Skip Navigation
PrintDownload PDFGet Adobe ReaderDownload to WordDownload as HTMLDownload as XMLCitation Manager
Save to Favorites
Guideline Summary
Guideline Title
Intracranial angioplasty and stenting for cerebral atherosclerosis: a position statement of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology.
Bibliographic Source(s)
Higashida RT, Meyers PM, Connors JJ 3rd, Sacks D, Strother CM, Barr JD, Wojak JC, Duckwiler GR. Intracranial angioplasty and stenting for cerebral atherosclerosis: a position statement of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009 Jul;20(7 Suppl):S312-6. [49 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy
Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

Jump ToGuideline ClassificationRelated Content
FDA Warning/Regulatory Alert

Note from the National Guideline Clearinghouse: This guideline references a drug(s) for which important revised regulatory and/or warning information has been released.

  • March 1, 2012 – Statins and HIV or Hepatitis C drugs External Web Site Policy: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notified healthcare professionals of updates to the prescribing information concerning interactions between protease inhibitors and certain statin drugs. Protease inhibitors and statins taken together may raise the blood levels of statins and increase the risk for muscle injury (myopathy). The most serious form of myopathy, called rhabdomyolysis, can damage the kidneys and lead to kidney failure, which can be fatal.
  • February 28, 2012 – Statin drugs External Web Site Policy: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved important safety label changes for the class of cholesterol-lowering drugs known as statins. The changes include removal of routine monitoring of liver enzymes from drug labels. Information about the potential for generally non-serious and reversible cognitive side effects and reports of increased blood sugar and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels has been added to the statin labels. The lovastatin label has been extensively updated with new contraindications and dose limitations when it is taken with certain medicines that can increase the risk for muscle injury.

Scope

Disease/Condition(s)

Intracranial cerebral atherosclerosis

Guideline Category
Management
Prevention
Risk Assessment
Treatment
Clinical Specialty
Critical Care
Family Practice
Internal Medicine
Neurological Surgery
Neurology
Preventive Medicine
Radiology
Intended Users
Advanced Practice Nurses
Hospitals
Nurses
Physicians
Guideline Objective(s)

To provide a position statement for intracranial angioplasty and stenting for cerebral atherosclerosis

Target Population

Patients with intracranial stenoses who have failed medical therapy

Interventions and Practices Considered
  1. Intracranial angioplasty with or without stenting for symptomatic patients with a >50% intracranial stenosis who have failed medical therapy
  2. For asymptomatic patients: monitoring (magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomographic angiography, cerebral angiography) and optimizing prophylactic medical therapy (antiplatelet drugs and/or statins)
Major Outcomes Considered
  • Annual ischemic stroke rate
  • Success rate of intracranial angioplasty and stenting
  • Complication rate including death

Methodology

Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
Searches of Electronic Databases
Description of Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence

An in-depth literature search is performed using electronic medical literature databases. The Medline database was searched from 1980 to 2009.

Number of Source Documents

Not stated

Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
Not stated
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence

Not applicable

Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Systematic Review
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence

Not stated

Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Expert Consensus
Description of Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations

Not stated

Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations

Not applicable

Cost Analysis

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

Method of Guideline Validation
Internal Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation

Not stated

Recommendations

Major Recommendations

Current Position Statement of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (ASITN), Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), and American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)

  1. For symptomatic patients with a >50% intracranial stenosis who have failed medical therapy, balloon angioplasty with or without stenting should be considered.
  2. Patients who have an asymptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis should first be counseled regarding optimizing medical therapy. There is insufficient evidence to make definitive recommendations regarding endovascular therapy in asymptomatic patients with severe intracranial atherosclerosis. They should be counseled regarding the nature and extent of their disease, monitored for new neurological symptoms, and have periodic noninvasive imaging at regular intervals of 6 to 12 months (magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomographic angiography) initially, and then by cerebral angiography if warranted. At a minimum, optimal prophylactic medical therapy should be instituted, which might include antiplatelet and/or statin therapy.
  3. Continued evaluation and improvements in both pharmacological and catheter-based therapies are needed to reduce the stroke burden from intracranial atherosclerosis.

