Blog

Kindle Paperwhite Review: Brighter, Better, Fatter

I used to read a lot, but as I aged and gained responsibilities, books became less central to my life. When I moved to a new city with a poor local library that was just a little too far out of the way my habit of reading died a silent death – and it took more than a year before I even realized.

Then, one day, it hit me: ‘I’ve forgotten about reading. I need to fix this’. My local library wasn’t going to move any closer to my apartment, so I looked into getting a Kindle and settled on the non-touch, D-pad version. Access to books was no longer a problem, and my reading went up.

But not by a lot.

Why? I loved my new Kindle and, reading my first book on it, The Diamond Age was a joy. But my optimal reading time is just before bed and, though the D-pad Kindle’s screen was great, it’s low contrast made night-time reading, even with an Anglerfish-style book light, difficult.

So when Amazon announced the Kindle Paperwhite, I ordered one immediately with the hope that it might replace my current Kindle and the improved, glowing screen would increase the amount I read.

First Impressions: Fatter, Brighter, Better

My first thought on lifting the Paperwhite was: ‘This feels like a brick’. Of course, it’s nowhere near that heavy, but I was accustomed to the weightless feeling D-pad Kindle.

The D-pad Kindle weighs 5.98 ounces (170g) while the Paperwhite is 7.5 ounces (213g). It’s only 25% heavier but that’s enough to make the Paperwhite just a bit too heavy to comfortably use one-handed.

The back of the Paperwhite feels like it’s covered with hard rubber. This might make the Paperwhite more resistant to drops, but it feels cheap – as though it’s been engineered with careless children in mind.

But, the initial tactile impression aside, turning on the Paperwhite revealed why I bought it in the first place: the screen.

E-ink screens are nothing like computer screens. My D-pad Kindle has been the most enjoyable reading experience since my trusty old Palm III. But, the reason these screens are so great is because they’re not backlit.

Reading on a computer or iPad is like looking into a flashlight upon which paper cutout words have been placed. Sort of like the bat signal: it’s readable, but not ideal.

This really hurts my eyes.

This really hurts my eyes.

The absence of light was the key selling feature on the previous Kindles, so I was dubious about adding a light, in spite of Jeff Bezos’s nanoimprinted promises.

But, I was wrong to doubt. The paperwhite has achieved what I thought impossible: an illuminated screen that doesn’t blast light in you eyes. The effect is as though there’s a magic lamp in the room that only shines evenly across the Paperwhite’s screen.

In comparison the D-pad Kindle’s screen looks hopelessly low contrast with its dark gray text on light green-gray background.

The Paperwhite’s screen with it’s illumination is much higher contrast. Though I never thought I would, I leave the light on all the time. I didn’t realize how constrained by room lighting I was before when I wanted to read – always needing to align myself with a source of lighting before getting started. Now, there is no awkward couch position or room illumination that isn’t perfect for reading.

Unfortunately, the screen has a darker area near the top-center that is a little irritating. I’ve exchanged my Paperwhite not once, not twice but thrice (Amazon’s customer service is great) trying to get a perfect screen but they all have some slight amount of blueish, brownish distortion.

The only reason this bothers me is because the rest of the screen looks so good. Even with the slightly dark patch, I’ve never read a page of text this well illuminated. It’s just beautiful – now if only Amazon can just get the lighting even across the whole screen, it will be perfect.

There is also some irregular light at the bottom of the screen, where the LEDs are, that I’ve heard people complain about but, it doesn’t bother me as the shadows (mostly) don’t reach the text.

Typographically Dubious

The Kindle Paperwhite comes with six typeface choices: Baskerville, Caecilia, Caceilia Condensed, Futura, Helvetica and Palatino. There was a big fuss at the product announcement over how the typefaces were lovingly handcrafted to be pixel perfect on the new screen – and perhaps they were – but Amazon should have picked better typefaces to pamper.

Helvetica is the IBM of typefaces: boring, but no one ever got fired for using it. Futura, the other sans-serif, is great for the Internet but hideous for reading long-form text.

Baskerville is a fine, honest typeface but not the best choice for the Paperwhite. While the increased resolution of the Paperwhite is an improvement over the previous generations, it’s still not quite good enough to render a thin typeface like Baskerville at a small size. A full page of Baskerville looks a bit uneven with some of the letter forms lighter than others – almost like a photocopy.

This leaves just two typefaces: Palatino, a thin serif which suffers from the same problems as Baskerville, and Caecilia which, by means of attrition, is the only reasonable choice. 

