Selecting Primary Sources, Part IV: Considering Quality

This is the final post in a series discussing characteristics to consider when selecting primary sources to use with your students.

At the beginning of each Library of Congress Summer Teacher Institute, the participants introduce themselves and explain their goals for the week. In every group of teachers there are a few that explain that they just received an interactive white board or a class set of iPods, iPads, or laptops and are interested in finding digitized primary source content they can use with the new technology.

"The mealing trough--Hopi." By Edward S. Curtis, c1906.

With the push for technology in schools and stories of districts going “one-to-one,” it’s easy to forget that there are still many teachers and students with very little access to technology.

The good news is that the Library of Congress is working to make its digitized resources accessible and useful to all teachers, no matter what classroom technology they have available. And with millions of digitized items, it is important to select primary sources that are high quality.

A great place to begin your search is the Library of Congress Teachers Page where you’ll find sets of 15-20 primary sources, organized by topic, that include some of the most engaging and highest quality items from the Library’s collections.

In these primary source sets, the digitized primary sources, which are perfect for teachers with access to technology, are accompanied by printable PDF versions, for those without a projector or class set of laptops.

In addition to the Teachers Page, we encourage you to explore the rest of the Library of Congress Web site.

When you select high quality primary sources to use with your students, consider the following factors:

  • Clarity, resolution: Are you using the highest quality image or film available on the Library’s Web site? Is the image or film clear enough for students to find important details and make reflections about what’s happening?

Hint: Images on the Library of Congress Web site often have several downloadable versions, including various JPEG and TIFF file sizes. Consider using a larger file type when projecting an image or enlarging an image for printable handouts.

  • Legibility of text/handwriting: Is the text clearly printed and legible? Can your students read and understand cursive handwriting?

Hint: Some digitized manuscripts from the Library’s collections are accompanied by transcripts. Although the transcripts are generally considered secondary sources, they are a tool that can accompany a primary source and make it easier to use with students.

  • Audibility, background noises: Is the voice in the sound recording or film loud and clear enough for students to understand the message? Are there background noises that make the message inaudible?

Hint: The Library of Congress’ National Jukebox includes more than 10,000 recordings made by the Victor Talking Machine Company between 1901 and 1925. You can browse the recordings and create playlists to stream in class.

  • Ability to zoom in on details: Do the digitized images or maps have the ability to zoom in on details? Can the same zoom ability be recreated in print form, or is the primary source best used in its digital format?

Hint: The digitized maps from the Library’s Map Collections have a zoom view that enables viewers to find minute details on the high resolution maps.

I used the image in this blog post when working with 2nd grade students who were studying Native American tribes. The crispness of the photo lent itself to close observation of details.

Please share one of your favorite high-quality primary sources from the Library’s collections by linking to it in your comment. If you’ve used the primary source with students, what was the topic of your lesson?

 

Add a Comment

This blog is governed by the general rules of respectful civil discourse. You are fully responsible for everything that you post. The content of all comments is released into the public domain unless clearly stated otherwise. The Library of Congress does not control the content posted. Nevertheless, the Library of Congress may monitor any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove content for any reason whatever, without consent. Gratuitous links to sites are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on the Library site. Read our Comment and Posting Policy.

Required fields are indicated with an * asterisk.