Maternal Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution and Term Birth Weight: A Multi-Country Evaluation of Effect and Heterogeneity

Payam Dadvand,^1,2,3 Jennifer Parker,⁴ Michelle L. Bell,⁵ Matteo Bonzini,⁶ Michael Brauer,⁷ Lyndsey Darrow,⁸ Ulrike Gehring,⁹ Svetlana V. Glinianaia,¹⁰ Nelson Gouveia,¹¹ Eun-hee Ha,¹² Jong Han Leem,¹³ Edith H. van den Hooven,^14,15 Bin Jalaludin,^16,17,18 Bill M. Jesdale,¹⁹ Johanna Lepeule,^20,21,22 Rachel Morello-Frosch,^19,23 Geoffrey G. Morgan,^24,25 Angela Cecilia Pesatori,²⁶ Frank H. Pierik,¹⁵ Tanja Pless-Mulloli,¹⁰ David Q. Rich,²⁷ Sheela Sathyanarayana,²⁸ Juhee Seo,¹² Rémy Slama,^21,22 Matthew Strickland,⁸ Lillian Tamburic,²⁹ Daniel Wartenberg,³⁰ Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen,^1,2,3 Tracey J. Woodruff³¹

¹Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain; ²Municipal Institute of Medical Research (IMIM-Hospital del Mar), Barcelona, Spain; ³CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; ⁴National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA; ⁵Yale University, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; ⁶Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; ⁷University of British Columbia, School of Population and Public Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; ⁸Department of Environmental Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ⁹Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; ¹⁰Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom; ¹¹Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil; ¹²Department of Preventive Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; ¹³Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea; ¹⁴Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; ¹⁵Urban Environment and Safety, TNO, Utrecht, The Netherlands; ¹⁶Centre for Research, Evidence Management and Surveillance, Sydney, Australia; ¹⁷South Western Sydney Local Health Districts, Sydney, Australia; ¹⁸School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; ¹⁹Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California–Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA; ²⁰Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; ²¹Team of Environmental Epidemiology applied to Reproduction and Respiratory Health, INSERM, U823, Institut Albert Bonniot, Grenoble, France; ²²Grenoble University, U823, Institut Albert Bonniot, Grenoble, France; ²³School of Public Health, University of California–Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA; ²⁴North Coast Area Health Service, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia; ²⁵University Centre for Rural Health–North Coast, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; ²⁶Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy; ²⁷Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA; ²⁸Seattle Children’s Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; ²⁹University of British Columbia, Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; ³⁰UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA; ³¹Center for Reproductive Health and the Environment, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Advance Publication

Abstract

Background: A growing body of evidence has associated maternal exposure to air pollution with adverse effects on fetal growth; however, the existing literature is inconsistent.

Objectives: To quantify the association between maternal exposure to particulate air pollution and term birth weight and low birth weight (LBW) across fourteen centers from nine countries and to explore the influence of site characteristics and exposure assessment methods on between-center heterogeneity in this association.

Methods: Using a common analytical protocol, International Collaboration on Air Pollution and Pregnancy Outcomes (ICAPPO) centers generated effect estimates for term LBW and continuous birth weight associated with PM₁₀ and PM_2.5. We used meta-analysis to combine the estimates of effect across centers (~3 million births) and used meta-regression to evaluate the influence of center characteristics and exposure assessment methods on between-center heterogeneity in reported effect estimates.

Results: In random effects meta-analyses, term LBW was positively associated with 10-μg/m³ increase in PM₁₀ (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.05) and PM_2.5 (OR= 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.18) exposure during the entire pregnancy, adjusted for maternal socioeconomic status. 10-μg/m³ increase in PM₁₀ exposure was also negatively associated with term birth weight as a continuous outcome in the fully adjusted random effects meta-analyses (-8.9g; 95% CI: -13.2, -4.6g). Meta-regressions revealed that centers with higher median PM_2.5 levels and PM_2.5/PM₁₀ ratios, and centers that used a temporal exposure assessment (compared to spatiotemporal), tended to report stronger associations.

Conclusion: Maternal exposure to particulate pollution was associated with low birth weight at term across study populations. We detected three site characteristics and aspects of exposure assessment methodology that appeared to contribute to the variation in associations reported by centers.

Citation: Dadvand P, Parker P, Bell ML, Bonzini M, Brauer M, Darrow L, Gehring U, Glinianaia SV, Gouveia N, Ha EH, Leem JH, van den Hooven EH, Jalaludin B, Jesdale BM, Lepeule J, Morello-Frosch R, Morgan GG, Pesatori AC, Pierik FH, Pless-Mulloli T, Rich DQ, Sathyanarayana S, Seo J, Slama R, Strickland M, Tamburic L, Wartenberg D, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Woodruff TJ. Environ Health Perspect (): .doi:10.1289/ehp.1205575

Received: June 5, 2012; Accepted: December 28, 2012; Published: February 6, 2013

Advance Publication

This EHP Advance Publication article has been peer-reviewed, revised, and accepted for publication. The EHP Advance Publication articles are completely citable using the assigned DOI code for the article. This document will be replaced with the copyedited and formatted version as soon as it is available. Through the DOI number used in the citation, you will be able to access this document at each stage of the publication process.