USDA's Economic Research Service
TopicsTopics

Stay Connected

Follow ERS on Twitter
Subscribe to RSS feeds
Subscribe to ERS e-Newsletters.aspx
Listen to ERS podcasts
Read ERS blogs at USDA

Peer Reviews

The U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has issued guidelines for the peer review of important scientific information before it is disseminated by the Federal Government. OMB published its "Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review" in the Federal Register on January 14, 2005, at 70 FR 2664-2677. 16x16 - PDF The Bulletin provides specific requirements for peer reviews of highly influential scientific assessments and influential scientific information that are disseminated by Federal agencies, including posting the agenda and plans for such peer reviews on agency websites.

ERS Agenda for Peer Reviews of Highly Influential Scientific Assessments

At this time, ERS has no agenda of forthcoming highly influential scientific assessments to post on its website in accordance with OMB's Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review. PDF

ERS Agenda for Peer Reviews of Influential Scientific Information

ERS's economists and social scientists conduct research to inform public and private decisionmaking on economic and policy issues involving food, farming, natural resources, and rural development.  The agency's research program is aimed at the information needs of USDA, other public policy officials, and the research community. ERS information and analysis is also used by the media, trade associations, public interest groups, and the general public.  ERS disseminates economic information and research results through an array of outlets.

ERS has two types of report series that could contain potentially influential scientific information: ERS research reports; and Outlook Special Reports.  The peer review process varies for each series.  All reports in each series are included in ERS's peer review agenda for potentially influential scientific information. 

  • ERS research reports-Division management submits ERS research reports, including Economic Briefs, Economic Information Bulletins, Technical Bulletins, and Economic Research Reports, to the ERS Peer Review Council to develop the peer review plan and coordinate the peer review process.  Each report submitted to the Peer Review Council is reviewed by a minimum of two external economists/subject specialists and one economist from ERS. In addition, subject specialists from USDA agencies potentially affected by the research provide technical reviews. All reviews are double blind (the reviewers do not know the identity of the report author(s) and the author(s) do not know the names of the reviewers). Review criteria are detailed in request letters PDF icon (16x16) sent to each reviewer.
  • Outlook Special Reports-Outlook Special Reports deliver time-sensitive information related to the forces shaping commodity markets and trade.  These reports provide analysis of commodity market conditions, production, supply, and use, both domestically and internationally. Outlook Special Reports are reviewed by ERS staff, external commodity and market specialists, and subject experts on the World Agricultural Outlook Board.

Cleared manuscripts are posted on the ERS website. For a complete list, see the Publications catalog.

In accordance with OMB's Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review, PDF ERS's Peer Review Agenda for potentially influential scientific information is reported below. The agenda is updated quarterly.

ERS Peer Review Agenda for Potentially Influential Scientific Information
(Under review as of December 31, 2012)
Working Title Description Peer Review Plan
Food and Commodity Price Stabilization Policies: A Synthesis Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

Drivers of Global Land Use Change

Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

Making Sense of Recent Cost-of-Foodborne-Illness Estimates

Economic Information Bulletin
16x16 - PDF

Processing Meat and Poultry for Local Markets: From Convenience to Commitment

Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

Are Farmers Improving Fertilizer Nutrient-Use Efficiency in Corn, Cotton, Winter Wheat and Soybean Plantings?

Economic Information Bulletin
16x16 - PDF

Growth and Evolution in China's Agricultural Support Policies

Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

Working the Land with 10 Acres: Small Acreage Farming in the U.S.

Economic Information Bulletin
16x16 - PDF

Non-convergence in Domestic Commodity Futures Markets: Causes, Consequences and Remedies

Economic Information Bulletin
16x16 - PDF

The Economics of Glyphosate Resistance Management

Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

Recession and Recovery in Rural America

Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

The First Fifteen Years of Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States

Economic Information Bulletin
16x16 - PDF

Assessing the Growth of U.S. Broiler Exports

Special Outlook Report
16x16 - PDF

Forecasting World Raw Sugar Prices:The Influence of Brazilian Costs of Production and World Surplus/Deficit Measures

Special Outlook Report
16x16 - PDF

Multi-Program Participation in SNAP and Unemployment Insurance: How Tight are the Strands of the Recessionary Safety Net?

Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

Alternative Dairy Policy Programs: Analysis of Risk Management and Margin Insurance

Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

Production Cost and the Joint Adoption of Precision Technologies

Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

U.S. Wheat Production: Background and Costs of Production

Economic Information Bulletin
16x16 - PDF

Produce Sourcing and Transportation Cost Effects on Wholesale Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Prices

Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

Association Between Total Diet Cost and Diet Quality is Limited

Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

Food Insecurity in Households with Children in 2010-11: Prevalence, Severity, and Household Characteristics

Economic Information Bulletin
16x16 - PDF

Nutrition Standards Would Impact Availability of Most Competitive Foods but Have Smaller Revenue Effects for Most School Foodservices

Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

Emerging Energy Industries and Rural Growth

Economic Research Report
16x16 - PDF

See completed peer reviews

Contact

For information on ERS's agenda and plans for peer reviews of highly influential scientific assessments and influential scientific information, contact:

Daniel Pick
Economic Research Service
355 E Street, SW
Washington, DC 20024-3221
email: dpick@ers.usda.gov
phone: (202) 694-5278

USDA Resources

The USDA website provides more information on:

Last updated: Monday, January 14, 2013

For more information contact: Daniel Pick