Projects published on Beta are not final and may not include up-to-date data. They are for public testing and comment only. We welcome your feedback. For official products, please visit the official site.
Choose a U.S. State or Territory
U.S. Overview
U.S. Territories:
American Samoa |
Guam |
Northern Mariana Islands |
Puerto Rico |
U.S. Virgin Islands
More State Data & Analysis
by Source
Today In Energy
2012 Brief: Coal and mid-continent crude oil prices declined during 2012
Jan 07, 2013
Uprates can increase U.S. nuclear capacity substantially without building new reactors
Dec 31, 2012
Project Feedback
Read what others are saying about this project.
11/15/2012 - California, United States
Under California Energy Consumption I do not understand why you broke down the different types of crude oil- I think it looks misleading and makes people not see that in CA half of our energy consumption comes from Crude Oil. I think you should show Crude Oil as a whole, like the rest of the natural resources listed.
11/15/2012 - New Hampshire, United States
The EIA is great and I love getting their info, but the CSV files published are virtually impossible to use because the labels are crazy, and when trying to copy-paste from the PDFs, the information doesn't retain itself as a table. Is there another way to download the information in order to easily make graphs, charts, etc?
11/08/2012 - Virginia, United States
Thank you for creating this wonderful interactive map, my only complain is somewhat slow load times of the different overlays of views. Thank you. - Walker
11/08/2012 - Virginia, United States
Make it easier to go back to the map where you can pick another state. The little "US State" at the top is ridiculous.
11/06/2012 - New Mexico, United States
User Friendly Reports more visually friendly
11/02/2012 - Michigan, United States
The zip code field when you click on power plants for further data is being read as a number and contains a comma (i.e. EIA's zip code would read 20,585)
11/01/2012 - Pennsylvania, United States
It would be helpful to add the energy consumption per sector and type, ie., how much gas, electric, etc is utilized per residential, commercial or industrial area. This could be very useful in determining what measures can be taken for energy conservation in a more economical fashion.
10/26/2012 - Colorado, United States
Hello. I write the coal and renewable energy report for the State of Colorado. The coal data is updated, but the renewable information is way old. Your Colorado state profile is from 2009. Your statistics are from 2008 and I noticed that many of them are discontinued. I have relied on DOE EIA for ages and now it just does not keep up with the burgening renewable energy data needed for my state.
10/26/2012 - District of Columbia, United States
I was unable to download the data from the graph Louisiana Energy Consumption Estimates, 2010 (http://www.eia.gov/beta/state/?sid=LA) using firefox, but I was able to using explorer.
10/25/2012 - New York, United States
I'd appreciate some of the same detailed information on propane.
10/25/2012 - New York, United States
One additional layer of information which could be helpful is showing company specific assets. For example, using the same MSHA controller information to filter coal mines would be very helpful.
10/25/2012 - New York, United States
This is great! I work in energy education, largely using the topic of the Marcellus Shale as a teachable moment that gets people actually thinking about where their energy comes from. I'll be using the resource often. It'd be even cooler if the map info could be downloaded for use in Google Earth.
10/23/2012 - Washington, United States
I have never found more information in an easier to use interface than I have at this site. What you have done here is amazing. Thank you so much.
10/23/2012 - Wisconsin, United States
The new map is not user friendly for my students. I have used this for a renewable/non-renewable energy project for a few years now and the old maps with the detailed legend of the renewable and non-renewable energy were much more helpful. Where can I find the old version of the state maps?
10/23/2012 - China
hope you introduce the country-level portal.
10/22/2012 - Texas, United States
You should always have the option to download in excel. For the screens on the web, the data headings both across the top and down the left hand side should be fixed, while the user scrolls across the page. but you guys do a great job! thanks a lot.
10/22/2012 - Wisconsin, United States
For the price rankings it might be helpful to specify if a high ranking corresponds with high or low prices. Consumers will likely consider lower prices a better thing so may expect that the lowest price state would be ranked #1. If it functions like the other rankings, however, that state would be ranked #50. A short clarification in the sidebar would be helpful.
10/22/2012 - Oklahoma, United States
This interactive energy browser is absolutely awesome. Your website was already the most user-friendly way to sift through our nation's incredibly complex energy portfolio, and it just got easier. Thanks!
10/19/2012 - Texas, United States
I do not like the change. In the past you had a GREAT interactive maps that showed power plant, refineries, etc. These maps were much easier to read and mad sense when printed. Similar maps were available for each state. When you rolled over a power plant or refinery on the map an information box popped up with specific information for that site. The new map format is very hard to read due to the change in symbols and the layering. The information is still great but the maps are not very user friendly. I wish you would change back.
10/19/2012 - Ohio, United States
In the main US map, when you hover over a state, it would be nice to see some key points about that state. Also, when I click on a state, it takes a really long time to load the map and then there are tons of icons/symbols---I thought be hovering over them I would be able to see what they mean. I was also hoping to see the county break out/names by state. I hope you will continue to enhance this product. It is a great resource.
10/16/2012 - United Kingdom
I like that the maps are interactive and you can click on icons to get additional details. However, is it possible to extend this functionality to the pipelines and railways?
10/15/2012 - Maryland, United States
this is great
10/11/2012 - Washington, United States
I liked the old website where we could view maps of each type of energy production and distribution networks on the Profiles of US States page as soon as we pulled it up. Very useful for my Geography class. Now it is much more difficult to find these maps.
10/11/2012 - Maine, United States
I've been using EIA state data since 2006 and have to say that this latest change in format has made things more difficult to navigate. I'm mainly interested in accessing state csv files and it's almost impossible to find them now. And why, when finally finding a state, is that map presented with all the meaningless symbols? Finally, I hope in your reworking of the state data you don't change the codes - such as ESTCB, etc. They may seem arcane to users at first, but work very well after one becomes accustomed to them. I hope I'm not being too critical and this helps. Sincerely, Hans N.
10/11/2012 - California, United States
Hi, great website. But, the Ameresco Ox Mountain Plant (Code: 56895) in Half Moon bay has the wrong coordinates listed. The following are the correct coordinates: 37.3, -122.2 Thanks!
10/11/2012 - United States
the map is hard to navigate. the select and zoom in/out functions are a little strange (and where is the reset button??). it is not clear that the users can click on the individual plants to see their details. and it is not clear either what different levels of color shading means (resource abundance??)