Go to the Table Of Contents

Results from the 2009
National Survey on Drug Use and Health:
Volume I. Summary of National Findings

 

 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Office of Applied Studies

Acknowledgments

This report was prepared by the Office of Applied Studies (OAS), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and by RTI International (a trade name of Research Triangle Institute), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Work by RTI was performed under Contract No. 283-2004-00022.

Public Domain Notice

All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA. Citation of the source is appreciated. However, this publication may not be reproduced or distributed for a fee without the specific, written authorization of the Office of Communications, SAMHSA, HHS.

Recommended Citation

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2010). Results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Volume I. Summary of National Findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-38A, HHS Publication No. SMA 10-4856Findings). Rockville, MD.

Electronic Access and Copies of Publication

This publication may be downloaded from http://www.oas.samhsa.gov. Hard copies may be obtained from http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/copies.cfm. Or please call SAMHSA's Health Information Network at 1-877-SAMHSA-7 (1-877-726-4727) (English and Español).

Originating Office

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Office of Applied Studies
Division of Population Surveys
1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 7-1044
Rockville, MD 20857

September 2010

Table of Contents

Highlights

1. Introduction
1.1. Summary of NSDUH
1.2. Limitations on Trend Measurement
1.3. Format of Report and Explanation of Tables
1.4. Other NSDUH Reports and Data

2. Illicit Drug Use
Age
Youths Aged 12 to 17
Young Adults Aged 18 to 25
Adults Aged 26 or Older
Gender
Pregnant Women
Race/Ethnicity
Education
College Students
Employment
Geographic Area
Criminal Justice Populations
Frequency of Use
Association with Cigarette and Alcohol Use
Driving Under the Influence of Illicit Drugs
Source of Prescription Drugs

3. Alcohol Use
3.1. Alcohol Use among Persons Aged 12 or Older
Age
Gender
Pregnant Women
Race/Ethnicity
Education
College Students
Employment
Geographic Area
Association with Illicit Drug and Tobacco Use
Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol
3.2. Underage Alcohol Use

4. Tobacco Use
Age
Gender
Pregnant Women
Race/Ethnicity
Education
College Students
Employment
Geographic Area
Association with Illicit Drug and Alcohol Use
Frequency of Cigarette Use

5. Initiation of Substance Use
Initiation of Illicit Drug Use
Comparison, by Drug
Marijuana
Cocaine
Heroin
Hallucinogens
Inhalants
Psychotherapeutics
Alcohol
Tobacco

6. Youth Prevention-Related Measures
Perceptions of Risk
Perceived Availability
Perceived Parental Disapproval of Substance Use
Feelings about Peer Substance Use
Fighting and Delinquent Behavior
Religious Beliefs and Participation in Activities
Exposure to Substance Use Prevention Messages and Programs
Parental Involvement

7. Substance Dependence, Abuse, and Treatment
7.1. Substance Dependence or Abuse
Age at First Use
Age
Gender
Race/Ethnicity
Education/Employment
Criminal Justice Populations
Geographic Area
7.2. Past Year Treatment for a Substance Use Problem
7.3. Need for and Receipt of Specialty Treatment
Illicit Drug or Alcohol Use Treatment and Treatment Need
Illicit Drug Use Treatment and Treatment Need
Alcohol Use Treatment and Treatment Need

8. Discussion of Trends in Substance Use among Youths and Young Adults
Youths
Young Adults
Summary

Appendix: List of Contributors

Volume II: Technical Appendices and Selected Prevalence Tables (under separate cover)

A. Description of the Survey
B. Statistical Methods and Measurement
C. Key Definitions, 2009
D. Other Sources of Data
E. References
F. Sample Size and Population Tables
G. Selected Prevalence Tables
H. List of Contributors

Highlights

This report presents the first information from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), an annual survey sponsored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The survey is the primary source of information on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco in the civilian, noninstitutionalized population of the United States aged 12 years old or older. The survey interviews approximately 67,500 persons each year. Unless otherwise noted, all comparisons in this report described using terms such as "increased," "decreased," or "more than" are statistically significant at the .05 level.

Illicit Drug Use

Alcohol Use

Tobacco Use

Initiation of Substance Use (Incidence, or First-Time Use) within the Past 12 Months

Youth Prevention-Related Measures

Substance Dependence, Abuse, and Treatment

1. Introduction

This report presents a first look at results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), an annual survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population of the United States aged 12 years old or older. The report presents national estimates of rates of use, numbers of users, and other measures related to illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco products. The report focuses on trends between 2008 and 2009 and from 2002 to 2009, as well as differences across population subgroups in 2009. Estimates from NSDUH for States and areas within States will be presented in separate reports. NSDUH estimates related to mental health, which have been included in national findings reports in prior years, are not included in this 2009 report. A separate report focusing on 2009 mental health data, including co-occurring mental and substance use disorders, will be published later in 2010.

1.1. Summary of NSDUH

NSDUH is the primary source of statistical information on the use of illegal drugs, alcohol, and tobacco by the U.S. civilian, noninstitutionalized population aged 12 or older. Conducted by the Federal Government since 1971, the survey collects data by administering questionnaires to a representative sample of the population through face-to-face interviews at the respondent's place of residence. The survey is sponsored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and is planned and managed by SAMHSA's Office of Applied Studies (OAS). Data collection and analysis are conducted under contract with RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.1 This section briefly describes the survey methodology; a more complete description is provided in Appendix A.

NSDUH collects information from residents of households and noninstitutional group quarters (e.g., shelters, rooming houses, dormitories) and from civilians living on military bases. The survey excludes homeless persons who do not use shelters, military personnel on active duty, and residents of institutional group quarters, such as jails and hospitals. Appendix D describes surveys that cover populations outside the NSDUH target population.

From 1971 through 1998, the survey employed paper and pencil data collection. Since 1999, the NSDUH interview has been carried out using computer-assisted interviewing (CAI). Most of the questions are administered with audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI). ACASI is designed to provide the respondent with a highly private and confidential mode for responding to questions in order to increase the level of honest reporting of illicit drug use and other sensitive behaviors. Less sensitive items are administered by interviewers using computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI).

The 2009 NSDUH employed a State-based design with an independent, multistage area probability sample within each State and the District of Columbia. The eight States with the largest population (which together account for about half of the total U.S. population aged 12 or older) were designated as large sample States (California, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas) and had a sample size of about 3,600 each. For the remaining 42 States and the District of Columbia, the sample size was about 900 per State. The design oversampled youths and young adults, so that each State's sample was approximately equally distributed among three age groups: 12 to 17 years, 18 to 25 years, and 26 years or older.

Nationally, screening was completed at 143,565 addresses, and 68,700 completed interviews were obtained. The survey was conducted from January through December 2009. Weighted response rates for household screening and for interviewing were 88.8 and 75.7 percent, respectively. See Appendix B for more information on NSDUH response rates.

1.2. Limitations on Trend Measurement

Because of the shift in interviewing method in 1999, the estimates from the pre-1999 surveys are not comparable with estimates from the current CAI-based surveys. Although the design of the 2002 through 2009 NSDUHs is similar to the design of the 1999 through 2001 surveys, there are also important methodological differences that affect the comparability of the 2002 to 2009 estimates with estimates from prior surveys. The most important change was the incentive payment started in 2002 and continuing in subsequent surveys. Each NSDUH respondent completing the interview is given $30. Also, the name of the survey was changed in 2002, from the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA) to the current name. Improved data collection quality control procedures were introduced in the survey starting in 2001, and updated population data from the 2000 decennial census were incorporated into the sample weights starting with the 2002 estimates. Analyses of the effects of these factors on NSDUH estimates have shown that 2002 and later data should not be compared with 2001 and earlier data from the survey series to assess changes over time. Appendix C of the 2004 NSDUH report on national findings discusses this in more detail (see OAS, 2005).

