Skip Navigation
Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
 
Slide Tray
0 slides

Return to Slide Library

Slides

Add Search Results to Slide Tray Search:

"blood pressure"

Slides: 1–12 of 31

Comparative Adverse Effects of Oral Agents: CV Effects

This slide presents a table describing how the comparator or outcomes assessed can affect applicability of the study.  The table consists of two columns of six rows.  Column one is titled ,“Conditions that limit applicability” and column two is titled, “Features that should be extracted into evidence tables.” The data rows are organized under subheader rows. The first row below the column header is a subheader row is designated Comparator.  This is followed by two data rows. Each data row contains conditions described in column one and associated features to be extracted in column two. In the first row, conditions that limit applicability: regimen not reflective of current practice.  In the second column, features that should be extracted into evidence tables: medication dose, schedule and duration, followed in parentheses by the words if applicable. In the second row, conditions that limit applicability: use of substandard alternative therapy. In the second column, features that should be extracted into evidence tables: comparator chosen vs. others available, followed in parentheses by the words if applicable. The next row is the subheader row entitled, “Outcomes.” This is followed by one data row. In the column, conditions that limit applicability: surrogate endpoints, brief follow-up periods, improper definitions for outcomes, composite endpoints . In the second column, features that should be extracted into evidence tables: outcomes (benefits and harms) and  how they were defined.

Comparator, Outcomes, and Applicability

Causal Models and the Structural Relationship of Variables (3 of 7)

Effectiveness of Questionnaires and Clinical Prediction Rules

Pages: [1] 2 3 Next