UNITED STATES COURT OF CLAIMS V. JEROME WIEMAN T/A MERCHANT SERVICE COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES No. 109-80C 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 1388 V. Jerome Wieman, Pro se Randall B. Weill, with whom was Acting Assistant Attorney General Thomas S. Martin, for defendant. NICHOLS, Judge, Presiding, KASHIWA and SMITH, Judges. ORDER This case is before us on cross-motions for summary judgment. The plaintiff is not represented by counsel. He did business in his individual capacity trading as Merchant Service Company. He had two contracts with the Government Printing Office (GPO) for hauling paper stock. Both were terminated for default but he contends that defendant drove him out of business by various acts including harassment and sabotage by its employees. There may be a question who rightfully is prosecuting the claim as plaintiff says he is bankrupt. Plaintiff prosecuted his claim before the GPO Board of Contract Appeals which held against him. He seeks Wunderlich review, 41 U.S.C. �� 321, 322, but the inartfully drafted petition includes allegations that also assert a breach or breaches of the contracts. So far as the proceeding is to obtain Wunderlich Act relief, the issues are not of law but involve whether numerous findings of the board are or are not supported by substantial evidence. There is need of the services of the trial division to ascertain if plaintiff is the proper person to prosecute the claim, to clarify and amend the pleadings, to separate for trial purposes, if necessary, breach issues, to determine whether substantial evidence in the record supports the board findings, and to take whatever other steps are necessary for a just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of the claim. Accordingly, the cross-motions for summary judgment are referred to the trial division under Rule 54(a) and the suspension of the case is lifted, leaving the trial division to take whatever steps are necessary to execute this order. April 10, 1981