Because of changes in the questionnaire, estimates for methamphetamine, stimulants, and psychotherapeutics in this report should not be compared with corresponding estimates in OAS reports for data years prior to 2007. Estimates for 2002 to 2006 for these drug categories in this report, as well as in the 2007 and 2008 reports, incorporate statistical adjustments to enable year-to-year comparisons to be made over the period from 2002 to 2009.

1.3. Format of Report and Explanation of Tables

This report has separate chapters that discuss the national findings on six topics: use of illicit drugs; use of alcohol; use of tobacco products; initiation of substance use; prevention-related issues; and substance dependence, abuse, and treatment. A final chapter summarizes the results and discusses key findings in relation to other research and survey results. Technical appendices presented in Volume II of this report describe the survey (Appendix A), provide technical details on the statistical methods and measurement (Appendix B), offer key NSDUH definitions (Appendix C), discuss other sources of related data (Appendix D), list the references cited in the report (Appendix E), and present selected tabulations of estimates (Appendices F and G). A list of contributors to the production of this report also is provided (Appendix H).

Tables, text, and figures present prevalence measures for the population in terms of both the number of persons and the percentage of the population. Substance use tables show prevalence estimates by lifetime (i.e., ever used), past year, and past month use. Analyses focus primarily on past month use, which also is referred to as "current use." Tables and figures in which estimates are presented by year have footnotes indicating whether the 2009 estimates are significantly different from 2008 or earlier estimates. In addition, most percentages in this report are presented to the nearest tenth of a percent. Therefore, some estimates that are significantly different from one another may nevertheless round to the same value. In some tables and figures, estimates are presented based on data combined from two or more survey years to increase precision of the estimates; those estimates are annual averages based on multiple years of data.

Statistical tests have been conducted for all statements appearing in the text of the report that compare estimates between years or subgroups of the population. Unless explicitly stated that a difference is not statistically significant, all statements that describe differences are significant at the .05 level. Statistically significant differences are described using terms such as "higher," "lower," "increased," and "decreased." Statements that use terms such as "similar," "no difference," "same," or "remained steady" to describe the relationship between estimates denote that a difference is not statistically significant. In addition, a set of estimates for survey years or population subgroups may be presented without a statement of comparison, in which case a statistically significant difference between these estimates is not implied and testing was not conducted.

All estimates presented in the report have met the criteria for statistical reliability (see Section B.2.2 in Appendix B). Estimates that do not meet these criteria are suppressed and do not appear in tables, figures, or text. Subgroups with suppressed estimates are not included in statistical tests of comparisons. For example, a statement that "whites had the highest prevalence" means that the rate among whites was higher than the rate among all nonsuppressed racial/ethnic subgroups, but not necessarily higher than the rate among a subgroup for which the estimate was suppressed.

Data are presented for racial/ethnic groups based on current guidelines for collecting and reporting race and ethnicity data (Office of Management and Budget [OMB], 1997). Because respondents were allowed to choose more than one racial group, a "two or more races" category is presented that includes persons who reported more than one category among the basic groups listed in the survey question (white, black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, Other Pacific Islander, Asian, Other). Respondents choosing both Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander but no other categories mentioned above are classified in the combined "Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander" category instead of the "two or more race" category. It should be noted that, except for the "Hispanic or Latino" group, the racial/ethnic groups discussed in this report include only non-Hispanics. The category "Hispanic or Latino" includes Hispanics of any race.

Data also are presented for four U.S. geographic regions and nine geographic divisions within these regions. These regions and divisions, defined by the U.S. Census Bureau, consist of the following groups of States:

Northeast Region - New England Division: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont; Middle Atlantic Division: New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania.

Midwest Region - East North Central Division: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin; West North Central Division: Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota.

South Region - South Atlantic Division: Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia; East South Central Division: Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee; West South Central Division: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas.

West Region - Mountain Division: Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming; Pacific Division: Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington.

Geographic comparisons also are made based on county type, a variable that reflects different levels of urbanicity and metropolitan area inclusion of counties, based on metropolitan area definitions issued by the OMB in June 2003 (OMB, 2003). For this purpose, counties are grouped based on the 2003 rural-urban continuum codes. These codes were originally developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Butler & Beale, 1994). Each county is either inside or outside a metropolitan statistical area (MSA), as defined by the OMB.

Large metropolitan areas have a population of 1 million or more. Small metropolitan areas have a population of fewer than 1 million. Small metropolitan areas are further classified based on whether they have a population of 250,000 or more. Nonmetropolitan areas are outside of MSAs. Counties in nonmetropolitan areas are further classified based on the number of people in the county who live in an urbanized area, as defined by the Census Bureau at the subcounty level. "Urbanized" counties have a population of 20,000 or more in urbanized areas, "less urbanized" counties have at least 2,500 but fewer than 20,000 population in urbanized areas, and "completely rural" counties have populations of fewer than 2,500 in urbanized areas.

1.4. Other NSDUH Reports and Data

Other reports focusing on specific topics of interest will be produced using the 2009 NSDUH data and made available on SAMHSA's Web site. In particular, data on mental health will be discussed in a separate report to be released later this year: Results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Mental Health Findings. The report will address overall mental illness (i.e., any mental disorder), serious mental illness, major depressive episode, and suicide-related measures. Treatment for mental health problems and the co-occurrence of substance use disorders also will be included. A report on State-level estimates for substance use and mental health for 2008-2009 will be available in early 2011.

A comprehensive set of tables, referred to as "detailed tables," is available through the Internet at http://www.oas.samhsa.gov. The tables are organized into sections based primarily on the topic. Most tables are provided in several parts, showing population estimates (e.g., numbers of drug users), rates (e.g., percentages of population using drugs), and standard errors of all nonsuppressed estimates. A small subset of these detailed tables has been selected for inclusion in Appendices F and G of this report. The appendix tables can be mapped back to the detailed tables by using the table number in parentheses in the upper left corner of each table (e.g., Table G.1 in Appendix G is Table 7.1A in the detailed tables). Additional methodological information on NSDUH, including the questionnaire, is available electronically at the same Web address.

Brief descriptive reports and in-depth analytic reports focusing on specific issues or population groups also are produced by OAS. A complete listing of previously published reports from NSDUH and other data sources is available from OAS. Most of these reports also are available through the Internet (http://www.oas.samhsa.gov). In addition, OAS makes public use data files available to researchers through the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive (SAMHDA, 2010) at http://www.datafiles.samhsa.gov. Currently, files are available from the 1979 to 2008 surveys.2 The 2009 NSDUH public use file will be available by the end of 2010.

2. Illicit Drug Use

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) obtains information on nine categories of illicit drug use: use of marijuana, cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens, and inhalants; and the nonmedical use of prescription-type pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. In these categories, hashish is included with marijuana, and crack is considered a form of cocaine. Several drugs are grouped under the hallucinogens category, including LSD, PCP, peyote, mescaline, psilocybin mushrooms, and "Ecstasy" (MDMA). Inhalants include a variety of substances, such as nitrous oxide, amyl nitrite, cleaning fluids, gasoline, spray paint, other aerosol sprays, and glue. Respondents are asked to report use of inhalants to get high but not to report times when they accidentally inhaled a substance.