Conclusion

The ASITN, SIR, and ASNR concur that sufficient evidence now exists to recommend that intracranial angioplasty with or without stenting should be offered to symptomatic patients with intracranial stenoses who have failed medical therapy. Endovascular interventions are intensive services provided to patients who are at very high risk for stroke and typically have multiple comorbidities. Similar to revascularization for extracranial carotid artery stenosis, patient benefit from revascularization for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis is critically dependent on a low periprocedural stroke and death rate and should thus be performed by experienced neurointerventionists. The guideline developers recommend reimbursement by third party insurers so that these patients may have access to such interventions. Continued attempts to improve medical therapy as well as improve the benefits of endovascular therapy are warranted.

Clinical Algorithm(s)

None provided

Evidence Supporting the Recommendations

Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations

The type of supporting evidence is not specifically stated for each recommendation.

Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations

Potential Benefits

Prevention of stroke

Potential Harms

Complications of intracranial angioplasty include angiographic vessel dissection, vessel thrombosis requiring fibrinolysis, asymptomatic restenosis, periprocedural transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, and death.

Implementation of the Guideline

Description of Implementation Strategy

An implementation strategy was not provided.

Implementation Tools
Patient Resources
For information about availability, see the Availability of Companion Documents and Patient Resources fields below.

Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Healthcare Quality Report Categories

IOM Care Need
Getting Better
Staying Healthy
IOM Domain
Effectiveness
Safety

Identifying Information and Availability

Bibliographic Source(s)
Higashida RT, Meyers PM, Connors JJ 3rd, Sacks D, Strother CM, Barr JD, Wojak JC, Duckwiler GR. Intracranial angioplasty and stenting for cerebral atherosclerosis: a position statement of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009 Jul;20(7 Suppl):S312-6. [49 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy
Adaptation

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

Date Released
2009 Jul
Guideline Developer(s)
American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology - Professional Association
American Society of Neuroradiology - Professional Association
Society of Interventional Radiology - Medical Specialty Society
Source(s) of Funding

Society of Interventional Radiology

Guideline Committee

Standards of Practice Committee

Composition of Group That Authored the Guideline

Committee Members: Randall T. Higashida, MD; Philip M. Meyers, MD; John J. Connors, III, MD; David Sacks, MD; C.M. Strother, MD; John D. Barr, MD; Joan C. Wojak, MD; and Gary R. Duckwiler, MD

Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest

None of the authors have identified a conflict of interest.

Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

Guideline Availability

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Web site External Web Site Policy.

Print copies: Available from the Society of Interventional Radiology, 10201 Lee Highway, Suite 500, Fairfax, VA 22030.

Availability of Companion Documents

None available

Patient Resources

The following is available:

Please note: This patient information is intended to provide health professionals with information to share with their patients to help them better understand their health and their diagnosed disorders. By providing access to this patient information, it is not the intention of NGC to provide specific medical advice for particular patients. Rather we urge patients and their representatives to review this material and then to consult with a licensed health professional for evaluation of treatment options suitable for them as well as for diagnosis and answers to their personal medical questions. This patient information has been derived and prepared from a guideline for health care professionals included on NGC by the authors or publishers of that original guideline. The patient information is not reviewed by NGC to establish whether or not it accurately reflects the original guideline's content.

NGC Status

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on August 22, 2011. The information was verified by the guideline developer on September 8, 2011. This summary was updated by ECRI Institute on April 13, 2012 following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisories on Statin Drugs and Statins and HIV or Hepatitis C drugs.

Copyright Statement

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

Disclaimer

NGC Disclaimer

The National Guideline Clearinghouseâ„¢ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

Read full disclaimer...