Skip directly to local search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home

NIOSH EVALUATION OF ITS CANCER AND REL POLICIES

Current Evaluation Efforts

NIOSH is currently reviewing its cancer (carcinogen) and related Recommended Exposure Limit (REL) policies to ensure that they reflect current scientific and risk management practices. The Federal Register notices and other resources in the Updates section above describe the process and the information requested from the public and stakeholders. A public meeting was held on Monday, December 12, 2011 in Washington, DC to allow stakeholders and other interested parties to ask questions and provide comments. NIOSH Docket 240 contains the public submissions received. Additional information about the NIOSH re-evaluation of its cancer and REL policies, including other Federal Register notices and the revised draft policies, will be posted on this page when available.


NIOSH Cancer Policy History

1975    NIOSH presents its cancer guidelines at the Conference on Occupational Carcinogenesis, organized by the New York Academy of Sciences. Published in 1976, these guidelines recommend “no detectable exposure levels for proven carcinogenic substances.”

Fairchild EJ [1976]. Guidelines for a NIOSH policy on occupational carcinogenesis. Ann NY Acad Sci 271:200-207.

1978    NIOSH testifies on the OSHA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the Identification, Classification, and Regulation of Toxic Substances Posing a Potential Occupational Carcinogenic Risk (i.e. the OSHA Cancer Policy). NIOSH commits to cooperating with OSHA in developing and applying this generic standard for potential occupational carcinogens. NIOSH indicates that good public health policy dictates that health risk be the primary consideration in the determination of exposure limits. NIOSH testifies to its general agreement with the definition of "potential occupational carcinogen" as stated in the OSHA Cancer policy:

“any substance, or combination or mixture of substances, which causes an increased incidence of benign and/or malignant neoplasms, or a substantial decrease in the latency period between exposure and onset of neoplasms in humans or in one or more experimental mammalian species as the result of any oral, respiratory, or dermal exposure, or any other exposure which results in the induction of tumors at a site other than the site of administration. This definition also includes any substance that is metabolized into one or more potential occupational carcinogens by mammals (29 CFR 1990.103, OSHA Cancer Policy).”

NIOSH recommends the following categories for carcinogens:

  • Category I: Probable [or Confirmed] Occupational Carcinogen
  • Category II: Suspect Occupational Carcinogen
  • Category III: Carcinogenic Evidence Inconclusive

NIOSH 1978 Testimony to OSHA on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking of OSHA Cancer Policy

1978    NIOSH uses the term “potential occupational carcinogen” in the NIOSH Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Glycidyl Ethers and other NIOSH documents.

1984    NIOSH reaffirms its support for and adoption of the OSHA Cancer Policy in several Current Intelligence Bulletins including dioxin, 1,3-butadiene, and cadmium, with variations on the following text: “There are several classifications for identifying a substance as a carcinogen. Such classifications have been developed by the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Toxicology Program, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and OSHA. NIOSH considers the OSHA classification the most appropriate for use in identifying carcinogens in the workplace. This classification is outlined in 29 CFR 1990.103.”

1988    NIOSH testifies on the OSHA Proposed Rule on Air Contaminants which includes proposed updates on many OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs). NIOSH reaffirms its policy that carcinogens should be restricted to the lowest feasible level. NIOSH indicates that OSHA should include carcinogen designations for all chemicals that meet the OSHA definition of “potential occupational carcinogen” as established in the OSHA Cancer Policy.
NIOSH 1988 Testimony to OSHA on the Proposed Rule on Air Contaminants

1995    The current NIOSH REL policy is issued for chemical carcinogens and other safety or health hazards, incorporating advances in science and approaches in risk assessment and risk management. It states that NIOSH RELs "will be based on risk evaluations using human or animal health effects data, and on an assessment of what levels can be feasibly achieved by engineering controls and measured by analytical techniques. To the extent feasible, NIOSH will project not only a no-effect exposure, but also exposure levels at which there may be residual risks. This policy applies to all workplace hazards, including carcinogens, and is responsive to Section 20(a)(3) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 ..." NIOSH 1995 REL Policy Statement

"The effect of this new policy will be the development, whenever possible, of quantitative RELs that are based on human and/or animal data, as well as on the consideration of technological feasibility for controlling workplace exposures to the REL. Under the old policy, RELs for most carcinogens were non-quantitative values labeled "lowest feasible concentration (LFC)." [Note: There are a few exceptions to LFC RELs for carcinogens (e.g., RELs for asbestos, formaldehyde, benzene, and ethylene oxide are quantitative values based primarily on analytical limits of detection or technological feasibility). Also, in 1989, NIOSH adopted several quantitative RELs for carcinogens from OSHA's permissible exposure limit (PEL) update.]