The sizes, margin and line spacing options are fine, though could perhaps do with a bit more granularity – I’m never quite settled between text size four (a bit too small) and size five (a bit too large).

There is one further mistake that is completely unforgivable: Kindle’s full justified text is an abomination in the eyes of the typographic gods.

Seriously, full justified text is only used by students trying to puff up the look of their papers and by those who don’t know any better.

It’s terrible is because full justified text makes the spaces between words uneven which is a more uncomfortable reading experience. I understand that doing proper text hyphenation, giving you both a straight right side to paragraphs and even spacing between the letters is difficult, but is it too much to ask for from the largest ebook retailer in the world? I think not.

Terrible, uneven spacing.

Terrible, uneven spacing.

Barring text hyphenation, I beg of thee, Jeff Bezos please give Kindles the option to left-justify text. All I want is even spacing between my words.

Better than a Book or an iPad

This review may thus-far seem like mostly complaints, but don’t get me wrong: my Kindle Paperwhite is better than a book or an iPad.

The worst thing about reading on my iPad is that I’m reading on my iPad. Email and Twitter are just a double-home-button press away. As the Internet has become more the center of my life it’s increasingly difficult not to check in on it. One of the Kindle’s biggest advantages is its inability to get on the Internet in a remotely usable way.

“So what,” you say. “Books haven’t been able to get on the Internet since 1440”. True, but books from the library are disgusting objects filled with germs and stains of uncontemplatable origins. Newly bought store books are better (minus the expense) but still heavy, awkward to hold at the beginning and the end, and are completely unsearchable. Which brings us to the next section:

Touchscreen: The Highlight of a Workflow

The vast majority of books I read are non-fiction and many of these are read not for pleasure but as research for my videos. As such, being able to highlight books and reference those highlights later is a must.

Though I’m heavily invested in Apple’s ecosystem, I don’t use iBooks because of their limited highlights. While iBooks does allow you to highlight text it’s nearly impossible to get those highlights out in a useful way, to say nothing of simply trying to look at them on a laptop.

Amazon, however, is nothing if not omnipresent and has Kindle readers for the iPhone, iPad and most importantly, desktop computers. When I’m working on a video I can easily pull up a related book on my Laptop and see the highlights I’ve made.

I can even go to the Kindle website and copy the highlights into Evernote. Awesome.

The Paperwhite’s touch screen is good enough that it makes typing out notes attached to highlights a possibility – something I wouldn’t ever consider doing with the D-pad Kindle, even though it was theoretically possible.

But the touch screen does come with a big cost over the D-pad…

Click!

Lets imagine you’re reading a book. What’s the thing you’re going to do the most? That’s right: turn the page.

Now imagine that you’re in charge of making the world’s best ebook reader. What experience should you make the most pleasant? That’s right: page turning.

One of the best features of the D-pad Kindle was the dedicated page-turn buttons on the side of the device. They weren’t great buttons, but an adequate physical button for a frequently used task is 1,000 times better than the best touch-screen function could ever be.

Removing the buttons from the Kindle Paperwhite is a baffling decision. Page-turn buttons never made accidental pages and resting a thumb on the button, waiting to turn the page was simple and mindless.

As lazy as this sounds, a swipe or tap is a tiny distraction for every page turn. Gestures also make using the device one-handed just a bit more difficult.

The Kindle Paperwhite has three basic touch zones: most of the screen turns the page, while about an inch along the top brings up the menu and a bar along the left side goes back a page.

As I usually hold my Kindle in my left hand I looked for the setting to flip the tap zones to a left-handed mode. But, sadly, there is none. While it’s not too uncomfortable to do a swipe with my left thumb to turn the page, it’s another little dagger in my side that makes me miss the physical buttons of the D-pad Kindle.

The advantage of a dedicated ebook reader is that it’s a dedicated ebook reader. Unlike the iPad which has to be flexible, the Amazon engineers know exactly what people will use a Kindle to do: read. Taking away a button for the most-used task is a poor decision. If put in charge of the Kindle hardware team my number one priority would be to find the most satisfying button to click.

TL;DR

In the end, the Kindle Paperwhite reminds me a lot of my 3rd generation Retina iPad: a device with a great screen, that comes with some compromises.

But I bought the Kindle Paperwhite, to increase the amount I read, particularly when in bed, and to that end it is an unqualified success and my previous D-pad Kindle is up on eBay.

