Your browser does not support CSS and therefor you are seeing
a plain, functional page rather than the modern, designed site. The site is
fully functional this way, just not as nice to look at. To see this site as it
was intended, please upgrade to a modern browser like
Mozilla Firefox,
Opera,
Netscape (7 or higher) or Internet
Explorer (6 or higher).
Search General Jurisdiction
| 02/13/2013 | Hewitt | RED HAWK CONSTRUCTION, INC. V. THE UNITED STATES [12-186C] | Dismissal of Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction Because Plaintiff Is Without the Rights Plaintiff Claims in the Proceeds of a Government Contract |
| 02/08/2013 | Firestone | STEVEN JENKINS, et al. V. THE UNITED STATES [09-241L] | ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION |
| 02/08/2013 | Lettow | J.C.N. CONSTRUCTION, INC. V. UNITED STATES [12-353C] | ORDER |
| 02/08/2013 | Miller, G. | JOHN THOMAS V. THE UNITED STATES [10-303C] | OPINION AND ORDER |
| 02/08/2013 | Firestone | MARK S. RASMUSON and BRENDA S. RASMUSON, husband and wife, et al. V. THE UNITED STATES [09-158L] | Rails to Trails; Construction of Fee Deeds under Iowa Law; No Taking Where Railroad Owns Right-of-way in Fee |
| 02/08/2013 | Firestone | STEVEN JENKINS, et al. V. THE UNITED STATES [09-241L] | ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION |
| 02/08/2013 | Firestone | D’ANDREA BROTHERS LLC V. THE UNITED STATES [08-286C] | CRADA and Licensing Agreement; Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; “Reasonableness” Standard; Prior Material Breach; Reliance Damages; Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 349 |
| 02/07/2013 | Allegra | LOUIS A. BURGESS, et al. V. THE UNITED STATES [09-242L] | Takings case; Cross-motions for partial summary judgment; Rails-to-Trails Act; Determination of claimant’s property interests; Preseault; Iowa law construed; Easements for railroad purposes; Railroad relocation – fee simple deeds |
| 02/07/2013 | Lettow | CONSTANCE SPEED V. UNITED STATES [10-125C] | Claim for damages stemming from alleged breach of a settlement agreement; motion for summary judgment; unambiguous language of agreement; bar on use of extrinsic evidence to create ambiguity |
| 02/06/2013 | Firestone | JAMES H. WOLLMAN V. THE UNITED STATES [12-125C] | 10 U.S.C. §1201 (2006) and 37 U.S.C. § 204(a)(2006); Military Disability Retirement; Existed Prior to Service, “EPTS”; Presumption of Incurrence and Aggravation; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(2), Remand. |
