MODS Archives – January 2005

1. Couldnt finish! Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
   • Couldnt finish! Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!! (79 lines)
     From: Barzilai Spinak <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:46:03 -0200

2. Getting MADS back on track
   • Getting MADS back on track (64 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:18:21 -0500

3. I'm stupid Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
   • I'm stupid Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!! (24 lines)
     From: Barzilai Spinak <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:01:06 -0200

4. Language coding (WAS Re: [MODS] New MADS draft, January 13)
   • Language coding (WAS Re: [MODS] New MADS draft, January 13) (136 lines)
     From: Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:26:30 -0500

5. MADS bug report
   • Re: MADS bug report (25 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:20:35 -0500

6. merits of a type library
   • merits of a type library (76 lines)
     From: Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:11:15 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (52 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:41:22 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (36 lines)
     From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:11:23 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (48 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:40:03 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (26 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:49:39 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (27 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:10:09 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (61 lines)
     From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:12:08 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (55 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:36:44 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (67 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:27:11 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (35 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:06:25 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (67 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:59:13 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (62 lines)
     From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:17:05 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (18 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:20:51 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (74 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:46:53 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (36 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:44:38 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (32 lines)
     From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:24:41 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (42 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:52:43 -0500
   • Re: merits of a type library (21 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:18:50 -0500

7. MODS and Atom?
   • MODS and Atom? (28 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:32:43 -0500
   • Re: MODS and Atom? (23 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:53:57 -0500

8. MODS part
   • MODS part (43 lines)
     From: Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:26:01 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (67 lines)
     From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:51:39 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (30 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:52:46 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (49 lines)
     From: Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:56:48 -0800
   • Re: MODS part (108 lines)
     From: Ruth Bogan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:09:43 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (39 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:39:43 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (77 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:39:21 +0000
   • Re: MODS part (122 lines)
     From: Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:57:28 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (31 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:07:30 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (62 lines)
     From: Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:18:49 -0800
   • Re: MODS part (79 lines)
     From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:34:22 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (60 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:35:52 +0000
   • Re: MODS part (39 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:08:23 +0000
   • Re: MODS part (78 lines)
     From: Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:02:01 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (44 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:12:18 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (25 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:16:28 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (82 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:54:07 +0000
   • Re: MODS part (73 lines)
     From: Dick Thaxter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:54:31 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (39 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:01:18 +0000
   • Re: MODS part (42 lines)
     From: Ruth Bogan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:20:13 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (63 lines)
     From: Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:40:44 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (32 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:09:40 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (118 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:41:49 +0000
   • Re: MODS part (164 lines)
     From: Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:33:48 -0800
   • MODS part (81 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:49:32 +0000
   • Re: MODS part (62 lines)
     From: Dick Thaxter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:10:20 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (145 lines)
     From: Dick Thaxter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:17:48 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (111 lines)
     From: Dick Thaxter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:11:24 -0500
   • Re: MODS part (163 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:15:57 +0000
   • Re: MODS part (119 lines)
     From: Mike Rylander <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 16:20:06 +0000

9. New MADS draft, January 13
   • New MADS draft, January 13 (34 lines)
     From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:27:00 -0500
   • Re: New MADS draft, January 13 (33 lines)
     From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:45:35 -0500
   • Re: New MADS draft, January 13 (20 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:43:24 -0500
   • Re: New MADS draft, January 13 (28 lines)
     From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:46:48 -0500
   • Re: New MADS draft, January 13 (26 lines)
     From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:31:25 -0500
   • Re: New MADS draft, January 13 (57 lines)
     From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:13:52 -0500
   • Re: New MADS draft, January 13 (73 lines)
     From: Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:43:30 -0500
   • Re: New MADS draft, January 13 (96 lines)
     From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:57:13 -0500

10. On what system does MODS run?
    • On what system does MODS run? (59 lines)
      From: Bill Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:35:10 -0600
    • Re: On what system does MODS run? (23 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:07:58 -0500
    • Re: On what system does MODS run? (37 lines)
      From: Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:48:06 -0500

11. Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
    • Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!! (26 lines)
      From: Barzilai Spinak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:12:41 -0200
    • Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!! (23 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:39:09 -0500
    • Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!! (51 lines)
      From: Barzilai Spinak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 02:16:06 -0200
    • Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!! (34 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:42:24 -0500

12. purpose of a type library
    • purpose of a type library (40 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:03:03 -0500
    • Re: purpose of a type library (58 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:11:49 -0500

13. RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
    • Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion (115 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:42:03 -0500
    • Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion (50 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:16:05 -0500
    • Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion (24 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:26:19 -0500
    • Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion (85 lines)
      From: Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:44:55 -0800
    • Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion (44 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:56:31 -0500
    • Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion (45 lines)
      From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 21:01:34 -0500
    • Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion (56 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:30:35 -0500
    • Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion (78 lines)
      From: Barbara B Tillett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:18:23 -0500
    • Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion (98 lines)
      From: Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:48:17 -0500
    • Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion (33 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:00:11 -0500
    • Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion (73 lines)
      From: Diane Hillmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:44:00 -0500

14. Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
    • Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!! (72 lines)
      From: Barzilai Spinak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:24:47 -0200

15. Schema validation
    • Schema validation (38 lines)
      From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:56:30 -0500

16. Type library and unqualified local elements
    • Type library and unqualified local elements (67 lines)
      From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:36:54 -0500

17. Unifying MODS and MADS namespace
    • Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (29 lines)
      From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:51:52 -0500

18. Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
    • Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library) (24 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:59:50 -0500
    • Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library) (42 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:26:46 -0500
    • Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library) (34 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:33:49 -0500
    • Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library) (24 lines)
      From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:41:23 -0500
    • Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library) (42 lines)
      From: Andrew E Switala <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:47:46 -0500
    • Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library) (39 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:55:01 -0500
    • Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library) (30 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:30:00 -0500

19. Using the <extension> element
    • Using the <extension> element (80 lines)
      From: Ruth Bogan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:49:28 -0500
    • Re: Using the <extension> element (123 lines)
      From: Riley, Jenn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:33:05 -0500
    • Re: Using the <extension> element (148 lines)
      From: Ruth Bogan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:00:24 -0500

20. why is mods allowed as root?
    • why is mods allowed as root? (18 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:59:37 -0500
    • Re: why is mods allowed as root? (24 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:02:35 -0500
    • Re: why is mods allowed as root? (32 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:16:20 -0500
    • Re: why is mods allowed as root? (42 lines)
      From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:08:37 -0500
    • Re: why is mods allowed as root? (121 lines)
      From: Nathan L Trail <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:24:19 -0500
    • Re: why is mods allowed as root? (121 lines)
      From: Nathan L Trail <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:24:19 -0500
    • Re: why is mods allowed as root? (22 lines)
      From: Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:37:01 -0500