The four categories of prescription-type drugs (pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives) cover numerous medications that currently are or have been available by prescription. They also include drugs within these groupings that originally were prescription medications but currently may be manufactured and distributed illegally, such as methamphetamine, which is included under stimulants. Respondents are asked to report only "nonmedical" use of these drugs, defined as use without a prescription of the individual's own or simply for the experience or feeling the drugs caused. Use of over-the-counter drugs and legitimate use of prescription drugs are not included. NSDUH reports combine the four prescription-type drug groups into a category referred to as "psychotherapeutics."

Estimates of "illicit drug use" reported from NSDUH reflect the use of any of the nine drug categories listed above. Use of alcohol and tobacco products, while illegal for youths, is not included in these estimates, but is discussed in Chapters 3 and 4.

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 2.1 Past Month Illicit Drug Use among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2009

Figure 2.1

1 Illicit Drugs include marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or prescription-type psychotherapeutics used nonmedically.

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 2.2 Past Month Use of Selected Illicit Drugs among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2002-2009

Figure 2.2

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 2.3 Past Month Nonmedical Use of Types of Psychotherapeutic Drugs among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2002-2009

Figure 2.3

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Age

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 2.4 Past Month Illicit Drug Use among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Age: 2008 and 2009

Figure 2.4

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 2.5 Past Month Illicit Drug Use among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Age: 2002-2009

Figure 2.5

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Youths Aged 12 to 17

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 2.6 Past Month Use of Selected Illicit Drugs among Youths Aged 12 to 17: 2002-2009

Figure 2.6

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Young Adults Aged 18 to 25

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 2.7 Past Month Use of Selected Illicit Drugs among Young Adults Aged 18 to 25: 2002-2009

Figure 2.7

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Adults Aged 26 or Older

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 2.8 Past Month Illicit Drug Use among Adults Aged 50 to 59: 2002-2009

Figure 2.8

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Gender

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 2.9 Past Month Marijuana Use among Youths Aged 12 to 17, by Gender: 2002-2009

Figure 2.9

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Pregnant Women

Race/Ethnicity

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 2.10 Past Month Illicit Drug Use among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Race/Ethnicity: 2009

Figure 2.10

Note: Due to low precision, estimates for Native Hawaiians or Other Pacific Islanders are not shown.

Education

College Students

Employment

Below are two bar graphs. Click here for the text describing these graphs.

Figure 2.11 Past Month Illicit Drug Use among Persons Aged 18 or Older, by Employment Status: 2008 and 2009

Figure 2.11

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.
1 The Other Employment category includes retired persons, disabled persons, homemakers, students, or other persons not in the labor force.

Geographic Area

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 2.12 Past Month Illicit Drug Use among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by County Type: 2009

Figure 2.12

Criminal Justice Populations

Frequency of Use

Association with Cigarette and Alcohol Use

Driving Under the Influence of Illicit Drugs

Source of Prescription Drugs

3. Alcohol Use

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) includes questions about the recency and frequency of consumption of alcoholic beverages, such as beer, wine, whiskey, brandy, and mixed drinks. An extensive list of examples of the kinds of beverages covered is given to respondents prior to the question administration. A "drink" is defined as a can or bottle of beer, a glass of wine or a wine cooler, a shot of liquor, or a mixed drink with liquor in it. Times when the respondent only had a sip or two from a drink are not considered to be consumption. For this report, estimates for the prevalence of alcohol use are reported primarily at three levels defined for both males and females and for all ages as follows:

These levels are not mutually exclusive categories of use; heavy use is included in estimates of binge and current use, and binge use is included in estimates of current use.

This chapter is divided into two main sections. Section 3.1 describes trends and patterns of alcohol use among the population aged 12 or older. Section 3.2 is concerned particularly with the use of alcohol by persons aged 12 to 20. These persons are under the legal drinking age in all 50 States and the District of Columbia.

3.1. Alcohol Use among Persons Aged 12 or Older

Age

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 3.1 Current, Binge, and Heavy Alcohol Use among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Age: 2009

Figure 3.1

Gender

Pregnant Women

Race/Ethnicity

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 3.2 Current, Binge, and Heavy Alcohol Use among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Race/Ethnicity: 2009

Figure 3.2

Note: Due to low precision, estimates for Native Hawaiians or Other Pacific Islanders are not shown.

Education

College Students

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 3.3 Heavy Alcohol Use among Adults Aged 18 to 22, by College Enrollment: 2002-2009

Figure 3.3

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Employment

Geographic Area

Association with Illicit Drug and Tobacco Use

Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 3.4 Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2002-2009

Figure 3.4

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 3.5 Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol in the Past Year among Persons Aged 16 or Older, by Age: 2009

Figure 3.5

3.2. Underage Alcohol Use

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 3.6 Current Alcohol Use among Persons Aged 12 to 20, by Age: 2002-2009

Figure 3.6

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 3.7 Current, Binge, and Heavy Alcohol Use among Persons Aged 12 to 20, by Gender: 2009

Figure 3.7

4. Tobacco Use

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) includes a series of questions about the use of tobacco products, including cigarettes, chewing tobacco, snuff, cigars, and pipe tobacco. Cigarette use is defined as smoking "part or all of a cigarette." For analytic purposes, data for chewing tobacco and snuff are combined as "smokeless tobacco."

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 4.1 Past Month Tobacco Use among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2002-2009

Figure 4.1

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Age

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 4.2 Past Month Tobacco Use among Youths Aged 12 to 17: 2002-2009

Figure 4.2

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 4.3 Past Month Cigarette Use among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Age: 2009

Figure 4.3

Gender

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 4.4 Past Month Cigarette Use among Youths Aged 12 to 17, by Gender: 2002-2009

Figure 4.4

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Pregnant Women

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 4.5 Past Month Cigarette Use among Women Aged 15 to 44, by Pregnancy Status: Combined Years 2002-2003 to 2008-2009

Figure 4.5

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2008-2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Race/Ethnicity

Education

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 4.6 Past Month Tobacco Use among Adults Aged 18 or Older, by Education: 2009

Figure 4.6

College Students

Employment

Geographic Area

Association with Illicit Drug and Alcohol Use

Frequency of Cigarette Use

5. Initiation of Substance Use

Information on substance use initiation, also known as incidence or first-time use, is important for policymakers and researchers. Measures of initiation are often leading indicators of emerging patterns of substance use. They provide valuable information that can be used to assess the effectiveness of current prevention programs and to focus prevention efforts.

With its large sample size and oversampling of youths aged 12 to 17 and young adults aged 18 to 25, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) provides a variety of estimates related to initiation of substance use (illicit drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol) based on reported age and on year and month at first use. This chapter presents estimates of initiation occurring in the 12 months prior to the interview date. Individuals who initiated use within the past 12 months are referred to as recent or past year initiates. One caveat of this approach is that because the survey interviews persons aged 12 or older and asks about the past 12 months, the initiation estimates will represent some, but not all, of the initiation at age 11 and no initiation occurring at age 10 or younger. This underestimation problem primarily affects estimates of initiation for cigarettes, alcohol, and inhalants because they tend to be initiated at a younger age than other substances. See Section B.4.1 in Appendix B for further discussion of the methods and bias in initiation estimates.

