skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line

Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 142415     Find in a Library
Title: Assessment of the Feasibility of Drug Night Courts
Series: BJA Monographs
Author(s): B E Smith ; R C Davis ; S R Goretsky ; A J Lurigio ; S J Popkin
Corporate Author: American Bar Assoc
United States

Loyola University of Chicago
United States
Date Published: 1993
Page Count: 33
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States
Grant Number: 91-DD-CX-K045
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States
Document: Text PDF 
Type: Surveys
Language: English
Country: United States
Annotation: This national survey sought to determine whether cities other than Chicago had experience with running drug court sessions at night. Respondents were asked whether they currently or ever operated courtrooms at night and whether they had ever considered night operations.
Abstract: Questionnaires were sent to the presiding judge, district attorney, and public defender in the 50 largest counties of the United States, including Cook County, Illinois. Responses were received from 130 officials representing all jurisdictions sampled. Survey findings revealed that eight courts had current night operations. Six courts had night hours in the past, and 10 courts said they had considered implementing night hours. Only 18 percent of respondents believed that officials in their cities would support the idea of night operations. Obstacles to night court included insufficient resources, security concerns, lack of interest, no need, problems with jurors or witnesses, productivity, and quality of justice. Aside from Cook County, all current night operations were only for arraignments and, therefore, not directly relevant to the research. Two courts that had previously run night operations had relevant experiences (Brooklyn, New York, and Los Angeles). In Cook County, each department in the night court system had to be creative in finding ways to staff drug night courts and assure staff could obtain the necessary information and support after regular hours. The experience of Cook County demonstrated that night operations can be efficient, that efforts must be made to ensure the quality of justice is not compromised in drug cases, that quality staff can be found for evening hours, and that jurisdictions considering evening operations must be alert to special problems encountered by staff when working at night. Detailed information on the survey sample is appended. References and exhibits are also included.
Main Term(s): Drug law enforcement ; Court studies
Index Term(s): Drug law offenses ; County courts ; Drug offenders ; Courts/ ; Illinois ; New York ; California
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=142415

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs

place holder