Skip Navigation
Skip Navigation
Archive icon With the completion of the three implementation goals of the Enhancing Peer Review Initiative, this page is no longer being updated and is provided for historical information only.  For current information, visit Peer Review Policies and Practices. Archive icon

Enhancing Peer Review at NIH

Implementation Goals

Engage the Best Reviewers
The excellence of peer review is directly correlated to our ability to recruit and retain the most accomplished, broad-thinking and creative scientists to serve on study sections.

Improve the Quality & Transparency of Review
Peer review must consistently identify an application’s relative merit, potential for scientific and/or public health impact, and feasibility. 

Ensure Balanced & Fair Reviews
Peer review should fairly evaluate proposals from all scientists, regardless of their career stage or discipline, and avoid bias toward more conservative and proven approaches at the expense of innovation and originality.

Continuous Review of Peer Review
A critical component in assuring core values of peer review is the continuous review of peer review activities.

Refer to the timeline to see how these goals were carried out.











This page was last reviewed on February 22, 2010
Archive icon With the completion of the three implementation goals of the Enhancing Peer Review Initiative, this page is no longer being updated and is provided for historical information only.  For current information, visit Peer Review Policies and Practices. Archive icon
skip main navigation National Institutes of Health - Transforming Health Through Discovery U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Information Page NIH Grants News and Events Research Institutes and Centers About NIH