This chapter includes estimates of the number and rate of past year initiation of illicit drug, cigarette, and alcohol use among the total population aged 12 or older and by age and gender categories from the 2002 to 2009 NSDUHs. Also included are initiation estimates that pertain to persons at risk for initiation (i.e., those who had never used as of 12 months prior to the interview date). Some analyses are based on the ages at the time of interview, and others focus on the age at the time of first substance use. Readers need to be aware of these alternative estimation approaches when interpreting NSDUH incidence estimates and pay close attention to the approach used in each situation. Titles and notes on figures and associated detailed tables document which method applies.

For trend measurement, initiation estimates for each year (2002 to 2009) are produced independently based on the data from the survey conducted that year. It should be mentioned that trend estimates of incidence based on long recall periods have not been considered because of concerns about their validity (Gfroerer, Hughes, Chromy, Heller, & Packer, 2004).

Regarding the age at first use estimates, means, as measures of central tendency, are heavily influenced by the presence of extreme values in the data. Thus, for the purposes of this report and unless specified otherwise, the mean age at initiation pertains to persons aged 12 to 49. This constraint was implemented so that the mean age estimates reported would not be influenced by those few respondents who were past year initiates at age 50 or older. Note that this constraint only affects estimates of mean age at initiation; other estimates in this chapter, including the number and prevalence of past year initiates, are among all persons aged 12 or older.

Another important consideration in examining incidence estimates across different drug categories is that substance users typically initiate use of different substances at different times in their lives. Thus, the estimates for past year initiation of first specific illicit drugs cannot be added to obtain the total number of specific illicit drug initiates because some of the initiates previously had used other drugs. The first illicit drug initiation estimate only includes the past year initiation of specific drug use that was not preceded by use of other drugs. For example, a respondent who reported initiating marijuana use in the past 12 months is counted as a marijuana initiate. The same respondent also can be counted as an illicit drug initiate with marijuana as the first drug only if his or her marijuana use initiation was not preceded by use of any other drug (cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, or sedatives). To say it differently, the first illicit drug initiation estimate only takes into account the first drug initiated. To help clarify this aspect of the incidence data, additional analyses have been generated to identify which specific illicit drug was used at the time of first use of any illicit drug. Furthermore, the overall illicit drug use initiation estimates in this chapter are based on data only from the core section of the questionnaire and do not take account of data from new items on the initiation of methamphetamine use that were added to the noncore section beginning in 2007. See Section B.4.8 in Appendix B in the 2008 national findings report (OAS, 2009) for details.

Initiation of Illicit Drug Use

Below is a pie graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 5.1 First Specific Drug Associated with Initiation of Illicit Drug Use among Past Year Illicit Drug Initiates Aged 12 or Older: 2009

Figure 5.1

Note: The percentages do not add to 100 percent due to rounding or because a small number of respondents initiated multiple drugs on the same day. The first specific drug refers to the one that was used on the occasion of first-time use of any illicit drug.

Comparison, by Drug

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 5.2 Past Year Initiates of Specific Illicit Drugs among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2009

Figure 5.2

Note: The specific drug refers to the one that was used for the first time, regardless of whether it was the first drug used or not.

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 5.3 Mean Age at First Use for Specific Illicit Drugs among Past Year Initiates Aged 12 to 49: 2009

Figure 5.3

Marijuana

Below are two bar graphs. Click here for the text describing these graphs.

Figure 5.4 Past Year Marijuana Initiates among Persons Aged 12 or Older and Mean Age at First Use of Marijuana among Past Year Marijuana Initiates Aged 12 to 49: 2002-2009

Figure 5.4

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.
1 Mean-age-at-first-use estimates are for recent initiates aged 12 to 49.

Cocaine

Heroin

Hallucinogens

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 5.5 Past Year Hallucinogen Initiates among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2002-2009

Figure 5.5

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Inhalants

Psychotherapeutics

Below are two bar graphs. Click here for the text describing these graphs.

Figure 5.6 Past Year Methamphetamine Initiates among Persons Aged 12 or Older and Mean Age at First Use of Methamphetamine among Past Year Methamphetamine Initiates Aged 12 to 49: 2002-2009

Figure 5.6

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.
1 Mean-age-at-first-use estimates are for recent initiates aged 12 to 49.

Alcohol

Tobacco

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 5.7 Past Year Cigarette Initiates among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Age at First Use: 2002-2009

Figure 5.7

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 5.8 Past Year Cigarette Initiation among Youths Aged 12 to 17 Who Had Never Smoked Prior to the Past Year, by Gender: 2002-2009

Figure 5.8

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

6. Youth Prevention-Related Measures

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) includes questions for youths aged 12 to 17 about a number of risk and protective factors that may affect the likelihood that they will engage in substance use. Risk factors are individual characteristics and environmental influences associated with an increased vulnerability to the initiation, continuation, or escalation of substance use. Protective factors include individual resilience and other circumstances that are associated with a reduction in the likelihood of substance use. Risk and protective factors include variables that operate at different stages of development and reflect different domains of influence, including the individual, family, peer, school, community, and societal levels (Hawkins, Catalano, & Miller, 1992; Robertson, David, & Rao, 2003). Interventions to prevent substance use generally are designed to ameliorate the influence of risk factors and enhance the effectiveness of protective factors.

This chapter presents findings for youth prevention-related measures collected in the 2009 NSDUH and compares these with findings from previous years. Included are measures of perceived risk from substance use (cigarettes, alcohol, and illicit drugs), perceived availability of substances, being approached by someone selling drugs, perceived parental disapproval of youth substance use, feelings about peer substance use, involvement in fighting and delinquent behavior, participation in religious and other activities, exposure to substance use prevention messages and programs, and parental involvement.

In this chapter, rates of substance use are compared for persons responding differently to questions reflecting risk or protective factors, such as the perceived risk of harm from using a substance. Because the NSDUH data for an individual are collected at only one point in time, it is not possible to determine causal connections from these data. However, a number of research studies of youths have shown that reducing risk factors and increasing protective factors can reduce rates of substance use (Botvin, Botvin, & Ruchlin, 1998). This report shows that marijuana, cigarette, and alcohol past month use among youths aged 12 to 17 decreased between 2002 and 2009, yet corresponding changes in individual risk and protective factors for the same period may or may not have occurred. There can be many reasons for this, such as the lack of or a weak causal connection, a lagged relationship between the occurrence of a risk factor and the change in drug use behavior, or that individual use is typically the result of multiple simultaneous risk factors rather than a single factor (Newcomb, Maddahian, & Bentler, 1986).

Perceptions of Risk

One factor that can influence whether youths will use tobacco, alcohol, or illicit drugs is the extent to which youths believe these substances might cause them harm. NSDUH respondents were asked how much they thought people risk harming themselves physically and in other ways when they use various substances in certain amounts or frequencies. Response choices for these items were "great risk," "moderate risk," "slight risk," or "no risk."

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 6.1 Past Month Binge Drinking and Marijuana Use among Youths Aged 12 to 17, by Perceptions of Risk: 2009

Figure 6.1

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 6.2 Perceived Great Risk of Cigarette and Alcohol Use among Youths Aged 12 to 17: 2002-2009

Figure 6.2

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 6.3 Perceived Great Risk of Marijuana Use among Youths Aged 12 to 17: 2002-2009

Figure 6.3

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 6.4 Perceived Great Risk of Use of Selected Illicit Drugs among Youths Aged 12 to 17: 2002-2009

Figure 6.4

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Perceived Availability

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 6.5 Perceived Availability of Selected Illicit Drugs among Youths Aged 12 to 17: 2002-2009

Figure 6.5

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 6.6 Approached in the Past Month by Someone Selling Drugs among Youths Aged 12 to 17: 2002-2009

Figure 6.6

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Perceived Parental Disapproval of Substance Use

Feelings about Peer Substance Use

Fighting and Delinquent Behavior

Religious Beliefs and Participation in Activities

Exposure to Substance Use Prevention Messages and Programs

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 6.7 Exposure to Substance Use Prevention Messages and Programs among Youths Aged 12 to 17: 2002-2009

Figure 6.7

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.
1 Estimates are from youths aged 12 to 17 who were enrolled in school in the past year.

