Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home

Safe Healthcare

Hosted by CDC’s Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion

Share
Compartir

Selected Category: Antimicrobial Resistance

New York Hospital Virtually Eliminates CRE Transmission in ICU Settings

Categories: Antimicrobial Resistance

Dr. Currie

Dr. Currie

Guest Author – Dr. Currie
Montefiore Medical Center,
University Hospital and Academic Medical Center for the Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Today I would like to discuss a highly successful patient safety intervention designed to reduce the prevalence of CRE in the ICU units across Montefiore Medical Center (MMC) in the Bronx, N.Y. Funded by AHRQ, this effort used CDC’s infection prevention guidelines to reduce CRE prevalence and was intended to be exportable for replication at other acute care hospitals.

CRE has been widespread in NYC since 2006, including at our medical center. In NYC, CRE has been almost exclusively due to the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase gene (KPC). At our facilities 40% of the prevalence of KPC was due to patients who were already carrying CRE, prior to their transfer into our facilities from other acute and long term care facilities in the Bronx. My team worked to detect CRE using PCR-based lab tests and protect patients from picking up CRE by rapidly implementing contact isolation precautions for all positive patients.

Our baseline rate was established via weekly peri-rectal swab sampling of all ICU patients (94 beds in 7 units across 3 hospitals) during a four month period. Testing results were not shared with caregivers during the baseline period. However, all health care providers were educated about CRE/KPC and how to stop spread. After roll out, another sampling was initiated for another 4 months that included weekly sampling and sampling all new admissions on arrival on a daily basis. All results were reported within 3 hours of sample pickup and KPC positive patients were immediately placed on contact isolation.

I am thrilled to report that overall our facility reduced KPC in each unit by 53%. The remaining KPC prevalence was almost completely composed of patients who were known to be KPC positive on ICU admission, thus patient to patient transmission was virtually eliminated.
At Montefiore Medical Center, we continue our efforts to protect patients from the threat of CRE and other multi-drug resistant bacteria.

Understanding and combating CRE bacteria in Chicago

Categories: Antimicrobial Resistance

Michael Lin, MD, MPH

Michael Lin, MD, MPH

Guest Authors – Michael Y. Lin, MD MPH
Mary K. Hayden, MD
For the Chicago Prevention Epicenters Program

Increasingly, certain kinds of bacteria are causing serious infections that are difficult or impossible to cure because the bacteria are resistant to all or nearly all antibiotics. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, or CRE, are one of the most feared group of these extremely drug-resistant bacteria; they are spreading worldwide, with few treatment options.

CRE are not equal opportunity bacteria; rather, they typically affect the sickest patients. These patients are cared for at a whole range of inter-connected healthcare facilities, from traditional hospitals to long-term care facilities.

In Chicago, CRE were not known to exist prior to 2007. When an increase in healthcare-associated CRE was detected in 2010, we partnered with CDC to develop a plan to combat CRE infections in our region.

Many questions exist regarding how to best control CRE, especially when it affects a whole region of healthcare facilities. The CDC, via its Prevention Epicenters program, has supported coordination of effort between local scientists such as ourselves and public health officials to try to understand how to best prevent the spread of CRE in Chicago so that lessons can be applied to other areas confronting CRE.

Through support from CDC, we are studying control strategies that fight the spread of CRE in facilities that care for the most vulnerable of our patients. Such control programs include region-wide efforts that combine proven strategies for infection control, such as (1) actively identifying and providing special precautions for patients who carry CRE, (2) improving healthcare worker hygiene practices, and (3) improving patient skin hygiene and applying a protective antiseptic. We will be analyzing the results of the program in late 2013.

In order to monitor the regional effects of the program, we are improving surveillance of CRE through active search strategies, such as periodically checking patients in Chicago intensive care units for CRE. We are also harnessing the power of communication, by growing public health information systems to promote timely sharing of infection control information between healthcare facilities.

In Chicago, we see a tremendous spirit of cooperation among healthcare facilities that is necessary to combat the common CRE threat.

The Beginning of the End of Antibiotics?

Categories: Antimicrobial Resistance

Arjun Srinivasan, MD

Arjun Srinivasan, MD

Author – Arjun Srinivasan, MD
CDC’s Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion

Today in CDC’s March Vital Signs, we report on what could be the beginning of the end of antibiotics. Our arsenal of existing antibiotics is being overpowered by lethal germs called carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). These germs affect people who are in or who recently had inpatient medical care. When someone gets a serious (bloodstream) infection from CRE, we have very few or no antibiotics to cure the problem. Up to half of patients will die. Adding to the concern of spread between people, CRE can spread their antibiotic-fighting weapons to other bacteria, potentially creating additional untreatable bacteria. New drugs won’t be here for many years, so we must do everything we can to preserve current antibiotics for as long as possible.

