Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center
Home > Studies > AVID

Resources Available

Study Datasets Only

Study Documents

PDF Data Dictionary (PDF - 898.1 KB)
PDF Code Manual (PDF - 515.6 KB)
PDF Contents (PDF - 70.7 KB)
Forms (HTML )

Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in the study documents. For assistance, Contact BioLINCC and include the web address and/or publication title in your message.

If you need help accessing information in different file formats such as PDF, XLS, DOC, see Instructions for Downloading Viewers and Players.

Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID)

Clinical Trials URL:
Study Type: Clinical Trial
Prepared on October 13, 2008
Last Updated on June 23, 2005
Study Dates: 1992-2002
Consent: Unrestricted Consent
Commercial Use Restrictions: No
NHLBI Division: DCVS
Collection Type: Open BioLINCC Study - See bottom of this webpage for request information


To evaluate if use of an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) results in reduction in total mortality, when compared with conventional pharmacological therapy, in patients resuscitated from sudden cardiac death who are otherwise at very high risk of mortality from arrhythmic causes.


Sudden cardiac death is believed to account for a substantial portion of deaths with evidence of cardiovascular disease. The majority of sudden cardiac deaths are thought to be due to ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia. Currently the most common approach to preventing sudden cardiac death has been using drugs that suppress ventricular ectopy. However, given the disappointing results of most pharmacologic approaches to preventing sudden death, many investigators have turned to non-pharmacologic approaches such as surgery (endocardial resection, stellate ganglionectomy) or the implantation of devices that recognize VT or VF and deliver a shock. The greatest interest has been generated by work on the implantable cardiac defibrillator.


The study was designed in two phases. The pilot phase enrolled 200 patients between June 194 and June 1994. Data collected during the pilot phase cofirmed the trial was feasible. An additional 1,000 patients was subsequently enrolled.


At approximately 28 clinical sites, patients with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were screened. Patients meeting the criteria were randomized to treatment with an ICD or treatment with antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Patients were followed every 3 months for assessment of secondary endpoints, to record therapies delivered by the ICD and potential adverse effects of the ICD, and to assess compliance and potential adverse symptoms in patients treated with anti arrhythmic drugs.