Parental Involvement

7. Substance Dependence, Abuse, and Treatment

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) includes a series of questions to assess the prevalence of substance use disorders (i.e., dependence on or abuse of a substance) in the past 12 months. Substances include alcohol and illicit drugs, such as marijuana, cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, and the nonmedical use of prescription-type psychotherapeutic drugs. These questions are used to classify persons as dependent on or abusing specific substances based on criteria specified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1994).

The questions related to dependence ask about health and emotional problems associated with substance use, unsuccessful attempts to cut down on use, tolerance, withdrawal, reducing other activities to use substances, spending a lot of time engaging in activities related to substance use, or using the substance in greater quantities or for a longer time than intended. The questions on abuse ask about problems at work, home, and school; problems with family or friends; physical danger; and trouble with the law due to substance use. Dependence is considered to be a more severe substance use problem than abuse because it involves the psychological and physiological effects of tolerance and withdrawal. Although individuals may meet the criteria specified here for both dependence and abuse, persons meeting the criteria for both are classified as having dependence, but not abuse. Persons defined with abuse in this report do not meet the criteria for dependence.

This chapter provides estimates of the prevalence and patterns of substance use disorders occurring in the past year from the 2009 NSDUH and compares these estimates against the results from the 2002 through 2008 surveys. It also provides estimates of the prevalence and patterns of the receipt of treatment in the past year for problems related to substance use. This chapter concludes with a discussion of the need for and the receipt of treatment at specialty facilities for problems associated with substance use.

7.1. Substance Dependence or Abuse

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 7.1 Substance Dependence or Abuse in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2002-2009

Figure 7.1

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 7.2 Dependence on or Abuse of Specific Illicit Drugs in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2009

Figure 7.2

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 7.3 Dependence on or Abuse of Illicit Drugs, Marijuana, Cocaine, and Pain Relievers in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2002-2009

Figure 7.3

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Age at First Use

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 7.4 Alcohol Dependence or Abuse in the Past Year among Adults Aged 21 or Older, by Age at First Use of Alcohol: 2009

Figure 7.4

Age

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 7.5 Dependence on or Abuse of Alcohol and Illicit Drugs among Youths Aged 12 to 17: 2002-2009

Figure 7.5

+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Gender

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 7.6 Substance Dependence or Abuse in the Past Year, by Age and Gender: 2009

Figure 7.6

Race/Ethnicity

Education/Employment

Criminal Justice Populations

Geographic Area

7.2. Past Year Treatment for a Substance Use Problem

Estimates described in this section refer to treatment received for illicit drug or alcohol use, or for medical problems associated with the use of illicit drugs or alcohol. This includes treatment received in the past year at any location, such as a hospital (inpatient), rehabilitation facility (outpatient or inpatient), mental health center, emergency room, private doctor's office, prison or jail, or a self-help group, such as Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous. Persons could report receiving treatment at more than one location. Note that the definition of treatment in this section is different from the definition of specialty treatment described in Section 7.3. Specialty treatment only includes treatment at a hospital (inpatient), a rehabilitation facility (inpatient or outpatient), or a mental health center.

Individuals who reported receiving substance use treatment but were missing information on whether the treatment was specifically for alcohol use or illicit drug use were not counted in estimates of either illicit drug use treatment or alcohol use treatment; however, they were counted in estimates for "drug or alcohol use" treatment.

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 7.7 Locations Where Past Year Substance Use Treatment Was Received among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2009

Figure 7.7

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 7.8 Substances for Which Most Recent Treatment Was Received in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2009

Figure 7.8

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 7.9 Received Most Recent Treatment in the Past Year for the Use of Pain Relievers among Persons Aged 12 or Older: 2002-2009

Figure 7.9

7.3. Need for and Receipt of Specialty Treatment

This section discusses the need for and receipt of treatment for a substance use problem at a "specialty" treatment facility. Specialty treatment is defined as treatment received at any of the following types of facilities: hospitals (inpatient only), drug or alcohol rehabilitation facilities (inpatient or outpatient), or mental health centers. It does not include treatment at an emergency room, private doctor's office, self-help group, prison or jail, or hospital as an outpatient. An individual is defined as needing treatment for an alcohol or drug use problem if he or she met the DSM-IV (APA, 1994) diagnostic criteria for dependence on or abuse of alcohol or illicit drugs in the past 12 months or if he or she received specialty treatment for alcohol use or illicit drug use in the past 12 months.

In this section, an individual needing treatment for an illicit drug use problem is defined as receiving treatment for his or her drug use problem only if he or she reported receiving specialty treatment for drug use in the past year. Thus, an individual who needed treatment for illicit drug use but only received specialty treatment for alcohol use in the past year or who received treatment for illicit drug use only at a facility not classified as a specialty facility was not counted as receiving treatment for drug use. Similarly, an individual who needed treatment for an alcohol use problem was only counted as receiving alcohol use treatment if the treatment was received for alcohol use at a specialty treatment facility. Individuals who reported receiving specialty substance use treatment but were missing information on whether the treatment was specifically for alcohol use or drug use were not counted in estimates of specialty drug use treatment or in estimates of specialty alcohol use treatment; however, they were counted in estimates for "drug or alcohol use" treatment.

In addition to questions about symptoms of substance use problems that are used to classify respondents' need for treatment based on DSM-IV criteria, NSDUH includes questions asking respondents about their perceived need for treatment (i.e., whether they felt they needed treatment or counseling for illicit drug use or alcohol use). In this report, estimates for perceived need for treatment are only discussed for persons who were classified as needing treatment (based on DSM-IV criteria) but did not receive treatment at a specialty facility. Similarly, estimates for whether a person made an effort to get treatment are only discussed for persons who felt the need for treatment.

Illicit Drug or Alcohol Use Treatment and Treatment Need

Below is a pie graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 7.10 Past Year Perceived Need for and Effort Made to Receive Specialty Treatment among Persons Aged 12 or Older Needing But Not Receiving Treatment for Illicit Drug or Alcohol Use: 2009

Figure 7.10

Below is a bar graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 7.11 Reasons for Not Receiving Substance Use Treatment among Persons Aged 12 or Older Who Needed and Made an Effort to Get Treatment But Did Not Receive Treatment and Felt They Needed Treatment: 2006-2009 Combined

Figure 7.11

Illicit Drug Use Treatment and Treatment Need

Alcohol Use Treatment and Treatment Need

8. Discussion of Trends in Substance Use among Youths and Young Adults

This report presents findings from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Conducted since 1971 and previously named the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA), the survey underwent several methodological improvements in 2002 that have affected prevalence estimates. As a result, the 2002 through 2009 estimates are not comparable with estimates from 2001 and earlier surveys. Therefore, the primary focus of this report is on comparisons of measures of substance use across subgroups of the U.S. population in 2009, changes between 2008 and 2009, and changes between 2002 and 2009. This chapter provides an additional discussion of the findings concerning a topic of great interest—trends in substance use among youths and young adults.

