
They must be fully implemented as quickly as possible,
in a seamlessly integrated system that supports rapid
and effective public health action. I will describe each
briefly.
Health Alert Network
The Health Alert Network,
or HAN, is designed to be the nation's rapid online system
for health communication, information, and training. When
fully deployed, the Health Alert Network will link local,
state, and Federal agencies with their community partners,
private health care providers, and others, and will serve
as the electronic platform for NEDSS, Epi-X, and other
applications. The Health Alert Network is being developed
in three Phases, incorporating the three key recommendations
of the Infrastructure Report. The three phases
are:
Phase I:
Ensure that each
county health department has 1) continuous, high-speed
Internet access, 2) the capacity to receive emergency
broadcast health alert messages, and 3) online access
to Satellite and Web-Based distance-learning programs
for just-in-time training and health updates.
Phase II:
Extend HAN to the full range of community partners; enhance
information security and redundancy at each node in the
network; ensure 24/7 operation and reach through expanded
HAN Operations Centers at state and large city headquarters;
and deploy mobile phones, pagers, and new communications
devices to state and local health officials.
Phase III:
Provide time-saving and innovative information tools and
resources for public health practice in the field, including
model emergency plans and protocols; pictures, maps, and
diagnostic reference images; health communication and
media materials; and lessons learned from peer communities.
Many of these resources are under development in three
City-County Health Departments-Dekalb County, GA, Rochester/Monroe
County, NY, and Denver City/County, CO-which serve as
HAN Exemplar Sites and laboratories of innovation.
On the morning of September
11th, the Health Alert Network was fully activated
for only the second time since its inception. Within four
hours after the attack on the World Trade Center the Health
Alert Network was in put into full operation at one of
CDC's offsite facilities and began transmitting health
messages to the top 250 public health officials in the
50 states, Guam, and 7 large cities. Over the course of
the ensuing 12 weeks, some 60 health alerts, advisories,
and updates have been transmitted directly from CDC, and
the Network has been extended to potentially reach an
estimated 1 million recipients in the first wave, including
1,500 local and county
health officers and a wide range of frontline public and
private practice physicians, nurses, laboratorians, environmental
specialists, health communicators, and other professionals.
In addition to this first
"tier" of communication transmitted directly from CDC,
states with CDC funding and guidance have established
their own statewide Health Alert Networks for retransmitting
and augmenting CDC information. Through August 2001, 40
states and cities had received Health Alert Network awards.
In September the remaining states, the District of Columbia,
and Guam received small planning grants to get started.
To date:
- Thirteen states have
directly connected 100% of their counties (924) to the
Health Alert Network via high-speed continuous Internet
access; the remaining 37 states have reached an additional
1,217 counties, for a total of 2,142 counties, or two-thirds
(68.1% ) of all U.S. counties.
- Forty-two states are
extending the Health Alert Network to reach private
providers; these currently include approximately 2500
hospitals and 6,000 physician offices.
- All 50 states are developing
full-function distance-learning systems for access to
CDC training courses and broadcasts; since September
11th, CDC has reached 1.1 million public
and private health professionals through a series of
12 Satellite and Web Broadcasts.
- All 50 states are developing
Health Alert Network Web Sites; many of these are fully
operational and have been used since September 11th
to communicate with health professionals, the media,
and the public, and to link directly to CDC's Web Site
for Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response.
The Epidemic Information
Exchange (Epi-X)
The
Epidemic Information Exchange (Epi-X), is CDC's secure
web-based communications system that provides intelligence
sharing capabilities for CDC, state and local health officials,
and select military health personnel regarding newly identified
disease outbreaks and health events, particularly those
suggestive of bioterrorism. Epi-X
is intended to provide secure, moderated communication
to help public health officials prepare for, and respond
to, epidemics and other emerging health events, including
bioterrorism. Epi-X serves as an important portal for
private, electronic exchange of epidemiologic information,
including early notification of suspected cases of disease,
online discussions of presumptive diagnoses and laboratory
reports, and rapid requests for onsite epidemic
assistance. Epi-X also facilitates the rapid submission,
review, and publication of timely updates for CDC's premier
weekly health bulletin, the Morbidity and Mortality
Weekly Report (MMWR), which provides definitive and
citable articles for the scientific literature.
In response to the attacks
on September 11th, Epi-X immediately provided
secure communications among state and large city epidemiologists
and CDC programs, including the Epidemic Intelligence
Service. Since the identification of the first anthrax
case in Florida, CDC and state and local health authorities
have posted over 80 Epi-X reports on bioterrorism-related
threats, investigations, and responses. Epi-X has also
been used to notify health authorities by telephone and/or
pager about urgent information on the anthrax investigations
and to initiate telephone and on-line conferences to coordinate
the ongoing public health response. In operation since
December 2000, medical personnel review all content before
distribution on Epi-X and they monitor the site on a 24/7
basis. Currently, 731 health officials at the local, state
and Federal level have access to Epi-X. To improve intelligence
gathering and sharing across agencies, CDC plans to gather
information from additional sources such as international
health agencies, and to include additional Federal agencies,
military installations and local public health and safety
authorities in Epi-X. CDC
will also assist other organizations in using standard
reporting tools, developing editorial policies, and training
users in online features.
These expansions will further enable state and local health
departments to identify and report public health threats,
including those suggestive of bioterrorism. Epi-X
represents an important, specialized application built
upon the platform of the Health Alert Network.
National Electronic
Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS)
Public health surveillance
is a crucial monitoring function for CDC and its partners.
It is these ongoing data collection activities that help
us detect threats to the health of the public. Without
our public health surveillance systems, we might not identify
outbreaks or other important problems in time to prevent
the further spread of disease. We cannot investigate problems,
identify their causes, and implement control measures
if we have not detected them. Surveillance systems also
let local health departments map the location of cases,
track whether cases are increasing or decreasing over
time, and link laboratory data with case reports, to either
confirm them as cases, or provide prompt reassurance if
tests are negative. These surveillance data are critical
to target resources appropriately for public health response.
Recent events have underscored this essential role of
public health surveillance.
The traditional operation
of our surveillance systems generally consists of paper
or facsimile reporting by providers to health departments.
If a case of illness is particularly unusual or severe
(such as a case of anthrax or rabies), the provider will
call the local health department immediately. CDC and
its partners have recognized the need to build more timely,
comprehensive surveillance information systems that are
less burdensome to data providers. Several years ago,
we initiated the development of the National Electronic
Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS). The ultimate goal
of NEDSS is the electronic, real-time reporting of information
for public health action. NEDSS includes direct electronic
linkages with the health care system; for example, medical
information about important diagnostic tests can be shared
electronically with public health officials as soon as
a clinical laboratory receives a specimen, or makes a
diagnosis.
NEDSS is designed to facilitate
the development of an integrated, coherent, national system
for public health surveillance that will have the flexibility
and capacity to support emergency response, as well as
handle ongoing public health surveillance needs. NEDSS
standards provide an "architecture" which can support
a wide range of surveillance activities. Ultimately, NEDSS
will support the automated collection, transmission, and
monitoring of disease data from multiple sources (clinicians'
offices, laboratories, etc.) to local and state health
departments and to the CDC. NEDSS will replace current
systems used by public health agencies for collecting
disease surveillance data, which rely on multiple, disparate,
independently designed and supported systems. All 50 states,
6 cities and 1 territory have received funding for NEDSS;
21 jurisdictions have received funds for assessment and
planning. Thirty-six state and metropolitan health jurisdictions
are receiving funds for NEDSS compatible systems development,
including 20 jurisdictions receiving support to deploy
in 2002 the NEDSS Base System, a NEDSS-compatible system
developed for state use.
State
and Local Efforts
CDC has
been working to ensure that all levels of the public health
community - local, state, and Federal - are prepared to
work in coordination with the medical and emergency response
communities to address the public health consequences
of biological and chemical terrorism.
State and local health
departments are able to respond in part because of CDC's
support of their bioterrorism preparedness. We have seen
the results of these investments in the rapid public health
responses to anthrax in Florida, New York, New Jersey,
Washington, DC, and Connecticut. CDC has made awards to
all states and three large cities--plus Washington, DC
and Guam--which are now better prepared not only to identify
and respond to bioterrorist acts, but also to provide
enhanced communications with Federal, state, and local
public health agencies.
CDC will continue and expand
support to states, as well as enhance CDC's own preparedness
for future attacks.
