Title
Health plan members' experiences: percentage of adult health plan members who reported how often their doctors communicated well.
Source(s)
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). HEDIS 2012: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. Vol. 1, narrative. Washington (DC): National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2011. various p. |
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). HEDIS 2012: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. Vol. 2, technical specifications for health plans. Washington (DC): National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2011. various p. |
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). HEDIS 2012: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. Vol. 3, specifications for survey measures. Washington (DC): National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2011. various p. |
|
Primary Measure Domain
Clinical Quality Measures: Patient Experience
Secondary Measure Domain
Does not apply to this measure
|
Description
The CAHPS Health Plan Survey 4.0H, Adult Version provides information on the experiences of commercial and Medicaid members with the health plan and gives a general indication of how well the health plan meets members' expectations. Results summarize member satisfaction through ratings, composites and question summary rates.
Seven composite scores summarize responses in key areas.
- Claims Processing (commercial only)
- Customer Service
- Getting Care Quickly
- Getting Needed Care
- How Well Doctors Communicate
- Shared Decision Making
- Plan Information on Costs (commercial only)
For this "How Well Doctors Communicate" measure, members indicate how often ("Never," "Sometimes," "Usually," or "Always") their doctors communicated well with them. The "How Well Doctors Communicate" composite measure is based on four questions in the CAHPS 4.0H Adult Questionnaire.
Rationale
The National Committee for Quality Assurance's (NCQA's) Committee on Performance Measurement (CPM) has long felt that consumer experience with health care is a critical component of quality of care, that experience affects care outcome—and that experience is itself a measure of outcome. Survey results give health plans the opportunity for continuous improvement in member care.
Evidence for Rationale
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). HEDIS 2012: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. Vol. 3, specifications for survey measures. Washington (DC): National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2011. various p. |
Primary Health Components
Health care; members' experiences; physician communication
Denominator Description
Health plan members 18 years and older who answered the "How Well Doctors Communicate" questions on the CAHPS 4.0H Adult Questionnaire (see the related "Denominator Inclusions/Exclusions" fields)
Numerator Description
The number of "Never," "Sometimes," "Usually," and "Always" responses on the "How Well Doctors Communicate" questions (see the related "Numerator Inclusions/Exclusions" field)
|
Evidence Supporting the Measure
Type of Evidence Supporting the Criterion of Quality for the Measure
- A formal consensus procedure, involving experts in relevant clinical, methodological, public health and organizational sciences
Additional Information Supporting Need for the Measure
In 2010, the average percentage of members who responded "Always" in response to how often their doctors communicated well increased by 1.5 (health maintenance organization [HMO]) and 1.8 (preferred provider organization [PPO]) percentage points for commercial plans, and by 1.6 (HMO) percentage points for Medicaid plans.
Evidence for Additional Information Supporting Need for the Measure
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). The state of health care quality 2011. Continuous improvement and the expansion of quality measurement. Washington (DC): National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2011. 199 p. |
Extent of Measure Testing
|
State of Use of the Measure
State of Use
Current routine use
Current Use
Accreditation
Decision-making by businesses about health plan purchasing
Decision-making by consumers about health plan/provider choice
External oversight/Medicaid
External oversight/State government program
Internal quality improvement
Public reporting
|
Application of the Measure in its Current Use
Measurement Setting
Managed Care Plans
Professionals Involved in Delivery of Health Services
Physicians
Least Aggregated Level of Services Delivery Addressed
Single Health Care Delivery or Public Health Organizations
Statement of Acceptable Minimum Sample Size
Specified
Target Population Age
Age greater than or equal to 18 years
Target Population Gender
Either male or female
|
National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care
National Quality Strategy Aim
Better Care
National Quality Strategy Priority
Health and Well-being of Communities Person- and Family-centered Care
|
Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Health Care Quality Report Categories
IOM Care Need
End of Life Care
Getting Better
Living with Illness
Staying Healthy
IOM Domain
Patient-centeredness
|
Data Collection for the Measure
Denominator Sampling Frame
Enrollees or beneficiaries
Denominator (Index) Event or Characteristic
Patient/Individual (Consumer) Characteristic
Denominator Time Window
Time window brackets index event
Denominator Inclusions/Exclusions
Inclusions
Health plan members 18 years and older who answered the "How Well Doctors Communicate" questions on the CAHPS 4.0H Adult Questionnaire. Include nonresponses*.
*Nonresponses:
- Refusal
- After maximum attempts
- Bad addresses
- Bad addresses and nonworking/unlisted phone number or member is unknown at the dialed phone number
Exclusions
- Deceased
- Does not meet eligible population** criteria
- Language barrier
- Mentally or physically incapacitated
**Eligible Population: Health plan members 18 years and older as of December 31 of the measurement year, who have been continuously enrolled in the health plan during the measurement year (commercial) or the last 6 months of the measurement year (Medicaid) and currently enrolled at the time the survey is completed.