An important step in the analysis and interpretation of NSDUH or any other survey data is to compare the results with those from other data sources. This can be difficult sometimes because the other surveys typically have different purposes, definitions, and designs. Research has established that surveys of substance use and other sensitive topics often produce inconsistent results because of different methods used. Thus, it is important to understand that conflicting results often reflect differing methodologies, not incorrect results. Despite this limitation, comparisons can be very useful. Consistency across surveys can confirm or support conclusions about trends and patterns of use, and inconsistent results can point to areas for further study. Further discussion of this issue is included in Appendix D, along with descriptions of methods and results from other sources of substance use data.

Unfortunately, few additional data sources are available at this time to compare with NSDUH results. One established source is Monitoring the Future (MTF), a study sponsored by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). MTF surveys students in the 8th, 10th, and 12th grades in classrooms during the spring of each year, and it also collects data by mail from a subsample of adults who had participated earlier in the study as 12th graders (Johnston, O'Malley, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2010a, 2010b). Historically, NSDUH rates of substance use among youths have been lower than those of MTF, and occasionally the two surveys have shown different trends over a short time period. Nevertheless, the two sources have shown very similar long-term trends in prevalence. NSDUH and MTF rates of substance use generally have been similar among young adults, and the two sources also have shown similar trends.

A comparison of NSDUH and MTF estimates for 2002 to 2009 is shown in Tables 8.1 and 8.2 at the end of this chapter for several substances that are defined similarly in the two surveys. For comparison purposes, MTF data on 8th and 10th graders are combined to give an age range close to 12 to 17 years, the standard youth age group for NSDUH. Appendix D provides comparisons according to MTF definitions (8th, 10th, and 12th grades). MTF follow-up data on persons aged 19 to 24 provide the closest match on age to estimates for NSDUH young adults aged 18 to 25. The NSDUH results are remarkably consistent with MTF trends for both youths and young adults, as discussed below.

Youths

Both surveys generally showed decreases between 2002 and 2009 in the percentages of youths who used marijuana, cocaine, Ecstasy, LSD, alcohol, and cigarettes in the lifetime, past year, and past month (Table 8.1). Exceptions were for the past month use of LSD in both NSDUH and MTF data and the past month use of Ecstasy in the NSDUH data. The hallucinogen trends are discussed in more detail below. Both surveys showed no decrease in the rates of past year and past month inhalant use among youths between 2002 and 2009, and only NSDUH showed a significant decrease in lifetime use.

Despite the long-term (i.e., since 2002) declines in use, both surveys showed recent shifts in these trends, particularly for the three most commonly used substances among youths: alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana. Between 2002 and 2008, both NSDUH and MTF showed a nearly 20 percent decline in current (i.e., past month) alcohol use, including statistically significant declines between 2007 and 2008. However, no significant changes occurred in either survey between 2008 and 2009 in the rates of current alcohol use (Figure 8.1). A similar result was seen for past month cigarette use. Both studies found that rates of current youth smoking declined by about 30 percent between 2002 and 2008, then remained unchanged in 2009 (Figure 8.2). Rates of past month marijuana use for both studies declined from 2002 to 2006, were similar from 2006 to 2008, then increased between 2008 and 2009 (Figure 8.3). The rate of past year Ecstasy use declined by about 50 percent from 2002 to 2005 according to both surveys. NSDUH data indicated an increase in past year Ecstasy use between 2005 and 2009, but MTF data showed no significant change in Ecstasy use over this same period.

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 8.1 Past Month Alcohol Use among Youths in NSDUH and MTF: 2002-2009

Figure 8.1

MTF = Monitoring the Future; NSDUH = National Survey on Drug Use and Health.
+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 8.2 Past Month Cigarette Use among Youths in NSDUH and MTF: 2002-2009

Figure 8.2

MTF = Monitoring the Future; NSDUH = National Survey on Drug Use and Health.
+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 8.3 Past Month Marijuana Use among Youths in NSDUH and MTF: 2002-2009

Figure 8.3

MTF = Monitoring the Future; NSDUH = National Survey on Drug Use and Health.
+ Difference between this estimate and the 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.

NSDUH and MTF data on perceived risk of harm provide an important context for these trends. The extent to which youths believe that substances might cause them harm is an important factor influencing whether or not they will use these substances. Declining levels of perceived risk among youths historically have been associated with subsequent increases in rates of use, and this association continues to be evident in the most recent data. Among youths aged 12 to 17, the percentage reporting in NSDUH that they thought there was a great risk of harm in smoking marijuana once or twice a week was 54.7 percent in 2007, 53.1 percent in 2008, and 49.3 percent in 2009. MTF data for combined 8th and 10th graders showed a similar decline in perceived harmfulness of regular marijuana use over this time period. NSDUH does not obtain data on perceived harm for Ecstasy, but MTF data showed significant declines among youths who perceived risk in using Ecstasy. For example, the percentage of 8th and 10th graders reporting great risk in occasionally using Ecstasy declined from 69.9 percent in 2004 to 56.6 percent in 2008, then declined again to 53.0 percent in 2009. NSDUH also showed a decline in youths' perceived risk in using LSD between 2002 and 2008. Although the rates of use of alcohol and cigarettes were unchanged between 2008 and 2009, NSDUH showed declines from 2008 to 2009 in youths' perceived risk of harm in having four or five drinks of alcohol nearly every day or smoking one or more packs of cigarettes per day.

NSDUH and MTF use different definitions and questioning strategies to track misuse of prescription drugs. NSDUH data showed a decline in past month nonmedical prescription drug use among youths between 2002 (4.0 percent) and 2008 (2.9 percent), with no significant change between 2008 and 2009 (3.1 percent). However, there was a significant increase in nonmedical use of prescription pain relievers between 2008 and 2009 (from 2.3 to 2.7 percent). Both MTF and NSDUH produce estimates of methamphetamine use. Both surveys showed declines in past year and past month use of methamphetamine between 2002 and 2009, with no indication of increases between 2008 and 2009, although past month methamphetamine use decreased in the MTF.

Another source of data on trends in the use of drugs among youths is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). YRBS surveys students in the 9th through 12th grades in classrooms every other year during the spring (Eaton et al., 2010). The most recent survey was completed in 2009. Generally, the YRBS has shown higher prevalence rates but similar long-term trends when compared with NSDUH and MTF. However, comparisons between YRBS and NSDUH or MTF are less straightforward because of the different periodicity (i.e., biennially instead of annually) and ages covered, the limited number of drug use questions, and smaller sample size in the YRBS. For the substances for which information on current use is collected in the YRBS, including alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, and cocaine, the YRBS trend results between 2001 and 2009 are consistent with NSDUH and MTF (CDC, 2010c; Grunbaum et al., 2002). YRBS data for the combined grades 9 through 12 showed significant decreases in past month alcohol use (47.1 percent in 2001 and 41.8 percent in 2009) and cigarette use (28.5 percent in 2001, 19.5 percent in 2009). YRBS showed a decline in past month marijuana use between 2001 (23.9 percent) and 2007 (19.7 percent), but the rate was 20.8 percent in 2009, an increase consistent with the NSDUH and MTF data, but the NSDUH and YRBS increases were not statistically significant.