Here are other important facts to know about CRE:

  • About 4% of US short-stay hospitals had at least one patient with a serious CRE infection during the first half of 2012. About 18% of long-term acute care hospitals had one. This totals almost 200 facilities.
  • One type of CRE has been reported in medical facilities in 42 states .
  • The most common type of CRE is also rising rapidly – there has been a seven-fold increase in its presence during the last 10 years.

So how do we stop the rise of these deadly, resistant CRE germs?

First, know that it can be done. CDC has mapped out specific guidelines that, when followed, can halt CRE infections before they become widespread in medical facilities and before they spread to otherwise healthy people in our communities. In fact, medical facilities in several states have reduced or stopped CRE rates by following CDC’s prevention guidelines. As further proof, Israel decreased CRE infection rates in all 27 of its hospitals by more than 70% in one year with a coordinated prevention program.

To learn specific steps tailored to CRE in your state, review CDC’s comprehensive CRE Prevention Toolkit, which provides CRE prevention guidelines for doctors and nurses, hospitals, long-term acute care hospitals, nursing homes, and health departments. The toolkit provides step-by-step instructions for facilities treating patients with CRE and for those not yet affected by it.

The entire medical system must act quickly to halt CRE infections before it’s too late. We cannot afford to miss this window of opportunity. Antibiotics are a shared resource and therefore preserving them is a shared responsibility. Are you doing everything that you can?

Inappropriate Antibiotic Use in Nursing Homes: A Systems Problem

Categories: Antimicrobial Resistance, Healthcare-associated infections

Chris Crnich, MD

Chris Crnich, MD

Author – Chris Crnich, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine in the Division of Infectious Diseases at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health and is the Hospital Epidemiologist at the William S. Middleton VA Hospital.

A significant proportion of antibiotic use in nursing homes is inappropriate. Inappropriate antibiotic use unnecessarily places residents at risk for adverse drug events and is the major driver of antibiotic resistance in nursing homes.

A traditional approach to the problem of inappropriate antibiotic use in nursing homes centers on educating the provider making prescribing decisions. The thinking goes, that if we can get providers to better understand the adverse consequences of antibiotics and increase their knowledge about antibiotic choice and dosing, the problem of inappropriate antibiotic use in nursing homes will go away. Unfortunately, it is not that simple.

Prescribing in nursing homes is unique in that most decisions to initiate antibiotics are made over the phone without the benefit of a clinical exam performed by the prescribing provider. Coupled with the clinical uncertainty created by the atypical presentation of acute illness in the frail elderly and limited access to diagnostic test results creates a perfect environment for overuse of antibiotics. When viewed through this prism, the likelihood of inappropriate antibiotic use is not simply determined by the provider but by the particulars of the resident’s presentation, accessibility to diagnostic tests, features of the nursing home staff primarily responsible for the clinical exam, as well as the quality of communication between providers and facility staff.
Recognizing that inappropriate antibiotic use is an outcome determined more by the nursing home system rather than an individual provider’s decisions and behaviors is an important step towards addressing this problem. With this in mind, future efforts to improve antibiotic use in nursing homes must begin to focus on strategies that: 1) standardize nursing assessments of the resident with suspected infection; 2) enhance the accessibility of clinical information and diagnostic test results, and 3) improve the quality of communication between providers involved in the antibiotic start process.

Implementing these types of interventions in the nursing home environment will not be without challenge but as Albert Einstein once said, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”. Ignoring the important role of the system on antibiotic use will lead to more of the same. We can and must do better.

Cost of Antibiotic Misuse Too Great to Ignore

Categories: Antimicrobial Resistance

The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA)

The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA)

Author - Sara Cosgrove, MD, MS,
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Medical and scientific advances change the way we look at the world. Before penicillin was introduced in 1942, any infection could be a death sentence. Since then, we have been in awe of and dependent on the use of antibiotics as one of the most valuable tools in our medical toolbox. But society as a whole has taken these drugs for granted with use that has allowed the issue of drug resistant infections to creep up on us and grow to be a serious public health threat. Correcting this misuse of antibiotics in our healthcare facilities is necessary to help preserve these drugs; the cost of inaction is too great to be ignored.

One strategy to preserve the use of the antibiotics currently available and reign in resistance is antimicrobial stewardship. These programs and interventions help prescribers know the right drug, at the right time, in the right dose, for the right duration. These programs help to improve the use of antibiotics.

Antimicrobial resistance is becoming an increasing issue in healthcare facilities and communities throughout the country, as evidenced by outbreaks of MRSA and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). These resistant bugs are associated with increased patient morbidity, mortality and higher healthcare costs spent on useless use of antibiotics and longer, more intense hospital stays.

Older Posts

Pages in this Blog
  1. [1]
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. >>
 
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - cdcinfo@cdc.gov
A-Z Index
  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #