Skip Navigation
PrintDownload PDFGet Adobe ReaderDownload to WordDownload as HTMLDownload as XMLCitation Manager
Save to Favorites
Guideline Summary
Guideline Title
Guideline on antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients at risk for infection.
Bibliographic Source(s)
Clinical Affairs Committee, Council on Clinical Affairs. Guideline on antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients at risk for infection. Chicago (IL): American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD); 2011. 5 p. [27 references]
Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Clinical Affairs Committee, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Guideline on antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients at risk for infection. Pediatr Dent 2008-2009;30(7 Suppl):215-8.

Jump ToGuideline ClassificationRelated Content

Scope

Disease/Condition(s)

Bacteremia-induced infections, including infective endocarditis, following dental procedures

Guideline Category
Management
Prevention
Clinical Specialty
Dentistry
Pediatrics
Preventive Medicine
Intended Users
Dentists
Guideline Objective(s)

To help practitioners make decisions regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients at risk for bacteremia-induced infection

Target Population

Pediatric patients with medical conditions that predispose them to bacteremia-induced infections following dental procedures, including patients with cardiac conditions; patients with compromised immunity; patients with shunts, indwelling catheters, or medical devices; and patients with prosthetic joints

Interventions and Practices Considered
  1. Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing dental procedures
  2. Consultation for management of some implanted devices
Major Outcomes Considered

Incidence of bacteremia-induced infection

Methodology

Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
Hand-searches of Published Literature (Primary Sources)
Hand-searches of Published Literature (Secondary Sources)
Searches of Electronic Databases
Description of Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence

This guideline is an update of the previous document adopted in 1990 and last revised in 2008. It is based on a review of current dental and medical literature pertaining to post procedural bacteremia-induced infections. The update included a systematic literature search of the PubMed® electronic database with the following parameters: Terms: "infective endocarditis" (IE), "bacteremia", "antibiotic prophylaxis", AND and "dental infection"; Fields: all; Limits: within the last 15 years, humans, clinical trials, and birth through age 18. One hundred thirteen articles matched these criteria. Papers for review were chosen from this list and from the references within selected articles. When data did not appear sufficient or were inconclusive, recommendations were based upon expert and/or consensus opinion by experienced researchers and clinicians. In addition, "Prevention of infective endocarditis: Guidelines from the American Heart Association" was reviewed.

Number of Source Documents

Not stated

Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
Expert Consensus (Committee)
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence

Not applicable

Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Review
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence

Not stated

Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Expert Consensus
Description of Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations

The oral health policies and clinical guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) are developed under the direction of the Board of Trustees (BOT), utilizing the resources and expertise of its membership operating through the Council on Clinical Affairs (CCA).

Proposals to develop or modify policies and guidelines may originate from 4 sources:

  1. The officers or trustees acting at any meeting of the BOT
  2. A council, committee, or task force in its report to the BOT
  3. Any member of the AAPD who submits a written request to the BOT as per the AAPD Administrative Policy and Procedure Manual, Section 9
  4. Officers, trustees, council and committee chairs, or other participants at the AAPD's Annual Strategic Planning Session

Regardless of the source, proposals are considered carefully, and those deemed sufficiently meritorious by a majority vote of the BOT are referred to the CCA for development or review/revision.

Once a charge (directive from the BOT) for development or review/revision of an oral health policy or clinical guideline is sent to the CCA, it is assigned to 1 or more members of the CCA for completion. CCA members are instructed to follow the specified format for a policy or guideline. Oral health policies and clinical guidelines utilize 2 sources of evidence: the scientific literature and experts in the field. CCA, in collaboration with the Council on Scientific Affairs, performs a comprehensive literature review for each document. When scientific data do not appear conclusive, experts may be consulted.

The CCA meets on an interim basis to discuss proposed oral health policies and clinical guidelines. Each new or reviewed/revised policy and guideline is discussed, amended if necessary, and confirmed by the entire council.

Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations

Not applicable

Cost Analysis

A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.

Method of Guideline Validation
Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation

Once developed by the Council on Clinical Affairs (CCA), the proposed policy or guideline is submitted for the consideration of the Board of Trustees. While the Board may request revision, in which case it is returned to the council for modification, once accepted by majority vote of the Board, it is referred for Reference Committee hearing at the upcoming Annual Session. The Reference Committee hearing is an open forum for the membership to provide comment or suggestion for alteration of the document. CCA carefully considers all remarks presented at the Reference Committee hearing prior to submitting its final document for ratification by a majority vote of the membership present and voting at the General Assembly. If accepted by the General Assembly, either as proposed or as amended by that body, the document then becomes the official American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) oral health policy or clinical guideline for publication in the AAPD's Reference Manual and on the AAPD's website.

Recommendations

Major Recommendations

The conservative use of antibiotics is indicated to minimize the risk of developing resistance to current antibiotic regimens. Given the increasing number of organisms that have developed resistance to current antibiotic regimens, as well as the potential for an adverse anaphylactic reaction to the drug administered, it is best to be judicious in the use of antibiotics for the prevention of infective endocarditis (IE) and other distant-site infections.

Patients with Cardiac Conditions

Dental practitioners should consider prophylactic measures to minimize the risk of IE in patients with underlying cardiac conditions. The risk of developing IE can arise from a combination of high-risk patients and dental procedures. However, at-risk patients with poor oral hygiene and gingival bleeding after routine activities (e.g., toothbrushing) also have shown an increased potential for developing complications of IE. It, therefore, is recommended to encourage daily good oral hygiene practices to reduce gingivitis as part of the prophylactic regimen. These patients and/or parents need to be educated and motivated to maintain personal oral hygiene through daily plaque removal, including flossing. Greater emphasis should be placed on improved access to dental care and oral health in patients with underlying cardiac conditions at high risk for IE and less focus on a dental procedure and antibiotic coverage. Professional prevention strategies should be based upon the individual's assessed risk for caries and periodontal disease.

Specific recommendations from the latest American Heart Association (AHA) guideline on prevention of IE are included in the tables below. The AHA recommends antibiotic prophylaxis only for those whose underlying cardiac conditions are associated with the highest risk of adverse outcome (see Table 1 below). Such conditions include prosthetic heart valves, previous history of IE, unrepaired or incompletely repaired cyanotic congenital heart disease (CHD), completely repaired congenital heart defect with prosthetic material or device during the first 6 months after the procedure, repaired CHD with residual defects at the site or adjacent to the site of a prosthetic patch or device, and cardiac transplantation recipients who develop cardiac valvulopathy. In addition to those diagnoses listed in the AHA guidelines, patients with a reported history of injection drug use may be considered at risk for developing IE in the absence of cardiac anomalies. Although quite rare, complications from intraoral tongue piercing can include IE among patients with a pre-existing cardiac valvular condition and/or history of injection drug use. Consultation with the patient's physician may be necessary to determine susceptibility to bacteremia-induced infections.

Antibiotics are recommended for all dental procedures that involve manipulation of gingival tissue or the periapical region of teeth or perforation of the oral mucosa (see Table 2 below). Specific antibiotic regimens can be found in Table 3 in the original guideline document. Practitioners and patients/parents can review the entire AHA guidelines in the AHA Circulation Journal archives, http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/116/15/1736 External Web Site Policy for additional background information as well as discussion of special circumstances (e.g., patients already receiving antibiotic therapy, patients on anticoagulant therapy).

Patients with Compromised Immunity

Patients with a compromised immune system may not be able to tolerate a transient bacteremia following invasive dental procedures. These non-cardiac factors can place a patient with compromised immunity at risk for distant-site infection from a dental procedure. This category includes, but is not limited to, patients with the following medical conditions:

  1. Immunosuppression secondary to:
    1. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
    2. Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCIDS)
    3. Neutropenia
    4. Cancer chemotherapy
    5. Hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation
  2. Head and neck radiotherapy
  3. Autoimmune disease (e.g., juvenile arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus)
  4. Sickle cell anemia
  5. Asplenism or status post splenectomy
  6. Chronic steroid usage
  7. Diabetes
  8. Bisphosphonate therapy

Consultation with the child's physician is recommended for management of patients with a compromised immune system. Discussion of antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing chemotherapy, irradiation, and hematopoietic cell transplantation appears in a separate American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) guideline (see the National Guideline Clearinghouse [NGC] summary Guideline on Dental Management of Pediatric Patients Receiving Chemotherapy, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, and/or Radiation).

Patients with Shunts, Indwelling Vascular Catheters, or Medical Devices

The AHA recommends that antibiotic prophylaxis for nonvalvular devices, including indwelling vascular catheters (central lines) and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED), is indicated only at the time of placement of these devices in order to prevent surgical site infection. The AHA found no convincing evidence that microorganisms associated with dental procedures cause infection of CIED and nonvalvular devices at any time after implantation. The infections occurring after device implantation most often are caused by Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci or other microorganisms that are non-oral in origin but are associated with surgical implantation or other active infections. The AHA further states that immunosuppression is not an independent risk factor for nonvalvular device infections; immunocompromised hosts who have those devices should receive antibiotic prophylaxis as advocated for immunocompetent hosts. Consultation with the child's physician is recommended for management of patients with nonvalvular devices.

Ventriculoatrial (VA), ventriculocardiac (VC), or ventriculovenous (VV) shunts for hydrocephalus are at risk of bacteremia-induced infections due to their vascular access. In contrast, ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts do not involve any vascular structures and, consequently, do not require antibiotic prophylaxis. Consultation with the child's physician is recommended for management of patients with vascular shunts.

