Plain Language: Improving Communications from the Federal Government to the Public


Powered by Google

 
Home
PL Law
PL Guidelines
Examples
Examples DB
Tips & Tools
Popular Topics
Resources
PL Websites
PL Legacy
What is Plain Language?> Government Mandates> Walters v. Reno

Walters v. Reno


Maria Walters and others v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service.
No. 96-36304. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9846, May 18, 1998.

In this case, the court found that certain government forms were so difficult to read that they violated due process requirements that people be given "notice" of possible legal actions against them, and of the legal consequences of their own actions. In brief, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that aliens subject to deportation based on INS charges that they committed document fraud did not get due process. The forms used by INS to tell the plaintiffs that they might be deported did not "simply and plainly communicate" legal consequences to the plaintiffs. The court ordered INS to redo the forms to communicate better. The court also ordered INS to refrain from deporting any alien whose case had been processed using the deficient forms.

The complete text of the decision.
 
Related Topics:
What is Plain Language

History of Plain Language

Definitions of Plain Language

Government Mandates

 
Home|About Us|Contact Us|Privacy and Other Policies|USA.gov|HowTo.gov|Usability.gov
 
Technical support for this website is provided by the Federal Aviation Administration
PLAIN develops and maintains the content of this site

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader.external link