FY2011 Applicant Information - Investing in Innovation Funds (i3)

Highest-Rated Scale-Up Applications

Highest-Rated Validation Applications

Highest-Rated Development Applications

	Overview

	Contacts

	Offices
			ED Structure

			Offices


	Boards & Commissions

	Initiatives

	Publications

	ED Performance & Accountability

	Jobs

OFFICES
Investing in Innovation Fund (i3)

Office of Innovation and Improvement Home

Applicant Information

THE DEPARTMENT IS PROUD TO ANNOUNCE AND MAKE AVAILABLE QUALITY INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC REGARDING THE 2011
HIGHEST-RATED i3 APPLICANTS

Through www.data.ed.gov, the Department has already posted selected information on each i3 application received. With the announcement of the highest-rated i3 applicants, the Department continues its commitment to transparency by posting additional information. Specifically, we are adding a link to each highest-rated applicant’s abstract on www.data.ed.gov and in the chart below. Also in the chart below, we are posting application narratives and reviewers' comments and scores for all highest-rated applicants, as well as providing information on whether they have indicated to the Department that they have already secured their private sector match.

Scale-Up Applications || Validation Applications
|| Development Applications

Press release announcing i3 program's highest rated applicants.

Description of information provided in the table below MS Word (36KB).

* Information identified as either personal or proprietary was redacted from these narratives and technical review forms.

Applicant Information	Match Commitment Submitted & Confirmed?	Application Narratives	Comments and Scores
Applicant Name Old Dominion University Research Foundation Project Name Technology-facilitated Scale Up of Proven Model of Math Instruction in High Need Schools Raw Score: 86.33 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. PDF

Applicant Information

Match Commitment Submitted & Confirmed?

Application Narratives

Comments and Scores

Applicant Name
Old Dominion University Research Foundation

Project Name
Technology-facilitated Scale Up of Proven Model of Math Instruction in High Need Schools

Raw Score:
86.33

Abstract

Yes

Application
PDF

Reviewers' comments and raw scores.

PDF

Select the files below to download individual application narratives and reviewers' comments and scores.

Applicant Information	Match Commitment Submitted & Confirmed?	Application Narratives	Comments and Scores
Applicant Name University of Alaska Statewide Office of K-12 Outreach Project Name Alaska Statewide Mentor Project Urban Growth Opportunity Raw Score: 96.67 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. PDF
Applicant Name National Math and Science Initiative Project Name Partnership to Increase Student Achievement and College Readiness in STEM Education Raw Score: 96.17 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. PDF
Applicant Name New Visions For Public Schools, Inc Project Name New Visions - Accessing Algebra Through Inquiry Raw Score: 97.00 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. PDF
Applicant Name Regents of the University of Minnesota Project Name Midwest Expansion of the Child-Parent Center Education Program, Preschool to Third Grade Raw Score: 91.67 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. PDF
Applicant Name North Carolina New Schools Project Project Name Validating Early College Strategies (VECS) Raw Score: 87.67 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. PDF

Funding Status

Eligibility

Laws, Regs, & Guidance

Applicant Info

Performance

Select the files below to download individual application narratives and reviewers' comments and scores.

Applicant Information	Match Commitment Submitted & Confirmed?	Application Narratives	Comments and Scores
Applicant Name Aspire Public Schools Project Name Transforming Teacher Talent: Aspire Public Schools Comprehensive Approach to Effective Teaching in Low-Income Raw Score: 97.50 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name Texas Tech University Project Name Competency-based Educator Preparation & School Intervention Raw Score: 95.17 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Ed. Project Name Exceptional Coaching for Early Language and Literacy -Enhanced (ExCELL-E): Refining an Effective, Research-Based Raw Score: 94.00 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name New York City Board of Education Project Name InnovateNYC Raw Score: 99.00 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name New York Hall of Science Project Name SciGames: A Technology-enhanced Model for Bridging Informal and Formal Science Learning Raw Score: 98.50 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name Baltimore City Public Schools Project Name Middle School STEM Summer Learning Program Raw Score: 94.83 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name Fresno County Office of Education Project Name From Rhetoric to College Readiness: The Expository Reading and Writing Course Raw Score: 98.83 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name The College Board Project Name Student Success in AP Biology: Expanding the STEM College Readiness of High-Need Students (SSAP-BIO) Raw Score: 98.17 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name Oakland Unified School District Project Name Oakland Accelerates Raw Score: 97.33 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name Ounce of Prevention Fund Project Name Ounce Professional Development Initiative (PDI) Raw Score: 97.17 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name The Metropolitan Education Commission Project Name The Wisdom Project Raw Score: 100.50 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores.. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name Boston Public Schools Project Name Turnaround using Increased Learning Time (TILT) Raw Score: 95.00 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name Success for All Foundation Project Name Around the Corner: A Technology-Enhanced Approach to Early Literacy Raw Score: 94.50 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name Del Norte Unified School District Project Name Responding Effectively to Assessments with Curriculum and Teaching (REACT) Raw Score: 97.67 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name Berea College Project Name Accelerating Academic Achievement in Appalachian Kentucky Raw Score: 95.50 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name Kentucky Valley Educational Cooperative Project Name Career and College Readiness Transformations Raw Score: 94.50 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF
Applicant Name KnowledgeWorks Project Name Creating a Corridor of Innovation: Changing the Equations of Success in Rural, High Need High Schools Raw Score: 94.33 Abstract	Yes	Application PDF	Reviewers' comments and raw scores. Tier 1 PDF Tier 2 PDF

Printable view

Last Modified: 01/05/2012

	School Safety-Administrators

	School Safety-NCLB

	School Safety-Teachers