There is a little detail in the Paperwhite that I didn’t think much of at first but now can’t imagine reading without: on the bottom of the page it displays the approximate reading time left in the chapter – and this is no guess, but based on your actual reading speed. This seemingly minor addition allows me to make intelligent how-sleepy-am-I vs how-much-do-I-want-to-read-the-next chapter decisions that makes the whole process of reading at night frictionless.

If you’re thinking about getting an ebook reader, the Kindle Paperwhite, despite some of its irritations, is the one I highly recommend.

Thoughts on the New YouTube Design

1st: Stop Freaking Out

Let’s get this out of the way: YouTube, doesn’t change the design arbitrarily just to annoy you. They change it to try and improve it – and they aren’t just guessing at what might be better. YouTube does A/B tests to see how changes affect things like the number of videos watched, channel subscriptions and advertising revenue.

It’s reasonable to assume that YouTube releases new designs when user time spent on the site increases, even if you personally don't like change. That’s good news for video creators and viewers.

That being said, it’s still possible to have strong feelings about changes to the site which, as someone who spends far too much time on YouTube, I certainly do.

Aesthetics

While I do have complaints, in general I’m pleased with the redesign.  It's lighter and more spacious than the previous cosmic-panda-based design that I was not a fan of.   It was cramped and dark and and heavy.  The new design is more in the Google+ aesthetic – which some people don’t like – but l do. The bold colors, particularly the red for the page selector, on white are very Google-ish to my eye.

But, colors aside, the first thing you’re probably going to notice is the odd choice of left-aligning the whole site. It’s not really noticeable on my laptop but looks incredibly dumb on a large screen.

It's difficult to A/B test for 'looks dumb'.

Thankfully, the channel pages remain centered, but it gives the impression that some poor YouTube engineer forgot to close a DIV tag on the rest of the site.  Also, the left alignment really triggers my OCD when watching videos in the big (but not full-screen) view:

Video: Y U NO ONE INCH BIGGER?!?

Comments: Better, But Still Terrible

The addition of user icons to discussion is much welcome. The icons make regular commenters and friends in discussion much more visible.

But, YouTube can’t ever improve something in comments without making something worse. At the bottom of the page there used to be a link to see all comments which has been replaced by a ‘show more’ button.

It might not seem like much of a deal, but the ‘all comments’ link allowed you to sort comments by thread, which the ‘show more’ button does not.  YouTube threading is terrible, but better than nothing.  I thought that the feature had been removed entirely until I found it by accident lurking in the 'all comments' header that looks exactly like the other two unclickable headers.  

You’ll Watch What We Want & You’ll Like It

YouTube now dumps you on the ‘what to watch page’ by default. Perhaps it’s good for casual users without many subscriptions, but with 60+ subscriptions it’s a jumbled pile of crap with out-out-order uploads mixed in with playlist updates and videos people liked.

YouTube seems to treat subscribing to channels as merely information to feed into their algorithm to better suggest what you ‘really’ want to watch. I subscribe to channels because I want to watch them – and YouTube’s design changes have caused me to often miss new videos uploaded by the people I follow.  More and more I find myself leaning on the subscription digest to guide my YouTube viewing.

Weirdly, 'What to Watch' recommends videos I’ve already seen. Also I’m not sure what the ’Hide this Activity Button is supposed to do. My guess is that it’s supposed to be like the long-lost x button, but the wording is unclear at best (does it hide just this video or all videos from that channel?) and, when I tried to test it out of my own upload page, it seemed to do nothing at all.

Just what is this button supposed to do?

All I want is a reverse chronological order list of uploads from the channels I subscribe to where I can remove the videos I’ve already seen. Is that too much to ask?

YouTube Should be the World's Best TV, Not the World's Worst Social Network

The social integration is hideous and has to stop.  If I want to see what videos my friends are talking about on Facebook, I'll go to Facebook.  Actually, I never go to Facebook in the first place, because I'm not really interested in what people I knew 15 years ago think is funny.  

YouTube need to make the sit-back-and-just-watch-something experience better, which brings us to the next section:

Playlists: Vastly Better

The old, terrible, buggy playlist scroll along the bottom has been replaced with a more elegant one alongside the video.  Playlist deserve this much nicer implementation.  YouTube is too 'active' an experience right now, with users having to choose a new video to watch every couple minutes.  While that might not seem like a big deal, decisions are tiring.  The nicer YouTube can make playlists the longer people will watch.   

TL;DR

In summary, the new YouTube design is better than the last.  It's visually an improvement even though it still has usability issues and is developing social-network-wannabe issues.

In

Can Texas Secede from The Union?

I decided to make this video after the fuss about the latest petition let Texas secede from The Union. While these stories do pop up every few years the WhiteHouse.gov petition is interesting because it asks people when they sign for their state of residence.

I asked on Twitter if anyone could scrape the data and one of my followers, Ben Buchwald, came through. After shoving the raw data into a spreadsheet, here are the results:

The giant blue wedge is people from Texas, the big green wedge is people who didn't want to give their location, and the 2% to 1% wedges are the rest of the states, Puerto Rico and, interestingly, a few American military personnel overseas.

However, a graph like this isn't really very informative. The interesting question is which states most want Texas to go. Sorting by number of signatures isn't helpful because then you just end up with a graph of population. So I've divided the number of signatures by population to yield a graph of per-capita support for Texas secession in the other 49 states:

This graph was the exact opposite of my expected results: I guessed that Democratic states, such as New York and California would top the list and Republican States would be at the bottom, but the graph shows the exact opposite.

It looks like support for Texas leaving the Union is highest among those who a Texas exit would hurt the most politically.

Script

Can Texas Secede from the Union?

America's second most populated and second largest state is always first to remind you that it was once an independent nation: The Republic of Texas.

Unlike California's three-week, almost accidental flirt with independence (and a hideous flag) the Republic of Texas was a real country with its own presidents, and laws and currency for a decade from 1836 until 1846 when it joined the Union to become the 28th state, thankfully evening out the number of stars.

This happy marriage led pretty much immediately to the Mexican-American war over the question of over how big Texas was. America, as the victor, got to decide the answer: very big.

While Texas gave up its complete independence to join The Union, it didn't give up its independent streak -- and filed for divorce, along with several other states, a scant 15 years later. This domestic dispute was settled not with flowers but with force, something that many are still grumbly about today.

But History aside in modern times could Texas still be a real country? In other words: could Texas succeed if it secedes?

In terms of population, an independent Texas would be the world's 46th largest country with 26 million citizens. And, those citizens would make Texas the 13th largest economy. So the New Texas Republic would be comparable to Australia, except in the size department.

But what about the Federal money that goes to Texas? Those interstate highways don't build themselves, you know. For a majority of states, independence would be a financial problem. Mississippi, for example get two dollars from Washington for every one it sends in taxes so an independent Magnolia Republic would be bankrupt almost instantly.

But not Texas, which gives more money to the federal government in taxes than it gets back. There's no reason why independent Texas couldn't keep those highways paved and give its citizens a small happy-Texapendency-day Tax cut.

So from a financial perspective: The New Texas Republic gets a check.

Now the question is can Texas legally secede? And the answer is... no... not at all.

Despite popular belief, even by politicians who should know better, the Texas constitution does not include a get-out-of-The-Union-free clause no matter how much Texans, or citizens of other states, wish that it did.

However, the Texas Constitution does have a weird clause that allows it to divide itself into five states without the approval of congress. So Texas could, any moment, explode into the states perhaps named North Texas, South Texas, East Texas, West Texas and Austin -- which would quintuple its power in the Senate -- but not necessarily help it gain independence because there is no legal process for a state to exit The Union.

Though the constitution is mute on the issue, secession has come before the supreme court and, shockingly, the Supreme Court of the United States decided that States can't leave the United States.

But the legal question is, weirdly sort of moot. After all, the First Texas Republic didn't pop into existence out of nowhere -- Texas was originally a State of Mexico, which didn't allow Texas to leave, but leave Texas did anyway, though under less than harmonious circumstances.

While it's hard to imagine war between the New Texas Republic and the United States it isn't hard to imagine who would win that fight. Texas does have its own military, but seriously, nobody beats America in the war business.

So the only way Texas is leaving is if it can convince the United States to change its laws to let it leave. Which only as a chance of being discussed seriously if a majority of Texans want independence, which isn't remotely the case.

So while a New Texas Republic is interesting to think about -- particularly for some non-Texans, as of now it's a long way from becoming a reality.

Credits:

Images by rutlo and photoshop help from Larom Lancaster.

HyperAnalyze: Over Thinking My Two Favorite Podcasts

Much of my work involves tediously animating stick figures -- a time consuming, but mentally barren task. To keep my sanity during this process I listen to podcasts, a lot. Downcast, my podcasting app of choice, shows more than fifty subscriptions, all of which form an endless river of audio that has a prominent place in my life.

I've been thinking about the shows I listen to and why after an announcement from Marco Arment, the host of Build and Analyze.

