skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line

Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 238012   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Alternative Sentencing Policies for Drug Offenders: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Kansas Senate Bill 123, Final Report
Author(s): Don Stemen ; Andres F. Rengifo
Date Published: 03/2012
Page Count: 264
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Dept Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States
Grant Number: 2006-IJ-CX-4032
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States
Document: PDF 
Agency Summary: Agency Summary 
Dataset: Dataset archived in the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data (http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/NACJD)
Type: Legislation/policy analysis
Language: English
Country: United States
Annotation: This National Institute of Justice final grant report evaluates the effectiveness of Kansas’s legislation authorizing alternative sentencing policies for drug offenders.
Abstract: This report provides an assessment of the effectiveness of Kansas Senate Bill 123 (SB 123), enacted in 2003 by the Kansas State Senate, which “created mandatory community-based supervision and drug treatment for nonviolent offenders convicted of a first or second offense of simple drug possession.” The assessment examined the bill’s combined impact on diversion, recidivism rates, and overall prison population rates, as well as its impact on the work routines of the State’s criminal justice system professionals and the bill’s implementation process. The assessment examined the effectiveness of SB 123 over its first 5 years of implementation and found that while offenders sentenced to SB 123 had lower incarceration and revocation filings at 12 months than those sentenced to standard supervision, by 24 months, the differences in recidivism measures had disappeared. It was also found that SB 123 increased the long-term odds of incarceration and revocation filings compared to court services. At the system level, SB 123 resulted in a slight reduction in drug possessors entering prison thus alleviating prison populations and reducing prison costs. These findings indicate that SB 123 has more of an impact at the system-level as compared to the individual-level. Successes noted from the implementation of SB 123 were the increased availability of better treatment programs for drug offenders, improved supervision and referral practices, improved revocation practices, and more open communication among criminal justice stakeholders at the State and local levels. Recommendations for improving SB 123 are discussed. Figures, tables, appendixes, and references
Main Term(s): Sentencing reform
Index Term(s): Drug offenders ; Mandatory sentences ; Sentencing guidelines ; Mixed sentences ; Sentencing factors ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Kansas
Note: For the executive summary see NCJ-238013.
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=260055

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs

place holder