U.S. Department of Justice

Research and Information Services

The Research and Information Services Division serves NIC with both an internal and external focus. The Division supports the Institute by assisting with the development and execution of evaluation protocols for training and other assistance strategies, advising on the development of evaluation components for various programs and initiatives, coordinating special projects with research or evaluation components, and tracking and distributing information about recent research or emerging trends. A primary focus of this work is to develop products that can be translated and transmitted to the field in a format useful for correctional operations.

The Division also houses the Institute’s technology and information management functions. This includes, but is not limited to, managing and monitoring the NIC Information Center and publications contracts. In addition to managing hardware and software applications, the assigned staff participates in agency-wide initiatives and projects to ensure the best use and applications of current and emerging technologies.

In terms of services to the field, the Research and Information Services Division sponsors the following:

  • The Institutional Corrections Research Network (ICRN) and funds approved research or evaluation related technical assistance requests.
  • Achieving Performance Excellence (APEX);
  • Cost Containment;
  • Green Corrections;
  • Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA);
  • The Norval Morris Project.

Share Page

Recommended Reading

Date Title Type
2007
Document preview
National Institute of Corrections Training Academy Evaluation Project, 2005-2006: Participant Demographics, Overall Evaluation of Training, and Applicability Ratings
By Wells, James B.; Minor, Kevin I.; Wallace, Lisa H.; Parson, J. Stephen. National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC). Eastern Kentucky University. Center for Criminal Justice Education and Research (Richmond, KY).
Initial results from the Training Academy Evaluation Project (TAEP) assessing the training offered by the National Institute of Corrections' Academy are presented. Sections of this bulletin are: highlights; research strategy; findings regarding participant demographic and background profile, participants' overall evaluation of training, participants' evaluations of training applicability, and pre/post comparison of perceived applicability; and future directions. Overall, participants rate the t... Read More
PDF
12 p.
2007
Document preview
National Institute of Corrections Training Academy Evaluation Project, 2005-2006: Participant Evaluation of Trainers
By Wells, James B.; Minor, Kevin I.; Parson, J. Stephen. National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC). Eastern Kentucky University. Center for Criminal Justice Education and Research (Richmond, KY).
Results from the Training Academy Evaluation Project (TAEP) assessing the training offered by the National Institute of Corrections' Academy are presented. This bulletin discusses how participants felt about individual trainers. Some highlights include: twenty-eight of the 34 trainers received high marks for satisfaction while also receiving an average score of 98% for them to lead classes again. The trainer strength most noted was knowledge of the field (27%), with the trainer weakness most oft... Read More
PDF
12 p.
2008
Document preview
National Institute of Corrections Training Evaluation Project, 2005-2007: Training Results, Activity Level Changes, and Implementation Results
By Wells, James B.; Minor, Kevin I.; Parson, J. Stephen. National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC). Commonwealth Research Consulting, Inc. (Brookline, MA).
Results from the Training Evaluation Project assessing the training offered by the National Institute of Corrections are presented. This bulletin covers “training results (progress on training objectives), activity level changes (pre- and post-training behavior), and implementation results (in the workplace)” (p.1). Participants made moderate to substantial progress in meeting training objectives, engaged in 70.4% of key training-related behaviors, and made moderate progress implementing trainin... Read More
PDF
14 pages
2008
Document preview
National Institute of Corrections Training Evaluation Project: 2008 Evaluation Results: Satisfaction, Learning, and Action Plan Progress
By Wells, James B.; Minor, Kevin I.; Parson, J. Stephen. National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC). Commonwealth Research Consulting, Inc. (Brookline, MA).
Results from the Training Evaluation Project assessing the training offered by the National Institute of Corrections are presented. Evaluations are made of more recent trainings instead of those conducted during the pilot phase of this project. The programs are Inmate Behavior Management, Administering a Small Jail, Conducting Prison Security Audits, and How to Run a Direct Supervision Housing Unit—Training for Trainers. On a 5 point scale, participants rated satisfaction with training and train... Read More
PDF
22 pages
[+] feedback