Materials Reviewed
The materials below were reviewed for Readiness for Dissemination. The implementation
point of contact can provide information regarding implementation of the intervention
and the availability of additional, updated, or new materials.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (2006). Therapeutic community curriculum: Participant's manual (DHHS Publication No. [SMA] 06-4122). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (2006). Therapeutic community curriculum: Trainer's manual (DHHS Publication No. [SMA] 06-4121). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Covington, S. (1999). A woman's journal (participant workbook from Helping women recover: A program for treating substance abuse, criminal justice edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Covington, S. (2000). A woman's way through the twelve steps. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
Covington, S. (2002). Women in recovery: Understanding addiction. Carson City, NV: The Change Companies.
Covington, S. (2003). A healing journey: A workbook for women (participant workbook from Beyond trauma: A healing journey for women). Center City, MN: Hazelden.
De Leon, G., Melnick, G., & Center for Therapeutic Community Research. (1993). Therapeutic community Survey of Essential Elements Questionnaire (SEEQ)--Short form. New York: Community Studies Institute.
Fry, R., Johnson, S., Melendez, P., & Morgan, R. (1998). A parent's guide to changing destructive adolescent behavior. Ontario, CA: Parent Project.
Gordon Graham and Company, Inc. (1993). A framework for recovery. Bellevue, WA: Authors.
Gordon Graham and Company, Inc. (1998). A framework for breaking barriers. Bellevue, WA: Authors.
Gorski, T. (1997). The GORSKI-CENAPS model: An overview. Homewood, IL: Author.
Gorski, T., & Trundy, A. (2000). Relapse prevention counseling workbook: Practical exercises for managing high-risk situations. Homewood, IL: Terence T. Gorski.
Handouts:
- AWARE Questionnaire--Revised
- Client Satisfaction Survey
- Client Satisfaction Survey Procedure
- Client Satisfaction Survey Report
- Covington, S. (2005). Helping women recover: Creating gender-responsive services [PowerPoint handout].
- Group Schedule
- NREPP Overview of Forever Free Substance Abuse Program
- NREPP Overview: Training and Support Resources
- PowerPoint slide presentations from trainings and workshops
- Training and workshop overviews
- Treatment Components
- Workshop Schedule
Hermes, S. (1998). Assertiveness: Practical skills for positive communication. Center City, MN: Hazelden Foundation.
Readiness for Dissemination Ratings by Criteria (0.0-4.0 scale)
External reviewers independently evaluate the intervention's Readiness for Dissemination
using three criteria:
- Availability of implementation materials
- Availability of training and support resources
- Availability of quality assurance procedures
For more information about these criteria and the meaning of the ratings, see Readiness for Dissemination.
Implementation
Materials
|
Training and Support
Resources
|
Quality Assurance
Procedures
|
Overall
Rating
|
1.3
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
0.8
|
Dissemination Strengths
The program uses best-practice materials from a variety of expert resources targeted to this specific population. Some training materials are provided for topic areas relevant to the intervention. A client satisfaction survey and a standardized therapeutic community fidelity measure are provided to support quality assurance.
Dissemination Weaknesses
The program materials are specific to one implementation site and may not be easily adapted or transferred to other implementation sites. The relationship between the submitted program materials is unclear. While implementation, program goals, and recommendations for staffing are addressed in some of the materials, the guidance across these materials is inconsistent. No support resources specific to the program and its implementation are provided. The connection between the quality assurance measures provided and the program model is unclear. Materials state that one implementation site was engaged in external quality reviews, but no standards or protocols for evaluation or quality assessment are provided.