Marco revealed on Twitter that Build and Analyze would end in a few episodes -- and I was incredibly disappointed. I felt compelled to send him a tweet saying that his podcast, along with Hypercritical by John Siracusa were my two favorites.

Three hours later, Siracusa announced the end of his show, as well.

I spent the evening disappointed. Mopey, even. Which, on reflection, felt ridiculous.

I've seen podcasts come and go, even podcasts that previously held the title of favorite, without much reaction on my part. Why was I sad this time? Thinking it over, each podcast had discussed half of the answer to my question in their previous shows.

Many podcasts, like RadioLab and 99% Invisible are, at their heart, well-produced radio shows. Old formats in a new medium.

But Build and Analyze and Hypercritical were different and Marco said it himself in a recent episode: they're natural podcasts. They're what the medium is best at, people just talking without the overhead or overproducedness of radio.

Both in both shows the respective hosts talk with Dan Benjamin about the things that interest them. (Dan hosts a number of podcasts at 5by5.) In Hypercritical Siracusa has a Steve-Jobs-like ability to explain the problems with things in an incredibly informative way. In Build and Analyze Marco is a thoughtful person, talking about what makes products good, family and business. And coffee.

While the podcasts are ostensibly about their topics, they're really an ongoing conversation.

Regular listening creates a (false) feeling of being part of a social group where people know each other: Mondays it's coffee with Marco and Dan, and then Fridays it's lunch with Siracusa and Dan. Sometimes Marco and Dan talk about Siracusa and sometimes Siracusa and Dan talk about Marco. I'm there too, a silent participant, doodling on my laptop, sipping my coffee, listening without anything to add -- content in the same way old friends can be.

Repeat natural podcasts like these every week for months and the end result is my monkey mind feels like it knows Siracusa, Marco and Dan though my human mind knows better.

As a person who's work has brought him some low-level of Internet fame, I understand it's weird -- and sometimes slightly creepy -- to be on the receiving end of that. But, nonetheless here I am, stuck with that same, irrational feeling of being sort-of friends with two people I don't actually know.

Two people who just died.

Not literally, of course.

Siracusa described the other half of why I'm sad now in a podcast about when Steve Jobs had retired from Apple. Siracusa attempted to write an article about Steve Jobs but what he produced was an obituary, even though the man was still alive at the time. Why?

Apple Keynotes were the only way people knew Steve Jobs. While Jobs had a personal life, it wasn't available to the public. So when Steve Jobs retired, it felt like he died because the part of his life that we got access to was over.

And so it is with these podcasts for me: the part of Marco's and Siracusa's life that I got access to, their weekly conversations on interesting topics is retired.

They're still alive and on twitter, both still write on the web and both may guest on Dan's new podcast, but their regular shows were a metronome in my unstructured work life: Marco started the week and Siracusa ended it.

My human mind is thankful for all the hours of insight, humor and learning that they've given me over this past year, but my monkey mind will still be sad for a while about the loss of friends it never really had.

In

Digital Aristotle: Thoughts on the Future of Education

Blog

Ever since I started working as a teacher seven years ago, the future of education has been on my mind. I'm not sure that my most recent vlog has well articulated my thoughts on the matter, but it's a start.

I'm the first to admit that I do a bit of handwaving at the end of the video about Digital Aristotle -- near-artificial-intelligent software doesn't just pop into existence. But I'm comfortable with the handwaving for two reasons:

  1. Technology evolves much faster than people expect.
  2. Real AI isn't necessary for my vision of Digital Aristotle anyway.

There is a lot to be done with just simple testing across massive groups of students and this is something that the people at The Khan Academy, among others, are working on.

One last point that I'd like to be clear on: almost by definition a computer program can't teach social skills. There will always be a place where working adults send their kids to be socialized. Because of that I don't think that schools are going anywhere in the long term, I just don't think that the formalized education part of those schools will be anything like what we do now.

Recommended Reading

If you want to see the most sci-fi vision of the future of education, I suggest reading The Diamond Age by Neil Stephenson. The main plot is about 'The Young Lady's Illustrated Primer' a computerized book. Coincidentally, The Diamond Age was the first book I read on a kindle, which made it a doubly enjoyable experience.

Links

Credits

Special thanks to YouTube EDU in general and Angela in particular for arranging the event.

YouTube EDU Artwork by Jessica Fan.

Music by Broke For Free

Images by jbirdjohanlgsfcmike52adgsfcmwicharylobsterstewwwworksx1brettlxn271moyermkfrtzalancleaverdubsarjasonffepugachevurosvelickovic56155476@N08fakeeyes