Although changes in NSDUH survey methodology preclude direct comparisons of recent estimates with estimates from before 2002, it is important to put the recent trends in context by reviewing longer term trends in use. NSDUH data (prior to the design changes in 1999 and 2002) on youths aged 12 to 17 and MTF data on high school seniors have shown substantial increases in youth illicit drug use during the 1970s, reaching a peak in the late 1970s. Both surveys then showed significant declines throughout the 1980s until about 1992, when rates reached a low point. These trends were driven by the trend in marijuana use. With the start of annual data collection in NSDUH in 1991, along with the biennial YRBS and the annual 8th and 10th grade samples in MTF, trends among youths are well documented since the low point that occurred in the early 1990s. Although they employ different survey designs and cover different age groups, the three surveys are consistent in showing increasing rates of marijuana use during the early to mid-1990s, reaching a peak in the late 1990s (but lower than in the late 1970s). This peak in the late 1990s was followed by declines in use after the turn of the 21st century and a leveling in the most recent years (Figure 8.4).

Below is a line graph. Click here for the text describing this graph.

Figure 8.4 Past Month Marijuana Use among Youths in NSDUH, MTF, and YRBS: 1971-2009

Figure 8.4

MTF = Monitoring the Future; NSDUH = National Survey on Drug Use and Health;
YRBS = Youth Risk Behavior Survey.
Note: NSDUH data for youths aged 12 to 17 are not presented for 1999 to 2001 because of design changes in the survey. These design changes preclude direct comparisons of estimates from 2002 to 2009 with estimates prior to 1999.

Young Adults

Data on young adults also show similar trends in the two surveys, although not as consistent as for the youth data (Table 8.2). Potential reasons for differences from the data for youths are the relatively smaller MTF sample size for young adults and possible bias in the MTF sample due to noncoverage of school dropouts and a low overall response rate, considering nonresponse by schools, by students in the 12th grade survey, and in the follow-up mail survey.

Both surveys showed declines between 2002 and 2008 for past year and past month cigarette and marijuana use among young adults, although the decline in past month marijuana use in NSDUH was not significant. Both surveys also showed increases in past month and past year marijuana use between 2008 and 2009, and in this case the NSDUH increases were statistically significant while the MTF increases were not. Both surveys showed no significant change between 2002 and 2009 in the rate of current alcohol use among young adults. Both surveys showed declines in past year and past month cocaine use from 2003 to 2009. Significant increases in past month and past year Ecstasy use between 2007 and 2009 in the NSDUH data were consistent with MTF data; however, the MTF increases were not statistically significant.

Summary

Despite the methodological differences between MTF and NSDUH, the two surveys show remarkably similar recent trends for the most commonly used substances among youths, and longer term trends are generally parallel where comparisons can be made. This lends credence to the belief that the two are measuring the same phenomenon and reaching similar conclusions. Further evidence for these shared conclusions is provided by the findings from the YRBS. For young adults, the differences between NSDUH and MTF are slightly greater, perhaps due to greater methodological variation, yet even with this age group, the trends and patterns are consistent enough to indicate measurement of the same phenomenon.