Allowable Gap: No more than one gap in enrollment of up to 45 days during the measurement year. To determine continuous enrollment for a Medicaid member for whom enrollment is verified monthly, the member may not have had more than a 1-month gap in coverage.
Exclusions/Exceptions
Does not apply to this measure
Numerator Inclusions/Exclusions
Inclusions
The number of "Never," "Sometimes," "Usually," and "Always" responses on the "How Well Doctors Communicate" questions
From the responses, a composite mean and variance score are calculated. A higher composite mean is associated with better quality. Additionally, composite global proportions and variances are calculated as well as item-specific question summary rates for each composite question.
Note: A questionnaire must have the final disposition code of "Complete and Valid Survey" for inclusion in the survey results calculations.
Refer to the original measure documentation for details.
Exclusions
Unspecified
Numerator Search Strategy
Fixed time period or point in time
Data Source
Administrative clinical data
Patient/Individual survey
Type of Health State
Does not apply to this measure
Instruments Used and/or Associated with the Measure
CAHPS® Health Plan Survey 4.0H, Adult Questionnaire
|
Computation of the Measure
Measure Specifies Disaggregation
Does not apply to this measure
Scoring
Composite/Scale
Mean/Median
Rate/Proportion
Interpretation of Score
Desired value is a higher score
Allowance for Patient or Population Factors
Analysis by subgroup (stratification by individual factors, geographic factors, etc.)
Description of Allowance for Patient or Population Factors
This measure requires that results are reported separately for the commercial and Medicaid product lines.
Standard of Comparison
External comparison at a point in, or interval of, time
External comparison of time trends
Internal time comparison
|
Original Title
How well doctors communicate.
Submitter
National Committee for Quality Assurance - Health Care Accreditation Organization
Developer
National Committee for Quality Assurance - Health Care Accreditation Organization
Composition of the Group that Developed the Measure
National Committee for Quality Assurance's (NCQA's) Measurement Advisory Panels (MAPs) are composed of clinical and research experts with an understanding of quality performance measurement in the particular clinical content areas.
Financial Disclosures/Other Potential Conflicts of Interest
In order to fulfill National Committee for Quality Assurance's (NCQA's) mission and vision of improving health care quality through measurement, transparency and accountability, all participants in NCQA's expert panels are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest prior to their participation. The goal of this Conflict Policy is to ensure that decisions which impact development of NCQA's products and services are made as objectively as possible, without improper bias or influence.
Endorser
National Quality Forum
Adaptation
This measure was adapted from the following source:
- CAHPS 4.0 Health Plan Survey (Adult Questionnaire)
Date of Most Current Version in NQMC
2011 Jul
Date of Next Anticipated Revision
Measure Status
Please note: This measure has been updated. The National Quality Measures Clearinghouse is working to update this summary.
Source(s)
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). HEDIS 2012: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. Vol. 1, narrative. Washington (DC): National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2011. various p. |
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). HEDIS 2012: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. Vol. 2, technical specifications for health plans. Washington (DC): National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2011. various p. |
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). HEDIS 2012: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. Vol. 3, specifications for survey measures. Washington (DC): National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2011. various p. |
Measure Availability
The individual measure, "How Well Doctors Communicate," is published in "HEDIS® 2012. Healthcare Effectiveness Data & Information Set. Vol. 2, Technical Specifications for Health Plans."
For more information, contact the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) at 1100 13th Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005; Telephone: 202-955-3500; Fax: 202-955-3599; Web site: www.ncqa.org .
Companion Documents
The following is available:
- National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). The state of health care quality 2011. Continuous improvement and the expansion of quality measurement. Washington (DC): National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); 2011. 199 p.
For more information, contact the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) at 1100 13th Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005; Telephone: 202-955-3500; Fax: 202-955-3599; Web site: www.ncqa.org .
NQMC Status
This NQMC summary was completed by ECRI on March 28, 2007. The information was not verified by the measure developer. This NQMC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on March 17, 2008. The information was verified by the measure developer on April 24, 2008. This NQMC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on February 6, 2009. The information was verified by the measure developer on May 12, 2009. This NQMC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on April 30, 2010, August 4, 2011, and again on November 2, 2012.
Copyright Statement
This NQMC summary is based on the original measure, which is subject to the measure developer's copyright restrictions.
For detailed specifications regarding the National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA) measures, refer to HEDIS Volume 2: Technical Specifications for Health Plans, available from the NCQA Web site at www.ncqa.org .
|
NQMC Disclaimer
The National Quality Measures Clearinghouseâ„¢ (NQMC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the measures represented on this site. Read full disclaimer...The National Quality Measures Clearinghouseâ„¢ (NQMC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the measures represented on this site. All measures summarized by NQMC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public and private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, individuals, and similar entities. Measures represented on the NQMC Web site are submitted by measure developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NQMC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/about/inclusion-criteria.aspx . NQMC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or its reliability and/or validity of the quality measures and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of measures represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NQMC, AHRQ, or its contractor, ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of measures in NQMC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes. Readers with questions regarding measure content are directed to contact the measure developer. Hide...
|