The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
-
4:26
The US Census Bureau: The Importance of Accuracyby uscensusbureau
2,016 views
-
11:46
First 2010 Census Results News Conference Highlightsby uscensusbureau
1,583 views
-
2:53
2010 Census Data Visualization: Interactive Population Mapby uscensusbureau
4,812 views
-
2:37
Measuring America: Upcoming Census Bureau data releases measure the United Statesby uscensusbureau
1,591 views
-
6:48
Census Video Part 2, Clarificationsby minivanjack
35,578 views
-
2:47
2011 uk census ONS at a friends doorby petemartinali
19,229 views
-
2:16
U.S. Census Bureau - American Community Survey 2010by Shonda Smith
35,505 views
-
5:16
Amazing Statisticsby VGBusiness
113,598 views
-
1:48
Keith's Amazing Machinesby ksrucker
26,543 views
-
2:39
Write in "Taiwanese" - US Census 2010 [PSA Full Version]by SlideshowPics
236,982 views
-
2:25
Standard Deviants Reapportionmentby rogandmick
2,372 views
-
0:31
The Amazing Treat Machineby AmazingTreatMachine
16,134 views
-
3:38
The Redistricting Songby propublica
20,789 views
-
5:04
#01 Intro to Apportionment.USby apportionmentus
1,085 views
-
1:35
2010 Census resultsby wluk
2,477 views
-
5:06
2010 Census: see http://bit.ly/2010census for better sound.by Jordan Schaffel
5,467 views
-
3:19
Animaniacs - Presidentsby Eoin O'Liathain
4,692,910 views
-
2:48
Redistrictingby KRQE
717 views
-
2:46
How It Happens: Legislative Districtsby IllustratedEssays
6,103 views
-
3:40
Standard Deviants Structure and Leadership of Congressby rogandmick
2,319 views
All Comments (28)
y11971alex 3 weeks ago
Yes, but to keep congressional representation to a reasonable size, the smaller states, which other wise would receive fractional number of congressmen, would need at least one congressmen as you can't have 5/6 of a congressmen representing Wyoming.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
NerdyLiberal 4 months ago
Don't be stupid. In our current system, people in large states get much, MUCH less representation than small states. Per capita in the house is about the same, but in the senate? Why the fuck should a state 1/50th the size of California get the same number of senators? There is more diversity of opinion within the bay area than there is in all of Wyoming...
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mastermenthe 8 months ago
THIS VIDEO EXPLAINS NOTHING
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
thefurminatorreview 9 months ago
no it does not need to be this complicated!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
catscatscatz 10 months ago
Fuck....no. California and New York are chronically under represented. Small states usually get far less people per representative. We should add several hundred seats to the house and california, new york, new jersey would get dozens of more seats that we deserve
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
tzimisces1 10 months ago
........ they are? what are you talking about?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
why435org 1 year ago
Does it really need to be this complicated? why435.org has the answer.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Deisongp 1 year ago
interesting..but, wouldnt it be better, and easier, elect the representatives by popular vote?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
dnissen2012 1 year ago
If you look at an unmodified version of the formula, and rank solely on people per representative, California should get less, as well as Texas and New York. Montana, South Dakota, and Delaware should all get 2.
But nooooooooo...it has to be some complicated formula that has massive bias to larger states,
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
dnissen2012 1 year ago
Look at Project 30,000. I don't have a website, but it is a project that limits the people per representative to 60,000.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube