Federal Trade Commission
Protecting America's Consumers
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. E.M.A. Nationwide, Inc., a Florida corporation, also doing business as EMA and Expense Management America; New Life Financial Solutions, Inc., a Florida corporation, also doing business as New Life Financial, and New Life Financial Services; 1UC Inc., a Wyoming corporation, also doing business as 1st United Consultants, and First United Consultants; 7242701 Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation; 7242697, Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation; 7246293, Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation; 7246421, Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation; James Benhaim, also known as Jimmy Benhaim, individually and as an officer or director of E.M.A. Nationwide, Inc., New Life Financial Solutions, Inc., 1UC Inc., 7246293 Canada Inc., 7246421 Canada Inc., and 7242697 Canada Inc.; Daniel Michaels, also known as Dan Michaels, also known as Dan Michles, individually and as an officer or director of E.M.A. Nationwide, Inc., New Life Financial Solutions, Inc., 1UC Inc., and 7242701 Canada Inc.; Phillip Hee Min Kwon, also known as Phillip H. Kwon, individually and as an officer or director of E.M.A. Nationwide, Inc. and New Life Financial Solutions, Inc.; Joseph Shamolian, individually and as an officer or director of E.M.A. Nationwide, Inc. and New Life Financial Solutions, Inc.; and Nissim N. Ohayon, individually and as an officer or director of E.M.A. Nationwide, Inc., New Life Financial Solutions, Inc., and 1UC Inc., Defendants
(
United States District Court For the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division)
Case No. 1:12-CV-2394
FTC File No. 122 3069
October 9, 2012
- Complaint For Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief [PDF – 27 pages]
- Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Its Motion For An Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order With Appointment of A Receiver, Asset Freeze and Accounting, Expedited Discovery, and Order to Show Cause Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue [PDF – 37 pages]
- News Release