Public Health Infrastructure
Development
In addition to these efforts,
CDC has also worked with ASTHO, NACCHO, and other public
health partners to implement the new law enacted last
November, the Public Health Threats and Emergencies
Act of 2000. This landmark legislation calls for
three important milestones to strengthen the nation's
public health infrastructure:
- Development of a set
of consensus public health infrastructure capacities
required for national, state, and local public health
systems and their workforces;
- Assessment of the current
state of the nation's public health systems using these
capacities to identify critical gaps in the infrastructure;
and
- Technical assistance
and funding to state and local health agencies to fill
those gaps, beginning with the highest priority areas.
To date, CDC, HRSA, ASTHO,
NACCHO, and state and local public health officials have
jointly developed the set of public health infrastructure
capacities and have identified seven priority areas for
immediate strengthening. These seven areas build on the
findings and recommendations of the Infrastructure
Report:
- System Readiness:
Public health systems with the ability and surge capacity
to effectively respond to public health threats and
emergencies.
- Information
Systems: Secure, accessible information systems
for rapid communication, acquisition, analysis and interpretation
of health data, and public access to health information.
- Communication:
Swift, secure, two-way communication mechanisms to distribute
scientific and health information to communities and
policymakers; provide timely, accurate public information
and advice to policymakers during emergency events;
and coordinate logistical communication within the response
community.
- Epidemiology
and Surveillance: Public health systems with
the capacity to monitor health events, to identify patterns
or aberrations, to track and respond to outbreaks, and
to investigate underlying causes.
- Laboratory:
Public health laboratories with the ability to produce
timely and accurate laboratory results for diagnostic
and investigative purposes.
- Workforce:
A public health workforce capable of delivering the
Essential Public Health Services during routine and
emergency operation.
- Policy, Laws,
& Evaluation: Utilization of community
assessment findings to establish priorities, ensure
proper legal authorities, and improve the effectiveness
of programs and policy decisions.
The President's budget for FY2002 recommended funding
to get this important work started. The Administration's
emergency request after September 11th included
funding to make further progress on these and other priorities.
Lessons Learned
The events of this fall
are unprecedented. Like every organization and every individual,
CDC has learned many lessons. As we work through the current
anthrax threats and prepare for the next challenge, whatever
it may be, we take forward a deeper understanding of bioterrorism
and of how we share information.
We learned that the linkages
we have helped forge between clinical and public health
communities are strong and that these linkages saved lives
by detecting illness early. We learned how to shorten
the time lag between acquiring new knowledge, communication
and action. We confirmed that close collaboration of local,
state, and Federal public health personnel builds confidence
in local response. We are newly aware of the challenge
that changing science presents to clear communication.
As we learned about the health risks of this outbreak,
we had to modify recommendations, refocus investigations,
and change our message. We put new scientific information
into action with great speed. We also learned more about
what information is valuable to the public and our partners,
which will help us craft messages and materials in the
future.
Conclusion
In conclusion,
CDC is committed to working with other Federal agencies
and partners as well as state and local public health
departments to ensure the health and medical care of our
citizens. We have made substantial progress to date in
enhancing the nation's capability to prepare for and respond
to a bioterrorist event, but there is much more to be
done. The best public health strategy to protect the health
of civilians against biological terrorism is the development,
organization, and enhancement of public health prevention
systems and tools, including enhanced communications mechanisms
and messages. Other priorities include strengthened public
health laboratory capacity, increased surveillance and
outbreak investigation capacity, and education and training
at the local, state, and Federal levels. Not only will
this approach ensure that we are better prepared for deliberate
bioterrorist threats, but it will also enable us to recognize
and control naturally occurring new or re-emerging infectious
diseases. A strong and flexible public health infrastructure
is the best defense against any disease outbreak.
Thank you very much for
your attention. I will be happy to answer any questions
you may have.
HHS Home (www.hhs.gov) |
Topics (www.hhs.gov/SiteMap.html) |
What's New (www.hhs.gov/about/index.html#topiclist) |
For Kids (www.hhs.gov/kids/) |
FAQs (answers.hhs.gov) |
Site Info (www.hhs.gov/SiteMap.html) |
Disclaimers (www.hhs.gov/Disclaimer.html) |
Privacy Notice (www.hhs.gov/Privacy.html) |
FOIA (www.hhs.gov/foia/) |
Accessibility (www.hhs.gov/Accessibility.html) |
Contact Us (www.hhs.gov/ContactUs.html)
Last
revised: December 14, 2001