... Under the new policy, NIOSH will also recommend the complete range of respirators (as determined by the NIOSH Respirator Decision Logic) for carcinogens with quantitative RELs. In this way, respirators will be consistently recommended regardless of whether a substance is a carcinogen or a non-carcinogen."

NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards - Appendix A - NIOSH Potential Occupational Carcinogens
NIOSH Respirator Use Policy for Protection Against Carcinogens

2011    NIOSH requests public comments on the NIOSH cancer and REL policies. A public meeting is held December 12, in Washington, DC, to obtain public and stakeholder input.

Transcript of the NIOSH Public Meeting, December 12, 2011
Transcript - 12/12/11 [PDF - 525 KB]

Introduction to the NIOSH Public Meeting, Dr. Schulte’s Presentation [PDF - 473 KB]

2012    NIOSH is re-evaluating its cancer policy with public and stakeholder input to address concerns such as the use of the term "potential occupational carcinogen" which allows for only one cancer category. A list of the chemicals that NIOSH classifies as potential occupational carcinogens is available at the NIOSH List of Carcinogens. This list is revised as new data become available on previously evaluated chemicals and as additional chemicals are evaluated.


NIOSH REL Policy History

NIOSH develops RELs for workplace hazards to prevent and reduce workers’ risk of occupational cancer and other adverse health effects. RELs are intended to limit the concentration of the potential hazard in the workplace air to protect worker health.

1970    The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, Section 20(a)(3), charges NIOSH to "…describe exposure levels that are safe for various periods of employment, including but not limited to the exposure levels at which no employee will suffer impaired health or functional capacities or diminished life expectancy as a result of his work experience."

1988    NIOSH testifies on the OSHA Proposed Rule on Air Contaminants which includes proposed updates on many OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs). NIOSH adopts many of the proposed PELs.
NIOSH 1988 Testimony to OSHA on the Proposed Rule on Air Contaminants

Prior to 1995    The RELs developed for most carcinogens were non-quantitative values labeled "lowest feasible concentration (LFC)." Some RELs were established based on the analytic limit of quantitation. Other RELs were based on technologic feasibility, i.e., the capability to reduce exposures through the use of engineering controls.

1995    The current NIOSH REL policy is issued, incorporating advances in science and approaches in risk assessment and risk management. It states that NIOSH RELs “will be based on risk evaluations using human or animal health effects data, and on an assessment of what levels can be feasibly achieved by engineering controls and measured by analytical techniques. To the extent feasible, NIOSH will project not only a no-effect exposure, but also exposure levels at which there may be residual risks. This policy applies to all workplace hazards, including carcinogens, and is responsive to Section 20(a)(3) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 ...”
NIOSH 1995 REL Policy Statement

2011    NIOSH requests public comments on the NIOSH cancer and REL policies. A public meeting is held December 12, in Washington, DC, to obtain public and stakeholder input.

Transcript of the NIOSH Public Meeting, December 12, 2011
Transcript - 12/12/11 [PDF - 525 KB]

Introduction to the NIOSH Public Meeting, Dr. Schulte’s Presentation [PDF - 473 KB]

2012    NIOSH is re-evaluating its REL policy with public and stakeholder input to clarify issues such as the target working lifetime risk level and the application of "to the extent feasible" in the REL process. The NIOSH RELs developed for carcinogens and other chemical workplace hazards are listed in the NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. The Pocket Guide is updated as new RELs are developed.


NIOSH Occupational Carcinogen Resources


Other U.S. Cancer Policy Resources


International Cancer Policy Resources


Agents Identified as Carcinogens

 

 
Contact Us:
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - cdcinfo@cdc.gov