Table 8.1 – Comparison of NSDUH and MTF Prevalence Estimates among Youths: Percentages, 2002-2009
Substance/
Time Period
NSDUH
(2002)
NSDUH
(2003)
NSDUH
(2004)
NSDUH
(2005)
NSDUH
(2006)
NSDUH
(2007)
NSDUH
(2008)
NSDUH
(2009)
MTF
(2002)
MTF
(2003)
MTF
(2004)
MTF
(2005)
MTF
(2006)
MTF
(2007)
MTF
(2008)
MTF
(2009)
-- Not available.
NOTE: NSDUH data are for youths aged 12 to 17, and MTF data are simple averages of estimates for 8th and 10th graders. MTF data for 8th and 10th graders are reported in Johnston, O'Malley, Bachman, and Schulenberg (2010a). MTF design effects used for variance estimation are reported in Johnston, O'Malley, Bachman, and Schulenberg (2009b).
a Difference between this estimate and 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.
Sources: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002-2009. University of Michigan, The Monitoring the Future Study, 2002-2009.
Marijuana                                
Lifetime 20.6a 19.6a 19.0a 17.4 17.3 16.2 16.5 17.0 29.0a 27.0a 25.7a 25.3 23.8 22.6 22.3a 24.0
Past Year 15.8a 15.0a 14.5a 13.3 13.2 12.5a 13.0 13.6 22.5a 20.5 19.7 19.4 18.5 17.5a 17.4a 19.3
Past Month 8.2a 7.9 7.6 6.8 6.7a 6.7 6.7a 7.3 13.1a 12.3a 11.2 10.9 10.4 10.0a 9.8a 11.2
Cocaine                                
Lifetime 2.7a 2.6a 2.4a 2.3a 2.2a 2.1a 1.9 1.6 4.9a 4.4a 4.4a 4.5a 4.1 4.2 3.8 3.6
Past Year 2.1a 1.8a 1.6a 1.7a 1.6a 1.5a 1.2 1.0 3.2a 2.8a 2.9a 2.9a 2.6 2.7a 2.4 2.2
Past Month 0.6a 0.6a 0.5a 0.6a 0.4a 0.4 0.4 0.3 1.4a 1.1 1.3a 1.3a 1.3a 1.1 1.0 0.9
Ecstasy                                
Lifetime 3.3a 2.4 2.1 1.6a 1.9a 1.8a 2.1 2.3 5.5a 4.3 3.6 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.4 3.9
Past Year 2.2a 1.3a 1.2a 1.0a 1.2a 1.3a 1.4 1.7 3.9a 2.6 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.5 2.3 2.5
Past Month 0.5 0.4 0.3a 0.3a 0.3 0.3a 0.4 0.5 1.6a 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0
LSD                                
Lifetime 2.7a 1.6a 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.8a 1.1 1.0 3.8a 2.8 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4
Past Year 1.3a 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4a 0.5 0.7 0.6 2.1a 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.5
Past Month 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5
Inhalants                                
Lifetime 10.5a 10.7a 11.0a 10.5a 10.1a 9.6 9.3 9.2 14.4 14.3 14.9a 15.1a 14.7 14.6 14.3 13.6
Past Year 4.4 4.5a 4.6a 4.5a 4.4a 3.9 3.9 3.9 6.8 7.1 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.5 7.4 7.1
Past Month 1.2 1.3a 1.2 1.2 1.3a 1.2 1.1 1.0 3.1 3.2 3.5a 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.0
Alcohol                                
Lifetime 43.4a 42.9a 42.0a 40.6a 40.4a 39.4a 38.3 38.1 57.0a 55.8a 54.1a 52.1a 51.0a 50.3a 48.6 47.9
Past Year 34.6a 34.3a 33.9a 33.3a 32.9a 31.8a 30.8 30.3 49.4a 48.3a 47.5a 45.3a 44.7a 44.1a 42.3 41.6
Past Month 17.6a 17.7a 17.6a 16.5a 16.6a 15.9a 14.6 14.7 27.5a 27.6a 26.9a 25.2a 25.5a 24.7a 22.4 22.7
Cigarettes                                
Lifetime 33.3a 31.0a 29.2a 26.7a 25.8a 23.7a 22.9 22.2 39.4a 35.7a 34.3a 32.4a 30.4a 28.4a 26.1 26.4
Past Year 20.3a 19.0a 18.4a 17.3a 17.0a 15.7 15.0 15.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Past Month 13.0a 12.2a 11.9a 10.8a 10.4a 9.8a 9.1 8.9 14.2a 13.5a 12.6a 12.1a 11.6a 10.6 9.6 9.8
Table 8.2 – Comparison of NSDUH and MTF Prevalence Estimates among Young Adults: Percentages, 2002-2009
Substance/
Time Period
NSDUH
(2002)
NSDUH
(2003)
NSDUH
(2004)
NSDUH
(2005)
NSDUH
(2006)
NSDUH
(2007)
NSDUH
(2008)
NSDUH
(2009)
MTF
(2002)
MTF
(2003)
MTF
(2004)
MTF
(2005)
MTF
(2006)
MTF
(2007)
MTF
(2008)
MTF
(2009)
-- Not available.
NOTE: NSDUH data shown in this table are for persons aged 18 to 25.
NOTE: MTF data shown in this table are for persons aged 19 to 24. These estimates are simple averages of modal age groups 19-20, 21-22, and 23-24 as reported in Johnston, O'Malley, and Bachman (2003) and in Johnston, O'Malley, Bachman, and Schulenberg (2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009a, 2010a).
NOTE: For the 19 to 24 age group in the MTF data, significance tests were performed assuming independent samples between years an odd number of years apart because two distinct cohorts a year apart were monitored longitudinally at 2-year intervals. Although appropriate for comparisons of 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008 estimates with 2009 estimates, this assumption results in conservative tests for comparisons of 2003, 2005, and 2007 estimates with 2009 estimates because it does not take into account covariances that are associated with repeated observations from the longitudinal samples. Estimates of covariances were not available.
a Difference between this estimate and 2009 estimate is statistically significant at the .05 level.
Sources: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002-2009. University of Michigan, The Monitoring the Future Study, 2002-2009.
Marijuana                                
Lifetime 53.8a 53.9a 52.8 52.4 52.4 50.8a 50.4a 52.2 56.1 56.4a 55.6 54.4 53.8 53.9 53.0 53.8
Past Year 29.8 28.5a 27.8a 28.0a 28.0a 27.5a 27.6a 30.6 34.2 33.0 31.6 31.4 30.9 31.0 30.9 32.1
Past Month 17.3 17.0a 16.1a 16.6a 16.3a 16.4a 16.5a 18.1 19.8 19.9 18.2 17.0 17.0 17.5 17.3 18.5
Cocaine                                
Lifetime 15.4 15.0 15.2 15.1 15.7 15.0 14.4 14.8 12.9 14.5a 14.3a 12.6 13.6 12.4 12.2 12.2
Past Year 6.7a 6.6a 6.6a 6.9a 6.9a 6.4a 5.5 5.3 6.5 7.3a 7.8a 6.9a 7.0a 6.3 6.0 5.7
Past Month 2.0a 2.2a 2.1a 2.6a 2.2a 1.7a 1.5 1.4 2.5 2.6a 2.4 2.1 2.4 1.9 1.9 1.8
Ecstasy                                
Lifetime 15.1a 14.8a 13.8a 13.7a 13.4a 12.8 12.1 12.4 16.0a 16.6a 14.9a 12.4a 11.5 9.5 10.1 9.4
Past Year 5.8a 3.7a 3.1a 3.1a 3.8a 3.5a 3.9 4.3 8.0a 5.3a 3.3 3.4 3.6 2.8 3.8 3.6
Past Month 1.1 0.7a 0.7a 0.8a 1.0 0.7a 0.9 1.1 1.6a 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.7
LSD                                
Lifetime 15.9a 14.0a 12.1a 10.5a 8.9a 7.3 6.5 6.8 13.9a 13.8a 10.4a 7.9a 6.7a 5.9 5.6 5.3
Past Year 1.8 1.1a 1.0a 1.0a 1.2a 1.1a 1.5 1.5 2.4 1.5 1.2a 1.1a 1.5 1.4a 1.9 2.1
Past Month 0.1a 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3
Inhalants                                
Lifetime 15.7a 14.9a 14.0a 13.3a 12.5a 11.3 10.4 10.7 11.7a 11.4a 10.6a 9.3 9.7a 7.5 8.4 7.7
Past Year 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.9 2.2a 1.5 2.3a 1.6 1.8 1.1 1.7 1.2
Past Month 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.8a 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.2
Alcohol                                
Lifetime 86.7 87.1a 86.2 85.7 86.5 85.2 85.6 85.8 88.4a 87.6a 87.2 87.1 87.0 86.0 86.4 85.7
Past Year 77.9 78.1 78.0 77.9 78.8 77.9 78.0 78.8 83.9a 82.3 83.1 82.8 83.2 82.8 82.5 82.0
Past Month 60.5 61.4 60.5 60.9 61.9 61.2 61.2 61.8 67.7 66.3 67.3 66.8 67.0 67.4 67.4 68.1
Cigarettes                                
Lifetime 71.2a 70.2a 68.7a 67.3a 66.6a 64.7 64.2 63.7 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Past Year 49.0a 47.6a 47.5a 47.2a 47.0a 45.1 45.0 45.2 41.8a 40.8a 41.4a 40.2a 37.1 36.2 35.4 35.0
Past Month 40.8a 40.2a 39.5a 39.0a 38.4a 36.2 35.7 35.8 31.4a 29.5a 30.2a 28.7a 26.7a 25.7a 24.3 23.5

Appendix: List of Contributors

This National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) report was prepared by the Division of Population Surveys, Office of Applied Studies (OAS), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and by RTI International (a trade name of Research Triangle Institute), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Work by RTI was performed under Contract No. 283-2004-00022.

Contributors at SAMHSA listed alphabetically, with chapter authorship noted, include Peggy Barker, Jonaki Bose, James Colliver (Chapter 2), Joseph Gfroerer (Chapters 1 and 8), Beth Han (Chapters 6 and 7), Sarra L. Hedden, Arthur Hughes, Michael Jones (Project Officer) (Chapter 4), Joel Kennet (Chapter 3), Pradip Muhuri (Chapter 5), and Dicy Painter.

Contributors and reviewers at RTI listed alphabetically include Jeremy Aldworth, Kimberly Ault, Ellen Bishop, Stephanie Bruns, Patrick Chen, James R. Chromy, Elizabeth Copello, Devon S. Cribb, David B. Cunningham, Christine Davies, Teresa R. Davis, Ralph E. Folsom, Jr., Misty Foster, Peter Frechtel, Julia Gable, Jennifer Gratton, Wafa Handley, David C. Heller, Erica Hirsch, Ilona Johnson, Rhonda Karg, Phillip S. Kott, Larry A. Kroutil, Mary Ellen Marsden, Martin Meyer, Andrew Moore, Katherine B. Morton, Scott Novak, Lisa E. Packer, Michael Pemberton, Jeremy Porter, Heather Ringeisen, Harley Rohloff, Kathryn Spagnola, Thomas G. Virag (Project Director), Jiantong (Jean) Wang, and Lauren Warren.

Also at RTI, report and Web production staff listed alphabetically include Teresa G. Bass, Cassandra M. Carter, Joyce Clay-Brooks, Kimberly Cone, Valerie Garner, Richard Hair, Andrew Jessup, Shari B. Lambert, Farrah Bullock Mann, Danny Occoquan, Diane E. Philyaw, Brenda K. Porter, Pamela Couch Prevatt, Roxanne Snaauw, Richard S. Straw, and Cheryl Velez. Final report production was provided by Christine Hager and Jane Feldman at SAMHSA.

End Notes

1 RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute.
2 See http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/SAMHDA/series/64.

Go to Top of PageGo to the Table of Contents

This page was last updated on .