What are Research Ethics Cases?
Adapted from the UCSD Online Resource for Instruction in Responsible Conduct of Research <http://rcr.ucsd.edu> *
Research Ethics Cases are a tool for discussing scientific integrity. Cases are designed to confront the readers with a specific problem that does not lend itself to easy answers. By providing a focus for discussion, cases help staff involved in research to define or refine their own standards, to appreciate alternative approaches to identifying and resolving ethical problems, and to develop skills for dealing with hard problems on their own.
For Facilitators Leading Case Discussions
For the sake of time and clarity of purpose, it is essential that one individual have responsibility for leading the group discussion. As a minimum, this responsibility should include:
1. Reading the case aloud.
2. Defining, and re-defining as needed, the questions to be answered.
3. Encouraging discussion that is "on topic".
4. Discouraging discussion that is "off topic".
5. Keeping the pace of discussion appropriate to the time available.
6. Eliciting contributions from all members of the discussion group.
7. Summarizing both majority and minority opinions at the end of the discussion.
How should cases be analyzed?
Many of the skills necessary to analyze case studies can become tools for responding to real world problems. Cases, like the real world, contain uncertainties and ambiguities. Readers are encouraged to identify key issues, make assumptions as needed, and articulate options for resolution. In addition to the specific questions accompanying each case, readers should consider the following questions:
1. Who are the affected parties (individuals, institutions, a field, society) in this situation?
2. What interest(s) (material, financial, ethical, other) does each party have in the situation? Which interests are in conflict?
3. Were the actions taken by each of the affected parties acceptable (ethical, legal, moral, or common sense)? If not, are there circumstances under which those actions would have been acceptable? Who should impose what sanction(s)?
4. What other courses of action are open to each of the affected parties? What is the likely outcome of each course of action?
5. For each party involved, what course of action would you take, and why?
6. What actions could have been taken to avoid the conflict?
Is there a right answer?
ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS
Most problems will have several acceptable solutions or answers, but it will not always be the case that a perfect solution can be found. At times, even the best solution will still have some unsatisfactory consequences.
UNACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS
While more than one acceptable solution may be possible, not all solutions are acceptable. For example, obvious violations of specific rules and regulations or of generally accepted standards of conduct would typically be unacceptable. However, it is also plausible that blind adherence to accepted rules or standards would sometimes be an unacceptable course of action.
ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING
It should be noted that ethical decision-making is a process rather than a specific correct answer. In this sense, unethical behavior is defined by a failure to engage in the process of ethical decision-making. It is always unacceptable to have made no reasonable attempt to define a consistent and defensible basis for conduct.
* ©2000 The Regents of the University of California
All Rights Reservedhttp://rcr.ucsd.edu
1.Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute any part of this Web site for educational, research or non-profit purposes, without fee, and without a written agreement is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice, this paragraph and the following three paragraphs appear with all copies. In addition, if the material used also includes other credit or copyright information, then this source information should also be included with all copies.
2.Those desiring to incorporate this material into commercial products or use for commercial purposes should contact:
Technology Transfer & Intellectual Property Services
University of California, San Diego
9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0910
Ph: (858) 534-5815
FAX: (858) 534-7345
http://invent.ucsd.edu
3.In no event shall the University of California be liable to any party for direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, including lost profits, arising out of the use of this Web site, even if the University of California has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
4.The resources provided herein are on an "as is" basis, and the University of California has no obligation to provide maintenance, support, updates, enhancements, or modifications. The University of California makes no representations and extends no warranties of any kind, either implied or express, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, or that the use of these resources will not infringe any patent, trademark or other rights.