Glossary, CRG, NHLBI, NIH

Reviewer's enthusiasm for your application will be reflected in an overall impact/priority score, and scores for each review criterion. Criterion. scores range from "1" (exceptionally strong with essentially no weaknesses) to "9" (serious and substantive weaknesses with very few strengths), reflecting scientific and technical merit. The five scored criteria for research grant

Grant
financial assistance mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity. A grant is used whenever the NIH

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
the United State's medical research agency, a federal government agency composed of diverse Institutes and Centers that conduct and support biomedical and behavioral research. NIH Homepage.

Institute or Center anticipates no substantial programmatic involvement with the recipient during performance of the financially assisted activities.

applications are Significance, Investigator(s), Innovation, Approach, and Environment and more detail can be found in "Review Criteria at a Glance".

The overall impact/priority score will range from "10" to "90", and is calculated from the mean of the overall scores voted by all eligible panel members (not just the assigned reviewers), multiplied by a factor of 10. The overall score is not the mean of the criterion scores, but is a separate score reflecting the varying weight the reviewer applied to the individual criteria. The impact score is not the same as the "old" priority score. Impact score indicates the importance or impact the study will have on the field. Applications unanimously judged by the peer review committee to be less competitive are not discussed at the meeting and will not receive an overall impact score.

Within a few days after the meeting your Priority score and Percentile

Percentile
represents the relative position or rank of each priority score (along 100.0 percentile band) among the scores assigned by a particular study section.

ranking are available to you online via the NIH Commons. Within a month, the scientific review administrator( SRA

Scientific Review Administrator (SRA)
presides over a scientific review group, and coordinates and reports the initial peer review of each grant application assigned to it. They are intermediaries between applicants and reviewers, and prepare summary statements for all applications reviewed.

) will prepare the Summary Statement

Summary Statement
official document with a short synopsis of peer reviewer critiques scores, codes indicating various concerns (e.g., human subjects research), and a recommended budget.

which will be available via your NIH Commons account. Whether or not your application was discussed, you will receive the reviewer critiques and preliminary scores for each review criterion. Go to the Commons website for information on how a username and password can be obtained.

Based on priority score, competitive applications for some mechanisms receive a Percentile rank, indicating its rank relative to others reviewed by its review group at the current and past two review meetings. At NHLBI, an application's percentile rank is the basis for funding decisions of R01

R01
grant mechanism used by NIH to provide support for health-related research which can be investigator-initiated or in response to a program announcement or request for application.

and R21 awards. However, SBIR, STTR. K awards and other awards receive only a priority score.

Page Last Updated: February 2011
Content Manager: ClinicalResearchPolicyManager@nhlbi.nih.gov

Skip to content past banner and navigation links U.S. Department of Health & Human Services National Institutes of Health Contact Us Get Email Alerts Font Size Accessible Search Form Advanced Search Search the NHLBI, use radio buttons below to select whole site or Disease and Conditions Index only NHLBI Entire Site NHLBI Entire Site1 Diseases & Conditions2
Home » Clinical Research Guide » Review » Did the reviewers like my application?
CRG Home Contracts Overview What is clinical research? What is the role of NIH and NHLBI in clinical research? What are the Project Officer's responsibilities in clinical research? What is the role of the Principal Investigator/Institution in clinical research? Application How can I find funding opportunities (RFAs, RFPs and PAsG)? What do I need to know before submitting a clinical research application? Am I a new investigator and what if this is my first NIH application? Which NHLBI staff can help me? Is my study considered clinical research? Is my study observational or interventional? What is the best award mechanism for my clinical research proposal? What if my project exceeds $500,000 in direct costs in any given year? Where can I get help with writing the application? What must I include in "Protection of Human Subjects"? How and when do I submit my application? Review What happens to my grant after submission? Who will review my application and when? Did the reviewers like my application? What is a summary statement and what does it mean? What if I don't agree with the review? Funding How do I know if I am funded? Who needs human subjects protection training? Who approves my data monitoring plan? What is a Certificate of Confidentiality and do I need one? How do I develop consent forms and who reviews them? Are there ethical concerns and conflicts of interest I must consider? Do I need IRB, IEC or REB approval? What other approvals are needed? How do I track recruitment of research participants? My study involves Medicare or third party support. My study involves foreign grants and contracts. How do I register my study? When can I begin enrolling participants? Management How do I comply with Good Clinical Practices (GCP)? How do I manage changes to my grant? How do I report amendments, suspensions and terminations? Must I obtain continuing review from the IRB? Who should monitor subject recruitment/retention? How do I report adverse events? How is data quality monitored? What if I wish to add extra sites or studies to my project? How do I manage my budget and when are reports expected? What is HIPAA and how do I abide by the requirements ? Study Closure Tools & Training Glossary	Did the reviewers like my application? Reviewer's enthusiasm for your application will be reflected in an overall impact/priority score, and scores for each review criterion. Criterion. scores range from "1" (exceptionally strong with essentially no weaknesses) to "9" (serious and substantive weaknesses with very few strengths), reflecting scientific and technical merit. The five scored criteria for research grant Grant financial assistance mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity. A grant is used whenever the NIH National Institutes of Health (NIH) the United State's medical research agency, a federal government agency composed of diverse Institutes and Centers that conduct and support biomedical and behavioral research. NIH Homepage. Institute or Center anticipates no substantial programmatic involvement with the recipient during performance of the financially assisted activities. applications are Significance, Investigator(s), Innovation, Approach, and Environment and more detail can be found in "Review Criteria at a Glance". The overall impact/priority score will range from "10" to "90", and is calculated from the mean of the overall scores voted by all eligible panel members (not just the assigned reviewers), multiplied by a factor of 10. The overall score is not the mean of the criterion scores, but is a separate score reflecting the varying weight the reviewer applied to the individual criteria. The impact score is not the same as the "old" priority score. Impact score indicates the importance or impact the study will have on the field. Applications unanimously judged by the peer review committee to be less competitive are not discussed at the meeting and will not receive an overall impact score. Within a few days after the meeting your Priority score and Percentile Percentile represents the relative position or rank of each priority score (along 100.0 percentile band) among the scores assigned by a particular study section. ranking are available to you online via the NIH Commons. Within a month, the scientific review administrator( SRA Scientific Review Administrator (SRA) presides over a scientific review group, and coordinates and reports the initial peer review of each grant application assigned to it. They are intermediaries between applicants and reviewers, and prepare summary statements for all applications reviewed. ) will prepare the Summary Statement Summary Statement official document with a short synopsis of peer reviewer critiques scores, codes indicating various concerns (e.g., human subjects research), and a recommended budget. which will be available via your NIH Commons account. Whether or not your application was discussed, you will receive the reviewer critiques and preliminary scores for each review criterion. Go to the Commons website for information on how a username and password can be obtained. Based on priority score, competitive applications for some mechanisms receive a Percentile rank, indicating its rank relative to others reviewed by its review group at the current and past two review meetings. At NHLBI, an application's percentile rank is the basis for funding decisions of R01 R01 grant mechanism used by NIH to provide support for health-related research which can be investigator-initiated or in response to a program announcement or request for application. and R21 awards. However, SBIR, STTR. K awards and other awards receive only a priority score. Page Last Updated: February 2011 Content Manager: ClinicalResearchPolicyManager@nhlbi.nih.gov
Twitter Facebook YouTube SEARCH \| ACCESSIBILITY \| READERS & PLAYERS \| SITE INDEX \| OTHER SITES \| PRIVACY STATEMENT \| FOIA \| CONTACT US \| OIG National Institutes of Health Department of Health and Human Services USA.gov

Did the reviewers like my application?