Patients with Prosthetic Joints

For patients with a history of total joint arthroplasty, deep hematogenous infections can lead to life threatening complications such as a loss of the prosthetic joint or even increased morbidity and mortality. A 2009 information statement published by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) recommends that dentists consider antibiotic prophylaxis for at-risk joint replacement patients who are undergoing an invasive procedure. Patients with an increased risk of hematogenous total joint infection are all patients with a prosthetic joint replacement, previous prosthetic joint infection, inflammatory arthropathies (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus), megaprosthesis, hemophilia, malnourishment, and compromised immunity (see examples above). However, AAOS states that clinical judgment must consider the potential benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis versus the risks of adverse reactions for each patient. The AAPD recognizes that there are varying recommendations from AAOS and the American Dental Association (ADA) with regards to antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with joint replacement. However, the AAOS is collaborating with the American Dental Association to develop evidence-based recommendations on antibiotic prophylaxis for patients at a high risk for hematogenous total joint infection.

Currently, the AAPD endorses the 2003 common recommendations of the ADA and the AAOS for management of patients with prosthetic joints. Antibiotic prophylaxis has not shown a significant reduction in the risk of developing joint infections subsequent to dental procedures. Therefore, antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated for dental patients with pins, plates, screws, or other hardware that is not within a synovial joint nor is it indicated routinely for most dental patients with total joint replacements. Antibiotics may be considered when high-risk dental procedures (see Table 2 below) are performed for patients within 2 years following implant surgery, immunocompromised patients with total joint arthroplasty, or patients who have had previous joint infections.

Consultation with the child's physician may be necessary for management of at-risk patients as well as patients with other implanted devices (e.g., Harrington rods, external fixation devices). In addition, as consensus may change following this review, practitioners are encouraged to follow the literature for the most current information on antibiotic prophylaxis.

Table 1. Cardiac Conditions Associated with the Highest Risk of Adverse Outcome from Endocarditis for Which Prophylaxis with Dental Procedures Is Reasonable

Prosthetic cardiac valve or prosthetic material used for cardiac valve repair

Previous infective endocarditis

Congenital heart disease (CHD)*

Unrepaired cyanotic CHD, including palliative shunts and conduits

Completely repaired congenital heart defect with prosthetic material or device, whether placed by surgery or by catheter intervention, during the first 6 months after the procedure**

Repaired CHD with residual defects at the site or adjacent to the site of a prosthetic patch or prosthetic device (which inhibit endothelialization)

Cardiac transplantation recipients who develop cardiac valvulopathy

* Except for the conditions listed above, antibiotic prophylaxis is no longer recommended for any other form of CHD.

** Prophylaxis is reasonable because endothelialization of prosthetic material occurs within 6 months after the procedure.

Circulation 2007;116:1745.

Table 2. Dental Procedures for which Endocarditis Prophylaxis Is Reasonable for Patients in Table 1

All dental procedures that involve manipulation of gingival tissue or the periapical region of teeth or perforation of the oral mucosa*

*The following procedures and events do not need prophylaxis: routine anesthetic injections through noninfected tissue, taking dental radiographs, placement of removable prosthodontic or orthodontic appliances, adjustment of orthodontic appliances, placement of orthodontic brackets, shedding of deciduous teeth, and bleeding from trauma to the lips or oral mucosa.

Circulation 2007;116:1746.

Clinical Algorithm(s)

None provided

Evidence Supporting the Recommendations

Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations

The type of evidence supporting the recommendations is not specifically stated for each recommendation.

When data did not appear sufficient or were inconclusive, recommendations were based upon expert and/or consensus opinion by experienced researchers and clinicians.

Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations

Potential Benefits

Prevention of post-procedural bacteremia in dental patients at risk

Potential Harms
  • Antibiotic usage may result in the development of resistant organisms.
  • Risk of antibiotic-associated adverse events

Contraindications

Contraindications

Cephalosporins should not be used in an individual with a history of anaphylaxis, angioedema, or urticaria with penicillins or ampicillin.

Implementation of the Guideline

Description of Implementation Strategy

An implementation strategy was not provided.

Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Healthcare Quality Report Categories

IOM Care Need
Staying Healthy
IOM Domain
Effectiveness

Identifying Information and Availability

Bibliographic Source(s)
Clinical Affairs Committee, Council on Clinical Affairs. Guideline on antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients at risk for infection. Chicago (IL): American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD); 2011. 5 p. [27 references]
Adaptation

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

Date Released
2002 (revised 2011)
Guideline Developer(s)
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry - Professional Association
Source(s) of Funding

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry

Guideline Committee

Clinical Affairs Committee

Composition of Group That Authored the Guideline

Not stated

Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest

Council members and consultants derive no financial compensation from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) for their participation and are asked to disclose potential conflicts of interest.

Guideline Status

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Clinical Affairs Committee, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Guideline on antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients at risk for infection. Pediatr Dent 2008-2009;30(7 Suppl):215-8.

Guideline Availability

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Web site External Web Site Policy.

Print copies: Available from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, 211 East Chicago Avenue, Suite 700, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

Availability of Companion Documents

Information about the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) mission and guideline development process is available on the AAPD Web site External Web Site Policy.

Patient Resources

None available

NGC Status

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on August 18, 2005. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on June 8, 2009. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on July 14, 2009. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on January 19, 2012.

Copyright Statement

This summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

Disclaimer

NGC Disclaimer

The National Guideline Clearinghouseâ„¢ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

Read full disclaimer...