Skip Navigation
Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
 
Slide Tray
0 slides

Return to Slide Library

Slides

Add Search Results to Slide Tray Search:

"cardiovascular events"

Slides: 1–12 of 25
This slide summarizes the most pertinent results from the Comparative Effectiveness Review (CER) on the benefits and harms of adding an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) to standard medical therapy for stable ischemic heart disease with preserved left ventricular systolic function as compared to standard medical therapy alone or with a placebo. The next several slides will discuss these data in greater detail. When considered together, the benefits and harms of adding an ACEI or an ARB to standard medical therapy indicate that there may be a clinical benefit from such therapy for some patients with stable ischemic heart disease and preserved left ventricular systolic function (LVSF). However, the potential risks of cough, syncope, or hyperkalemia should be considered for each individual patient before adding an ACEI or an ARB to his or her treatment regimen. Very few of the trials evaluated for the CER compared the addition of an ACEI or an ARB or both to an active control. Only two trials compared the addition of an ACEI or a calcium channel blocker to standard medical therapy (Nissen et al., 2004; Yiu et al., 2004). In both trials, the clinical benefits were similar between the two treatment arms, and there was some limited evidence that ACEIs may increase the risk for hypotension and cough. Additional trials are required to make any definitive clinical recommendations with regard to the addition of calcium channel blockers over ACEIs to standard medical therapy. Cardiovascular events are the leading cause of death in patients treated with hemodialysis for chronic kidney disease. Among these patients, left ventricular hypertrophy is considered to be an ischemic heart disease equivalent, as defined by the National Kidney Foundation. In a clinical trial conducted by Zannad et al. (2006), however, there was no impact on cardiovascular mortality after fosinopril, an ACEI, was added to standard therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease and left ventricular hypertrophy.
The Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease (TRANSCEND) trial (Yusuf et al., 2008) was the only trial that met the inclusion criteria for the addition of an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) to standard medical therapy for patients with stable ischemic heart disease (IHD) and preserved left ventricular function (LVSF) as compared to standard medical therapy alone or with a placebo. Patients who could not tolerate angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) were enrolled in the study and were treated with telmisartan. The results of this trial showed that the difference in event rates between the two treatment groups to be less than 2. On average, 56 patients who have stable IHD and preserved LVSF and cannot tolerate ACEIs will need to be treated with an ARB over 5 years to prevent one or more of the following events: cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke. In other words, on average, 14.8 of every 100 patients will experience one or more of these cardiovascular events in the next 5 years. If an ARB were to be added to the treatment regimens of 100 patients, 13 of them would have a risk of suffering one or more of these cardiovascular events. The relative risk reduction in the combined risk for cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke is 12%. All of these data were determined to be at a high level of evidence, meaning that future trials are unlikely to change the estimated differences between these treatment groups.
Pages: [1] 2 3 Next