U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs; National Institute of Justice The Research, Development, and Evaluation Agency of the U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice ProgramsNational Institute of JusticeThe Research, Development, and Evaluation Agency of the U.S. Department of Justice

Tailoring Policies for Effective Sex Offender Re-entry Into Communities

Alisa Klein, Public Policy Consultant, Association for the Treatment of Sex Abusers, Beaverton, Oregon
NIJ Conference 2010
June 14-16

This player requires Adobe's Flash Player Exit Notice

Tailoring Policies for Effective Sex Offender Re-entry Into Communities

Alisa Klein, Public Policy Consultant, Association for the Treatment of Sex Abusers, Beaverton, Oregon
NIJ Conference 2010
June 14-16

Alisa Klein: There's a trend in sex offender policy right now and it is to increase punishment, increase surveillance and to really monitor sex offenders in a way that we've seen from the research is actually not very effective. We're seeing two things in particular. We're seeing residence restrictions for sex offenders from state to state. We currently have 27 states that have implemented residence restrictions for sex offenders and then hundreds and hundreds of other local jurisdictions — counties, cities, towns and townships — that are also implementing residence restrictions that are often harsher than those that are implemented by the state.

The other trend we're seeing is community notification, and that is something actually that's now mandated at the federal level. We're seeing 50 states, 197 Indian tribes and the five U.S. territories are all mandated by the federal government to implement a particular form of community notification. It's Internet-based notification, broad notification for all sex offenders no matter what their level of risk to the community.

Both of these things are things that we have good solid research on that show us that in fact these are not the methodologies that we need to put into place to keep sex offenders from reoffending. In fact, we're seeing collateral consequences from this kind of legislation, from this kind of policy.

I think that this kind of mega-focus on sex offenders, the known sex offenders, is problematic. We do need to find ways and implement the ways that research is telling us work to manage sex offenders, to supervise them once they return to communities. What we need to be looking at is risk and protective factors. Who is at risk to perpetrate, who we can keep from perpetrating in the future, so that the focus really needs to be moving towards primary prevention and also bringing more of a collaborative approach to how we respond to known sex offenders.

I think that a really important point for us to be focusing on is the role that victim advocacy can play in primary prevention, in the management of sex offenders. It is victims and the people that work with them who know best what victims want, what community members want. We need to be listening to them.

Reuse or Repost This Video

Information generated by the National Institute of Justice is in the public domain. It may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without permission. Please cite NIJ as the source of the information by using the following words:

"The [insert the name of you organization] gratefully acknowledges the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, for allowing us to reproduce, in part or in whole, the video [insert title]. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this video are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice."

U.S. Department of Justice Disclaimer

The content presented in this video results from NIJ-funded research, development and evaluation projects. The content is not intended to create, does not create, and may not be relied upon to create any rights, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party in any matter civil or criminal.

Opinions or points of view expressed in this video represent those of the speakers and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Any products and manufacturers discussed in this video are presented for informational purposes only and do not constitute product approval or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Justice.

See additional Legal Policies and Disclaimers for all U.S. Department of Justice Web content.

NIJ Conference
Interview
June 2010
Alisa Klein, Public Policy Consultant, Association for the Treatment of Sex Abusers

NIJ Conference 2010 Highlights

Date created: August 6, 2010